Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Dear Idea – Life is natural, see everything around you, and in time all matters of things will be revealed. ‘revelations’Dear Science - God is not found through natural means, He is not found through science.
Means all of nature will be known as true rather than the worldly ‘ideas’ of things.`Ye may not, therefore, fear them, for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed, and hid, that shall not be known;
Where some may use the word ‘spirit’ yet not comprehend the term sold as magical phenomenon. ‘worldly descriptions’through which to us the most great and precious promises have been given, that through these ye may become partakers of a divine nature, having escaped from the corruption in the world in desires.
As no faith to religions will remain upon the minds of the children.Being able to find Him through natural means would take away our agency.
James 1:26
If any one doth think to be religious among you, not bridling his tongue, but deceiving his heart, of this one vain [is] the religion;
Mark 10
No man is 'good' in perfection, follow the rules! be compassionate over an above the self....17And as he is going forth into the way, one having run and having kneeled to him, was questioning him, `Good teacher, what may I do, that life age-during I may inherit?'
18And Jesus said to him, `Why me dost thou call good? no one [is] good except One -- God;
19the commands thou hast known: Thou mayest not commit adultery, Thou mayest do no murder, Thou mayest not steal, Thou mayest not bear false witness, Thou mayest not defraud, Honour thy father and mother.'
You can weasel word all you like, but it boils down to god setting man up to fail in order to teach man a lesson.God knows everything and does everything with a purpose in mind. He was not setting them up to fail, He was setting them up to learn through experience - it was the only way to learn, He provided them with the opportunity to progress and not just stagnantly sit around...
No pain, no gain.
You can weasel word all you like, but it boils down to god setting man up to fail in order to teach man a lesson.
You sugar coated it yourself in the above quote.
The words of deceit guiding the mind without responsibility to existence; faith in omnipotence; rapture.
Stay honest and never think one sect is the all perfect religion; nor one is perfect in truth!
I hope you have more than that verse to support your theory.He did not "set man up" God did not create everything - link - stop trying to blame God for things that He is in no way responsible for making. He did not create us - we become His creation if we follow Him, He forms the ugly clay, but He did not make the clay...
Isaiah 64:8 But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.
What would it take to save all mankind?
I had absolutely no say in my being here.It would require taking away our free agency. God was not willing to do that. 1/3 of the spirits followed Satan and became the fallen angels – willing to give up their free agency in exchange for a life with no suffering and no mistakes… the other 2/3’s chose to keep their free agency, even if it meant we might not be saved. If you are here living on this Earth with a body right now, you are part of the 2/3’s who chose free agency. You have kept your first estate.
Who are you talking to?My logic and reasoning neither proves nor disproves God.
At any rate, I can easily prove to you via logic that god exists.
A. Science is your god.
B. Science exists.
C. Therefore, your god exists.
:curtsy:
My logic and reasoning neither proves nor disproves God.
At any rate, I can easily prove to you via logic that god exists.
A. Science is your god.
B. Science exists.
C. Therefore, your god exists.
:curtsy:
My logic and reasoning neither proves nor disproves God.
At any rate, I can easily prove to you via logic that god exists.
A. Science is your god.
B. Science exists.
C. Therefore, your god exists.
:curtsy:
The person who posted the OP, who goes by the moniker "science_is_my_god."Who are you talking to?
I am just going by what the guy's own claim. The argument certainly wouldn't work for my god, but I didn't say that it would.I don't think it's intellectually honest to ascribe the term "god" to any attribute or entity.
Ok.The person who posted the OP, who goes by the moniker "science_is_my_god."
Yep! Confused!I am a little confused - we do have responsibblity because we were not created. If God created us - then it would be His creation, His mess. Instead, we have agency, and so the responsibility falls onto our own shouldiers. Does this take away from God? Any being can create a robot. It takes a God to form another being who has agency. If we become His creation - His creation would be nothing less than He is, and He is eternal, with agency
I agree!I am confused as to why anyone would follw a sect that states that they do not have the truth???
