• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If God existed how could it be proven?

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I really see no reason to care about some proposed being that is so powerless to intervene on my existence that it's only means of providing evidence for itself is if I happen to stumble upon the writings of some long dead messenger he sent.
I am sure I have told you before that God is not powerless to intervene. God is all-powerful so He could intervene and make everyone into believers if He wanted to. Below is the passage where Baha'u'llah wrote that, and then He explained why God does not do that.

“He Who is the Day Spring of Truth is, no doubt, fully capable of rescuing from such remoteness wayward souls and of causing them to draw nigh unto His court and attain His Presence. “If God had pleased He had surely made all men one people.” His purpose, however, is to enable the pure in spirit and the detached in heart to ascend, by virtue of their own innate powers, unto the shores of the Most Great Ocean, that thereby they who seek the Beauty of the All-Glorious may be distinguished and separated from the wayward and perverse. Thus hath it been ordained by the all-glorious and resplendent Pen…”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 71


In the context of the passage above, If God had pleased He had surely made all men one people it means that God could have made all people into believers, but If God has pleased, implies that God did not want to make all people into believers, verified by the fact that not all men are believers. The passage goes on to say why God didn’t want to make us believers... In short, God wants us to do our own homework and become believers by our own efforts (by virtue of their own innate powers).

According to this passage, God wants everyone to search for Him and determine if He exists by using their own innate intelligence and using their free will to make the decision to believe. God wants those who are sincere and truly search for Him to believe in Him. God wants to distinguish those people from the others who are not sincere, those who are unwilling to put forth any effort.

If God proved to everyone that He exists then it would not be possible to distinguish between people and how much they really care about believing in Him. In short, God wants everyone to prove their worthiness.
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
I am sure I have told you before that God is not powerless to intervene. God is all-powerful so He could intervene and make everyone into believers if He wanted to. Below is the passage where Baha'u'llah wrote that, and then He explained why God does not do that.

“He Who is the Day Spring of Truth is, no doubt, fully capable of rescuing from such remoteness wayward souls and of causing them to draw nigh unto His court and attain His Presence. “If God had pleased He had surely made all men one people.” His purpose, however, is to enable the pure in spirit and the detached in heart to ascend, by virtue of their own innate powers, unto the shores of the Most Great Ocean, that thereby they who seek the Beauty of the All-Glorious may be distinguished and separated from the wayward and perverse. Thus hath it been ordained by the all-glorious and resplendent Pen…”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 71


In the context of the passage above, If God had pleased He had surely made all men one people it means that God could have made all people into believers, but If God has pleased, implies that God did not want to make all people into believers, verified by the fact that not all men are believers. The passage goes on to say why God didn’t want to make us believers... In short, God wants us to do our own homework and become believers by our own efforts (by virtue of their own innate powers).

According to this passage, God wants everyone to search for Him and determine if He exists by using their own innate intelligence and using their free will to make the decision to believe. God wants those who are sincere and truly search for Him to believe in Him. God wants to distinguish those people from the others who are not sincere, those who are unwilling to put forth any effort.


I'm just not interested in developing a relationship with anyone who likes to play silly head games. It's this intricate ridiculous puzzle of trying to decipher 'real' messengers from 'fake' messengers and hoping you can interpret their writings correctly. Those who happen to stumble upon the RIGHT messenger get the prize of being pure in spirit and detached in heart... while the poor souls who get fooled into listening to the WRONG messenger or simply haven't seen sufficient evidence to believe in any messenger are deemed the wayward and perverse. What a FUN game! Especially when you consider that the mastermind of it all COULD easily have just revealed himself to everyone without having use all of the messenger mumbo-jumbo.

It sounds like the ultimate high maintenance relationship to me. I'm expected to jump through all of these ridiculously mysterious hoops before I can even get verification that this entity that wants to have a relationship with me even exists. If that's the type of relationship you're interested in, go for it. Personally, I'm pass.

If God proved to everyone that He exists then it would not be possible to distinguish between people and how much they really care about believing in Him. In short, God wants everyone to prove their worthiness.

