Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Actually no, I referred to proto-mammals as dinos and suddenly the sky is falling.
Sabretooth like animal is probably the answer to the OP, I don't know what Bunyip is on about/
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If asked...
- Thread starter Parsimony
- Start date
Actually no, I referred to proto-mammals as dinos and suddenly the sky is falling.
Sabretooth like animal is probably the answer to the OP, I don't know what Bunyip is on about/
Bunyip
pro scapegoat
No, not really there isn't. Only YEC kids are taught such a distorted version of biology. Non creationist kids have a better grasp of the basics.
It's very simple - mammals and dinosaurs have a common ancestor, but mammals did not evolve from dinosaurs.
Do you understand why you were wrong and people freaked out?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
... So the answers is no? Because I already did. Do you know the difference between a prehistoric animal and a dinosaur?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Actually i'm still waiting for you to answer the OP, why are you talking to me?
Bunyip
pro scapegoat
Insulting garbage.
...........
You prove me right. If you were not YEC you would have said so.
Because I'm not a creationist. So the op want addressed to me.
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Really? May be I just don't like off-topic questions asked in a personal, hostile manner??
But, it doesn't matter, you can think of me as YEC, that's cool.
Bunyip
pro scapegoat
Really? May be I just don't like off-topic questions asked in a personal, hostile manner??
But, it doesn't matter, you can think of me as YEC, that's cool.
I have been perfectly polite to you.
Your defensiveness makes me certain that my assumption was correct. If you truly believe in creationism, why would you be so ashamed to admit it?
Creationism IS the topic buddy.
Last edited:
Really? May be I just don't like off-topic questions asked in a personal, hostile manner??
But, it doesn't matter, you can think of me as YEC, that's cool.
It is not off topic the op is addressed to creationist ergo it is a relevant question
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Bunyip
pro scapegoat
Clearly you are just trolling.
Oh, it's a quite good question. However, the question is really only relevant to you if you are a creationist. Are you a creationist? Do you believe that tigers and house cats share a common ancestor? If so, what existing scientifically-verifiable evidence can you give us to support that belief?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Seemed plenty clear to me, but whatever you say...
Surely there are plenty of other creationists who can tackle the question. Guess I'll have to wait.
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
My 'real' guess is one of those sabertooth variants.. i'm probably wrong, whoopty doo, what's this supposed to prove?
But how do you know that either tigers or house cats are descended from a saber-toothed cat?
Desert Snake
Veteran Member
I'm guessing.