In the trolley problem, killing people is only ethical because the person making the decision is a limited being. It's acceptable for them to choose an outcome that ends in deaths because they don't have any outcome available that doesn't result in deaths. It's ethical for them to minimize deaths to the extent that they're capable of.Well in the example, we are assuming that it is morally ok to kill the individual.... so the question "shluld you kill him" is a tautology and you should answer yes.
Well i bet that atleast hypothetically you can think on many scenarios where killing a child is morally ok. (Trolly problems come to mind)
... but having an "omni" god subject to limits like this is a contradiction in terms.
A limited human being might not be able to just stop the out-of-control trolley without any deaths, but a god could.
So you're assuming that God could command the murder of a child. IOW, you're begging the question by assuming that there must be a good reason.So if its logically possible to ethically sacrifice a child
And god cant command unethical stuff
Then it follows that sacrificing a child would morally ok. And therefore one should follow the command.
But as i said before, the fact that I should do something doesn't imply that I would do it. (Which is why I voted NO)
Maybe one of your initial assumptions is wrong. Maybe God commanding a parent to murder their child is an impossible circumstance.
Edit: or maybe God commanding a parent to murder their child demonstrates that God isn't actually "omni" good.