And what does this even mean? You either have sufficient reason to believe in something or you do not. What does it mean to 'really care' about believing something? Once there's enough evidence or proof that something exists you simply start believing in its existence. What does caring or 'really' caring have to do with anything when it comes to evidence for belief?
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Why do you think all these religions were all invented by man and had nothing to do with God? Why would man invent religions and say they came from God. That makes no sense to me.

Humans are extremely prone to superstition and cognition errors.

Christian civilization only existed in the first place because of Jesus although it grew and flourished because of Constantine and what happened after that, namely the Christians doing so much missionary work.

All you are doing, is confirming what I said.

BELIEVERS did this.

Christian civilization still exists even though it is not what it once was. I am not talking about Christian theocracies, I am talking about people who believe in and follow the teachings of Jesus, the Christians who comprise the civilization. We do not live in a secular humanist civilizations because most people believe in God and a religion, be it Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity or Islam. The governments are secular but the people are not.

You are seriously confusing religion, culture and civilization as if they are one and the same thing.
They are not.


Christianity started with Jesus and Islam started with Muhammad and then they grew larger over time because the beliefs in those Messengers spread far and wide.

Yes, because of BELIEVERS.

You keep giving credit to the people around which the cults started. This is wrong. Credit goes to BELIEVERS.

That is all true, the reason religion takes over a civilization is because people believe, but it is still not ad populum because that is an argument related to what is true or false.

Isn't your entire argument here that because of these religions spreading and taking over entire societies, therefor they are credible?

If that isn't your argument, then I have no clue what your point is.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Many Christians believe for emotional reasons because of personal "God experiences." Baha'is also believe that Jesus was the Messiah, but not the Messiah of the end times. We also believe Jesus was the Son of God, but only figuratively, because God has no offspring. Baha'is also believe that Jesus was the Word made flesh in the sense of being manifested in the flesh, not incarnated in the flesh. Jesus is not God and Jesus never claimed to be God but once a Christian has been taught that it is impossible to change their belief even though it is in no way supported by the Bible.

You have more patience than I do. What do 7th Day Adventists believe about the return of Christ?
It's not patience. It's avoidance and restraint. You know how it is... They feel obligated to try and "save" you, because they believe without Jesus you're going to hell. So any little chance they get, they make it about Jesus. Like... "Oh look at the pretty flower. Isn't God wonderful how he created such a beautiful place for us to live. And what do we do? We reject his only Son, Jesus, who came to give us the free gift of eternal life."

7th Day Adventists are interesting because they start the 2300 day prophecy from Daniel in 457BC which gets them to 1844. But they say that's when, I think, the "heavenly" sanctuary started to be cleansed. Whatever. I'll let you know more later. Oh, and the 1260 days, they don't end that in 1844. They tie in with the Catholic Church and the Popes.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
No, it won't affect your life or livelihood in this life, but it will affect your afterlife which is for all eternity, compared to this life which is very temporary. You can discount that if you want to but that won't make it go away. If there is an afterlife there is an afterlife and that is reality, so what you believe about that won't change reality.
I bolded, underlined and italicized a very important part of your post, in which you implicitly admit that knowing this for sure is simply not on the table. Until it is, I see absolutely no reason to react to someone else's claims that it is without sufficient evidence.

What you have presented is much like someone telling you something that sounds a bit off in comparison with reality, insisting that if you step outside the door of your house, gravity will somehow "turn off", and you will float off into the atmosphere. Given only this MESSENGER'S testimony as evidence, would you simply stay inside your house and not go through the door, for fear that you may find yourself floating off into the sky? I mean, this person told you in earnest that you should not go through the door. Based on the FACT that you are sitting here, telling me about "the afterlife" and what I must be worried about as regards my ultimate demise, this seems to be the same sort of scenario. Someone is just telling you about consequences to an action you might take... and your prescription is to abide by the "rules" and therefore avoid those consequences, right? So, shouldn't you just do the same and listen to this person, or at least be afraid enough of those possible consequences and let that keep you from walking through the door? Or... might you be in the mindset to look for evidence that they are correct? Perhaps throw something else out the door? Perhaps tether yourself to something and take the step? My point being - just because we can't gain evidence as easily for what happens "after we die" does NOT mean we should just throw requirements for evidence out the window and blindly accept what some other goofball wants to tell us about it. Words are not sufficient evidence. "Messengers" be damned.

