LOL... my error... I meant to say Rebekah. Can I relegate that error to my age?Yes please. I see the word first used in Gen 24:43 but Sarah died in 23:2.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
LOL... my error... I meant to say Rebekah. Can I relegate that error to my age?Yes please. I see the word first used in Gen 24:43 but Sarah died in 23:2.
I think that as an occupied nation while living under a colonoial regeme like the Roman empire, the language spoken by the people was Hebrew but they knew the foriegn toungue. I also think there was massive manipulation by the Romans for it they had a huge interes in upgrading christ to a God level. in order to do that they had to make him messiah.Didn’t the apostles and first Jewish people who became followers of Jesus Christ understand Hebrew?
I thought it was mostly Aramaic?I think that as an occupied nation while living under a colonoial regeme like the Roman empire, the language spoken by the people was Hebrew but they knew the foriegn toungue. I also think there was massive manipulation by the Romans for it they had a huge interes in upgrading christ to a God level. in order to do that they had to make him messiah.
Judaism thinks about Satan like a dog on a leashThe problem with Satan, is that when you invoke him, all the bets are off. And if you do not invoke him, then where does evil come from?
For sure that makes any belief system with Satan in it, possibly compromised.
Ciao
- viole
the native language was Hebrew. I don't know whether they knew to read, though it is highly important to learn Tora. It may cost too much for a poor familyI thought it was mostly Aramaic?
There's long been a debate about what fraction of early Jews could read & write, and I've seen as high as 90% and as low as 10%. However, we can be rest assured that families back then did not have their own Torah.the native language was Hebrew. I don't know whether they knew to read, though it is highly important to learn Tora. It may cost too much for a poor family
I don't understand. you're saying it talks about a man taking a young woman from point A to point B? the phrase and the next phrase clearly says that in the same way an eagle flies in the sky, in the same way a snake on a rock (crawling or laying), in the same way a ship on the high seas, in the same way a man on a woman,Prov. 30:19 can also be understood as the same while a man tries to take it away from here... the way of a snake. So your point is still mute.
biological evolution is a fact in nature. there is no way to deny it. this how viruses evolve. the mistake sience makes, is that it ignores God's existence and his effect on nature, which is not a bad thing. my point of view is that is, if a scientist need to luanch a rocket to space for example, he shouldn't consider religious claims like the earth is actually flat. to your question, adam was created as full grown young man. we don't really know how he actually looked like.Did God create Adam or was he a evolution of a single cell?
the estimation are about how much of the people remembered their teaching, if they had any. so while as children might study the holy language, they might forget if they didn't dealt with it in their day to day life. on the other hand it was widely spoken, so even if you studied as a kid and since then you didn't read a word, you still spoke it, so it might be different then today with you and latin, for example. I think there was a difffernce in periods of time in historyThere's long been a debate about what fraction of early Jews could read & write, and I've seen as high as 90% and as low as 10%. However, we can be rest assured that families back then did not have their own Torah.
I don't understand. you're saying it talks about a man taking a young woman from point A to point B? the phrase and the next phrase clearly says that in the same way an eagle flies in the sky, in the same way a snake on a rock (crawling or laying), in the same way a ship on the high seas, in the same way a man on a woman,
Proverbs 30:20 “This is the way of an adulterous woman:
She eats and wipes her mouth
and says, ‘I’ve done nothing wrong.’ (God is using a clean language calling her vegina as her mouth).
biological evolution is a fact in nature. there is no way to deny it. this how viruses evolve. the mistake sience makes, is that it ignores God's existence and his effect on nature, which is not a bad thing. my point of view is that is, if a scientist need to luanch a rocket to space for example, he shouldn't consider religious claims like the earth is actually flat. to your question, adam was created as full grown young man. we don't really know how he actually looked like.
not specifically talking about you, I think Christians would have a serious difficalty in understanding Judaism point of view about the image of God.
Christ means Messiah so your question doesn't make sense. The sword Christ was bringing wasn't the literal sword, he was here for peace. Its those that didnt believe him that didnt have it. He even said "However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you, so that you may prove yourselves sons of your Father who is in the heavens, since he makes his sun rise on both the wicked and the good and makes it rain on both the righteous and the unrighteous. For if you love those loving you, what reward do you have? Are not also the tax collectors doing the same thing? And if you greet your brothers only, what extraordinary thing are you doing? Are not also the people of the nations doing the same thing?"- Mt 5:43-47The one to use here, imo, is: Exodus 4:22
ואמרת אל־פרעה כה אמר יהוה בני בכרי ישראל׃
And you shall say to Pharaoh, Thus said the Lord, Israel is my son, my firstborn;
No need for Hebrew, and basically it means that any Jews is the "Son of God". And then you can follow it up with verses showing that God has no form, and the whole idea of God producing a physical offspring is silly according to Judaism.
The nail in the coffin, if a preacher or missionary is obsessing over Isaiah, ( which they do because of the style of writing there )
Isaiah 2:4 + Matthew 10:34
That's an absolute contradiction. Jesus cannot be the messiah if he is bringing the sword. The messiah is supposed convince people to get rid of their swords and peace will flourish NOT division. The preacher will say, "no no, that's the 2nd coming." But you can just keep posting those verses. Till they put you on ignore, or whatever they do on YT.
We get preachers around here, for sure. So a lot of these topics have been presented and rebuked.
Proverbs 30:19 The way of an eagle in the air, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the midst of the sea, And the way of a man with a young woman.Proverbs 30:19 talks about the way of the man with a maid - a young woman of marriage age
Proverbs 30:20 talks about the way of a woman 'ishshah - different thought, different words and a different gender.
apparently, you misunderstood me.I'm not talking about the rest of creation but the creation of man.
i don't see where the sources you brought disagree. please quote the actual wordsadam was created as full grown young man
Proverbs 30:19 The way of an eagle in the air, The way of a serpent on a rock, The way of a ship in the midst of the sea, And the way of a man with a young woman.
Proverbs 30:20 This is the way of an adulterous woman: She eats and wipes her mouth, And says, “I have done no wickedness.”
maybe so... will check.apparently, you misunderstood me.
The source @dybmh brought says every Jew is God's son. there are other phrases that says that. The only people who said that God said he loves are the people of Israel.Christ means Messiah so your question doesn't make sense. The sword Christ was bringing wasn't the literal sword, he was here for peace. Its those that didnt believe him that didnt have it. He even said "However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you, so that you may prove yourselves sons of your Father who is in the heavens, since he makes his sun rise on both the wicked and the good and makes it rain on both the righteous and the unrighteous. For if you love those loving you, what reward do you have? Are not also the tax collectors doing the same thing? And if you greet your brothers only, what extraordinary thing are you doing? Are not also the people of the nations doing the same thing?"- Mt 5:43-47
I have given upCorrect.. eagle (not air); serpent (not rock); ship (not sea); man (not virgin woman); adulterous woman.
They are different subjects. Your point still is mute.
The source @dybmh brought says every Jew is God's son. there are other phrases that says that. The only people who said that God said he loves are the people of Israel.
with a lot of loveI'd like to thank you, as well as the other Jewish members in this thread, for sharing your knowledge and perspective on the Bible. It's very insightful.
In the question of "If God made Adam" - your point says they are an evolution the Jewish posts said otherwise.biological evolution is a fact in nature
OK Your point wasn't supportive in its usage, so I understand why giving up is the only solution Maid is always used in context of a young woman, virgin, ready for marriage.I have given up
That doesnt seem to have anything to do with our conversation. Did i miss something?The source @dybmh brought says every Jew is God's son. there are other phrases that says that. The only people who said that God said he loves are the people of Israel.