Exactly! That's why circumcision on them is so abhorrent. It is an unnecessary practice that can be done later on if they want to.
Then why do you not apply the same to kids transitioning?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Exactly! That's why circumcision on them is so abhorrent. It is an unnecessary practice that can be done later on if they want to.
Didn't Germany already do this?
Then why do you not apply the same to kids transitioning?
What life altering decision is being done to them ?
You mentioned puberty blockers, but it can't be that. What is it ?
I wonder why it is that conservatives can't stick to the issue being discussed when they want to slide by without being challenged? Thus far, conservatives in this thread have brought up prostitution and gender transitioning, rather than addressing circumcision.
Prostitution and gender transitioning are non-sequiturs. We're discussing the non-consensual mutilation of an infant child's genitals.
So you don't consider gender reassignment surgery on children younger than 10, as mutilation/child abuse?
Ah, sexism is alive and well.
I think before ten is likely too young, but that's not what this thread is about. I'd love to hear what conservatives think about non-consensual genital mutilation in infants.
So parents that ok gender reassignment before age 18 are child abusers then?
Gender reassignment surgery is permanent.
Puberty blockers and hormone therapy cause permanent sterilisation and can stunt physical and mental growth. Which they can start on as early a age 10.
So
Why is cutting a flap of skin child abuse, but permanently changing primary and secondary sex characteristics and body chemistry not considered child abuse?
Prostitution is (or was) legal for adults, just as circumcision would remain if this law is implemented. If some religious organisation claimed children having sex was a “divinely established covenant” in their faith, I’d hope you agree that shouldn’t be permitted.So in Iceland prostitution is legal but participating in divinely established covenant by circumcising is not.
So, is the prohibition of circumcision really an unjustified attack on freedom of religion?
.
And all too often this is what happens with people who have been circumcised
They start compensating for the loss.
.
I think children are on the whole mature enough to know something like their gender identity before 18. That's a whole different bag of marbles than a 10 year old.
Children deserve better than our legal system gives them. Why is 18 the magical age? Because we're not willing to have a more serious conversation about children's rights as a society?
Who's doing gender reassignment on 3 years old children??
That's extremely abusive!
Wait. You are talking about 10 years old now and not 3 years old. That's huge age gap.
We can debate about what a 10 years old can consent to and at what age one can consent to hormony therapy. But it is not up to debate that a 3 years old can't consent to anything.
So, is the prohibition of circumcision really an unjustified attack on freedom of religion?