There is plenty of evidence that it matters in various scriptures, you just do not accept that as evidence....but that does not mean it is not evidence, only that it is not evidence to you.
Again - this is NOTHING MORE than someone telling you. Exactly like in the example above about the anti-gravity door.

So, here, I am about to do something utterly cruel and ruin your life, forcing you to adhere to my prescriptions because now you are about to read something which you cannot provide any evidence against, and that seems to be your mode of operation - to simply accept things outright based on what someone else has to say. So here goes - I advise you not to chew your food anymore. Chewing food releases small gremlins from the spaces present between your jawbones, at the joints. These gremlins are microscopic, and are extremely fast and very aware, such that no human eye could ever catch them. As soon as anyone is looking, they duck away, faster than the human eye can even keep up. These gremlins enter the rest of your body and cause damage to various parts, forcing everything to age and break down faster, and shaving entire years off of your life. I have been swallowing my food whole now for 20 years, and I feel fantastic. I basically haven't aged a day in 20 years. Can you believe it? This is all true, and you should heed my warning. To not do so is irresponsible, and somewhat selfish as well, since you will die much sooner, and take yourself away from your loved ones if you continue to chew your food. You have been warned.

See what I mean? Exactly the same. Now it is written... which is all the evidence you should need, correct? CORRECT?
 
Last edited:

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I'm just not interested in developing a relationship with anyone who likes to play silly head games. It's this intricate ridiculous puzzle of trying to decipher 'real' messengers from 'fake' messengers and hoping you can interpret their writings correctly. Those who happen to stumble upon the RIGHT messenger get the prize of being pure in spirit and detached in heart... while the poor souls who get fooled into listening to the WRONG messenger or simply haven't seen sufficient evidence to believe in any messenger are deemed the wayward and perverse. What a FUN game! Especially when you consider that the mastermind of it all COULD easily have just revealed himself to everyone without having use all of the messenger mumbo-jumbo.
You still don’t get it, do you? Why don’t colleges just send degrees in the mail to EVERYONE who wants a college degree? Why do people have to pay tuition and go to classes and study, taking 20 years out of their lives to get college degrees like I did?

Why can’t everyone just be a doctor or a lawyer because they WANT to be one, why do they have to go to school for years and years in order to be QUALIFIED?

Why do you think God should operate any differently than the world operates?

Everyone is not capable of being a doctor or a lawyer unless they have the capacity and they are able to tow the line, but there are other jobs for those people, each according to their capacity.

God does not expect anyone to do what is not within their capacity and we all have different capacities. Only God knows what those capacities are because God is all-knowing, so we might underestimate or overestimate our own capacities.

“From the exalted source, and out of the essence of His favor and bounty He hath entrusted every created thing with a sign of His knowledge, so that none of His creatures may be deprived of its share in expressing, each according to its capacity and rank, this knowledge.”Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 262

But if we don’t put forth any effort we cannot expect to get anything. That is just how it works in life. Some people might get lucky and inherit a fortune and some people might get lucky and just believe in God with no effort, but that is not the case for most people. The thing is that those who make an effort are the ones who really appreciate what they have. It means something to them and they become better people for making the effort as opposed to getting a free ride.

“The incomparable Creator hath created all men from one same substance, and hath exalted their reality above the rest of His creatures. Success or failure, gain or loss, must, therefore, depend upon man’s own exertions. The more he striveth, the greater will be his progress.” Gleanings, pp. 81-82
It sounds like the ultimate high maintenance relationship to me. I'm expected to jump through all of these ridiculously mysterious hoops before I can even get verification that this entity that wants to have a relationship with me even exists. If that's the type of relationship you're interested in, go for it. Personally, I'm pass.

In other words, if you cannot make God do what you want, you are not going to bother with Him. That’s fine, because God does not need anyone’s belief.
“If God proved to everyone that He exists then it would not be possible to distinguish between people and how much they really care about believing in Him. In short, God wants everyone to prove their worthiness.”

