• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Iceland Could Become first Country to Ban Male Circumcision"

Koldo

Outstanding Member
"Iceland could become the first country in Europe to ban male circumcision, prompting criticism from religious groups about the ritual practiced in both Judaism and Islam.

The legislation being debated by Iceland’s Parliament would impose a six-year jail term on anyone who “removes part or all of (a child’s) sexual organs” for nonmedical reasons.

“It’s an attack on freedom of religion,” Ahmad Seddeeq, the Egyptian-born imam of the Islamic Cultural Center of Iceland, said Monday (Feb. 19).

Iceland outlawed female genital mutilation in 2005, in line with other nations, to prevent procedures that intentionally alter or injure female genital organs for nonmedical reasons.

“We are talking about children’s rights, not about freedom of belief,” she said when she introduced the bill in early February. “Everyone has the right to believe in what they want, but the rights of children come above the right to believe.”

About 336,000 people live in Iceland, including 250 Jews and 1,500 Muslims, according to government statistics and Seddeeq.


The religious ritual of male circumcision, or removing the foreskin from the penis, generally occurs shortly after birth, during childhood or around puberty as a rite of passage. Jews and Muslims typically circumcise their sons to confirm or mark their relationship with God.

In the United States, 98 percent of Jewish men are circumcised, according to the world agency [the World Health Organization]. The organization also said there is substantial evidence that male circumcision protects against diseases, such as urinary tract infections, syphilis, invasive penile cancer and HIV.
source

So, is the prohibition of circumcision really an unjustified attack on freedom of religion?

.


Congrats to Iceland!
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
And all too often this is what happens with people who have been circumcised

nSD9l1E.jpg

They start compensating for the loss.

.
 

Srivijaya

Active Member
It's certainly one way to curb Muslim and Jewish immigration, I'll give them that.
To be honest, that thought occurred to me when I heard this on the radio a few days back. I did wonder whether there wasn't just a tiny bit of that consideration in there too.

In the event, parents will just opt for a short holiday abroad with their baby boy.
 

joe1776

Well-Known Member
Not a fan of circumcision at all but especially not preformed on infants. If it's really an important holy ritual, people can show devotion by choosing to do it as adults.
I think, in Torah, God specifies eight days after birth..

However, there are other commands of God in their Torah that Jews ignore such as the killing of disobedient children.
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
So in Iceland prostitution is legal but participating in divinely established covenant by circumcising is not.

As it should be. Prostitution is a victimless crime between consenting adults and should be a matter of personal freedom. An infant can't really consent to having his genitals "divinely" disfigured. When they become adults, they can elect to have the procedure done should they so choose.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
An infant can't consent to an abortion either but hey a what's a flap of skin vs a cluster of cells am I right!?!
 

Koldo

Outstanding Member

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
Regardless of how one views the transitioning issue, circumcision in babies is a different beast because the baby can't express any form of consent whatsoever.

So your saying a 3 year old is capable of consent?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Top