Not on your life!That it is impossible to find the truth - so don't even try? Is that the message?
Or like another friend saidJer 9:3 And they bend their tongues like their bow for lies: but they are not valiant for the truth ...
To live in accordance with the essence of things, is the premise of the moral life. One cannot live in peace of mind without at the same time being in harmony with reality.
SocratesThe premises of a moral life is based on a covenant with reality. No life is authentic that is in conflict with the order of the universe.
My sentiments exactly and so unless a person comprehends how life exists in nature and what life is in true reality versus thinking life is breathing, then each rendition is simply an opinion and not true to existence.You may mean well, but I seek the truth - the one and only truth, not a bunch of contradicting politically correct excuses that "everybody is right" to make everyone feel better - everybody is not right - obvously, it is better to state that in the open and change rather than wallow in ignorance and pretend that everything is peachy
My logic and reasoning neither proves nor disproves God.
Lousy logic, confidently speaking. Science is the pursuit of physical truth. Meaning no spirit built your laptop, no spiritual belief teaches a doctor the medical field.At any rate, I can easily prove to you via logic that god exists.
A. Science is your god.
B. Science exists.
C. Therefore, your god exists.
And without science we would not be communicating right now.exactly, and faith is the substance of the hope for things unseen...
they have faith that science will provide them with all the answers
I hope you have more than that verse to support your theory.
Can you show the math behind that comment or is it simply based on a book around the 4th century when the nicene council made JC a god?What do you think "eternal" life means?
Like the description of change by the Eastern sects; yin and yang?Eternal is something with no end and no beginning.
So charles manson will live forever too?God exists eternally, we do too. He would not be able to give us "eternal" life if we were not eternal beings
Thank you for the tirade. It was most predictable. Do you ever pay attention to the context within which a post is made?? :areyoucraLousy logic, confidently speaking. Science is the pursuit of physical truth. Meaning no spirit built your laptop, no spiritual belief teaches a doctor the medical field.
Science is a choice to understand in an unbiased manner of accepting reality as it is versus the opinions of beliefs or that omnipotence governs.
And without science we would not be communicating right now.
The sciences is where most every person relies upon in every day for food, clothing and the medical requisites to continue life. Religions give people culture and a sense of belonging wrapped up in wisdom and associating in a compassionate organization.
But religions cannot extend the physical life nor the understanding of life in the literal sense.
All it can do is make someone feel good by maintaining the precepts that magic and omnipotence is what makes up the day; a path of complacent misunderstandings.
How to respond to one that 'Proved' lousy logic?Thank you for the tirade. It was most predictable. Do you ever pay attention to the context within which a post is made?? :areyoucra
Can you show the math behind that comment or is it simply based on a book around the 4th century when the nicene council made JC a god?[/size][/font][/i]
Like the description of change by the Eastern sects; yin and yang?
So charles manson will live forever too?
I have tried to discount God's existence based on logic and have been about as successful as you have been trying to do the exact opposite. Personally, I come from a religious tradition that stresses that God wants us to know Him. I don't believe we have the capability to understand everything about Him. If we did, we'd be gods ourselves. But I am convinced that most religions, and Christianity in particular, has made God a lot more complicated, a lot less knowable and a lot more of a mystery than He ever wanted to be.I often use logic and reasoning to try to grasp the notion of a "god", and although I have tried many times before to accept a god's existence, I cannot. I argue to theists my logic, my reasoning, even my "gut instinct". And yet, many times I hear the arguements that a god's existence is beyond human comprehension. That I cannot use my logic to logically analize my logic, because it could be flawed. And quite frankly, I agree. However, if such an arguement is used, a god could NOT possibly want our belief in his existence. Why? Because if he created the universe, and therefor created my understanding, and put himself above it,that either means he created my understanding by accident, or that he intended me to disbelieve in him.
Does anyone agree/disagree? Does anyone have thoughts on this?