And what does this even mean? You either have sufficient reason to believe in something or you do not. What does it mean to 'really care' about believing something? Once there's enough evidence or proof that something exists you simply start believing in its existence. What does caring or 'really' caring have to do with anything when it comes to evidence for belief?
You already said that you are not going to look at the evidence God provides, which is the Messengers, but if you have looked and you do not consider that evidence then you don’t. Really caring means you care enough to look, like a person who really cares about getting into college applies to get in. Really caring does not mean you expect God to provide some kind of special evidence that He has never provided for anyone.
 

McBell

Unbound
You still don’t get it, do you? Why don’t colleges just send degrees in the mail to EVERYONE who wants a college degree? Why do people have to pay tuition and go to classes and study, taking 20 years out of their lives to get college degrees like I did?
Um...
because they chose that particular route instead of buying their degree from a degree mill?
because they were not lucky enough to get an honorary degree ?

Why do you think God should operate any differently than the world operates?
I am most curious what school you believe god attended...
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Um...
because they chose that particular route instead of buying their degree from a degree mill?
because they were not lucky enough to get an honorary degree ?
A degree mill degree, if there is such a thing, won't help anyone when they go to get a job and cannot do that job because they never learned anything. :rolleyes:
Do you want to go to a doctor who never went to med school? o_O
I am most curious what school you believe god attended...
God does not have to go to school because God is all-knowing by His very nature.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
If God existed, could we prove it? How could we prove it?

How could we prove that God exists if God is in hiding, undetectable by humans?

How could we prove God exists if God is not in the material world and has no physical properties?

Since God insists on hiding, it makes more sense to me that God should provide the evidence or proof, especially if God wants people to believe that He exists.

But how could God provide evidence or proof that He exists?

If God does not provide any evidence or proof why should we believe that God exists? How would it be fair for God to expect us to believe with no evidence or proof?

If God existed, what would God do to prove it? How could God prove that He exists and still remain in hiding?

Atheists, if God existed what would you expect God to do to prove that He exists? What would be adequate proof for you to believe that God exists? Would you expect absolute proof of would you accept evidence?

Like the Hebrew I imagine.
Throw us in the desert and make us rely on the daily mana from heaven until we had no choice but to accept the existence of God. 40 years of daily miracles might do it.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Humans are extremely prone to superstition and cognition errors.
That is true, but that does not explain why humans would invent religions and say they came from God. That makes no sense to me. It also makes no sense that humans could come up with all those scriptures or why they would go to all that trouble. Clearly, these people believed there was a God.
You are seriously confusing religion, culture and civilization as if they are one and the same thing.
They are not.
They are not the same but they are all interrelated.
Yes, because of BELIEVERS.

You keep giving credit to the people around which the cults started. This is wrong. Credit goes to BELIEVERS.
No, I am not giving the credit to the Messengers of God who founded the religions, and they did not want any credit. The credit for spreading the religion goes to the believers.
Isn't your entire argument here that because of these religions spreading and taking over entire societies, therefor they are credible?

If that isn't your argument, then I have no clue what your point is.
Credible means is able to be believed; convincing. Sure they were credible because people believed them, but don't conflate credible with true. Just because many or most people believed them that does not mean they were true. That has never been my argument. To say that would be committing the fallacy of ad populum.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
I have lost track now, but I think my original point was that the Messengers of God are credible so that proves that using Messengers has always been an effective way for God to communicate to humans in order to garner belief. The fact that people have misconstrued what the Messengers have communicated and the fact that the different Messengers have communicated different messages at different times, which has led to religious people disagreeing, is a completely separate issue, and cannot be attributed to the METHOD of communication itself.

Moreover, what happened in the past is in the past. If people recognized Baha'u'llah, the latest Messenger of God, and read what He wrote the reasons why all that happened in the past and the reasons why it will never happen again would become crystal clear. Everyone has free will to choose so you certainly cannot blame God or the Messenger because people rejected the Messenger, that is unjust.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Like the Hebrew I imagine.
Throw us in the desert and make us rely on the daily mana from heaven until we had no choice but to accept the existence of God. 40 years of daily miracles might do it.
Well, look who finally showed up to dinner. Where ya been anyway? I have missed seeing you here. :)
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Well, look who finally showed up to dinner. Where ya been anyway? I have missed seeing you here. :)

My mother died, dealing with probate, buying a new house in Florida, busy at work.
Life happens and you have to prioritize.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
I bolded, underlined and italicized a very important part of your post, in which you implicitly admit that knowing this for sure is simply not on the table. Until it is, I see absolutely no reason to react to someone else's claims that it is without sufficient evidence.

How the hell do you think you are going to know for sure until you die, but by then it will be too late to change your mind because you cannot live this life over again. I know for sure now, but how I know is not something others can understand. Even many believers cannot understand how I know, all I can say is that I know because if evidence coupled with faith. Why I see something as evidence that atheists do not see as evidence is partly because God guides those who He chooses to guide, so it is not all because of something I did.
What you have presented is much like someone telling you something that sounds a bit off in comparison with reality…

Someone is just telling you about consequences to an action you might take... and your prescription is to abide by the "rules" and therefore avoid those consequences, right? So, shouldn't you just do the same and listen to this person, or at least be afraid enough of those possible consequences and let that keep you from walking through the door?
First, it is all a matter of perspective. The only reason it seems a bit off to you is because you have limited reality to the physical reality, so you believe that is all there is.

Second, we all get our information from somewhere so it really all depends upon who the someone is that is telling me.
Or... might you be in the mindset to look for evidence that they are correct? Perhaps throw something else out the door? Perhaps tether yourself to something and take the step? My point being - just because we can't gain evidence as easily for what happens "after we die" does NOT mean we should just throw requirements for evidence out the window and blindly accept what some other goofball wants to tell us about it. Words are not sufficient evidence. "Messengers" be damned.
There is no need for me to look for evidence that they are correct because I know they are incorrect. I am not afraid of walking through the door because I know gravity is part of the physical reality.

I never suggested that you should just throw requirements for evidence out the window and blindly accept what some other goofball wants to tell us about it. We cannot die and find out for ourselves what happens, so words are all we have, either what other people tell us or what we can read, and as such we have to consider who is worthy of our belief.
Again - this is NOTHING MORE than someone telling you. Exactly like in the example above about the anti-gravity door.
Of course we have to rely upon what someone is telling us, how else could we ever know anything?
If you go to college you read textbooks and rely upon the instruction of the teachers.
So, here, I am about to do something utterly cruel and ruin your life, forcing you to adhere to my prescriptions because now you are about to read something which you cannot provide any evidence against, and that seems to be your mode of operation - to simply accept things outright based on what someone else has to say.
Why should I listen to you and believe you, what are your credentials? What did you ever do to earn my belief or trust?
See what I mean? Exactly the same. Now it is written... which is all the evidence you should need, correct? CORRECT?
No, it is not the SAME at all because I have no REASON to believe anything you say or write. You are not equivalent to a Messenger of God.

False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.[1] A colloquial expression of false equivalency is "comparing apples and oranges".

This fallacy is committed when one shared trait between two subjects is assumed to show equivalence, especially in order of magnitude, when equivalence is not necessarily the logical result.[2] False equivalence is a common result when an anecdotal similarity is pointed out as equal, but the claim of equivalence doesn't bear scrutiny because the similarity is based on oversimplification or ignorance of additional factors. The pattern of the fallacy is often as such: "If A is the set of c and d, and B is the set of d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal". d is not required to exist in both sets; only a passing similarity is required to cause this fallacy to be used.

False equivalence arguments are often used in journalism[3][4] and in politics, where flaws of one politician may be compared to flaws of a wholly different nature of another.[5]

False equivalence - Wikipedia
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
My mother died, dealing with probate, buying a new house in Florida, busy at work.
Life happens and you have to prioritize.
Sorry to hear about your mother. My older brother took care of everything when my mother passed in 2007.
Buying a new house and moving that far away is a big undertaking. Let me know how that works out.
I often feel like I would like to move but there would be too much I would have to do to move, even out of this house into another house, so I will probably just stay here, at least for now.
 

QuestioningMind

Well-Known Member
You still don’t get it, do you? Why don’t colleges just send degrees in the mail to EVERYONE who wants a college degree? Why do people have to pay tuition and go to classes and study, taking 20 years out of their lives to get college degrees like I did?

Why can’t everyone just be a doctor or a lawyer because they WANT to be one, why do they have to go to school for years and years in order to be QUALIFIED?

Why do you think God should operate any differently than the world operates?

Everyone is not capable of being a doctor or a lawyer unless they have the capacity and they are able to tow the line, but there are other jobs for those people, each according to their capacity.

God does not expect anyone to do what is not within their capacity and we all have different capacities. Only God knows what those capacities are because God is all-knowing, so we might underestimate or overestimate our own capacities.

“From the exalted source, and out of the essence of His favor and bounty He hath entrusted every created thing with a sign of His knowledge, so that none of His creatures may be deprived of its share in expressing, each according to its capacity and rank, this knowledge.”Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 262

But if we don’t put forth any effort we cannot expect to get anything. That is just how it works in life. Some people might get lucky and inherit a fortune and some people might get lucky and just believe in God with no effort, but that is not the case for most people. The thing is that those who make an effort are the ones who really appreciate what they have. It means something to them and they become better people for making the effort as opposed to getting a free ride.

“The incomparable Creator hath created all men from one same substance, and hath exalted their reality above the rest of His creatures. Success or failure, gain or loss, must, therefore, depend upon man’s own exertions. The more he striveth, the greater will be his progress.” Gleanings, pp. 81-82


In other words, if you cannot make God do what you want, you are not going to bother with Him. That’s fine, because God does not need anyone’s belief.

You already said that you are not going to look at the evidence God provides, which is the Messengers, but if you have looked and you do not consider that evidence then you don’t. Really caring means you care enough to look, like a person who really cares about getting into college applies to get in. Really caring does not mean you expect God to provide some kind of special evidence that He has never provided for anyone.

You still don’t get it, do you? Why don’t colleges just send degrees in the mail to EVERYONE who wants a college degree? Why do people have to pay tuition and go to classes and study, taking 20 years out of their lives to get college degrees like I did?

Sorry, but your analogy isn’t quite accurate. If there’s an accredited university that teaches something I want to learn I have no problem whatsoever investing in the tuition and years of study required to gain that knowledge. Unfortunately what you’re asking is for me to invest the tuition and years of study just to obtain evidence that the university and its curriculum is even REAL. If your god has insights he has to reveal to me I’m all for paying the ‘tuition’ and investing the years of study… but you’re telling me that first I have to invest tuition and time JUST to get evidence that your god exists. I’m NOT asking your god to snap his metaphorical fingers and completely enlighten me to all he has to teach… ALL I’m asking is some verifiable evidence of his simple existence BEFORE I invest all that time and resources.


In other words, if you cannot make God do what you want, you are not going to bother with Him. That’s fine, because God does not need anyone’s belief.


No, it’s more like I’m not interested in a relationship in which the other individual insists that I prove myself ‘worthy’ before they’re even willing to prove that they exist. If god doesn’t need my belief, I certainly don’t need to play his silly head games.


You already said that you are not going to look at the evidence God provides, which is the Messengers, but if you have looked and you do not consider that evidence then you don’t. Really caring means you care enough to look, like a person who really cares about getting into college applies to get in. Really caring does not mean you expect God to provide some kind of special evidence that He has never provided for anyone.

Actually I’ve never said I’m not going to look at the evidence. In fact, I’ve told you before that I’ve spent endless hours reading over texts that people have claimed would ‘open my eyes to god’, but to no avail. I’ve asked you to please provide me with what you felt was the most convincing evidence your faith has. You sent me two, one was a rather vague account of how a temple would be built on a hillside and the other was a rather accurate prediction of WWI. And though I found the predictions about WWI to be impressive, there was nothing about them that is any different from someone making an accurate prediction and certainly no reason to believe that the prediction was divinely inspired.


It sounds to me like what you mean by ‘really caring’ is to START OFF accepting that god is real and then start searching for texts that appear to support your assumption. That’s not how it works for people who are natural skeptics. I can’t just ‘pretend’ like I think it’s real. I can’t just ‘pretend’ that an accurate prediction must have been divinely revealed by some god being. And I can’t ‘pretend’ that the girl on the dating website is real and try to prove myself worthy of her BEFORE she actually provides evidence that she’s a real person.
 

McBell

Unbound
A degree mill degree, if there is such a thing, won't help anyone when they go to get a job and cannot do that job because they never learned anything. :rolleyes:
Except that they do exist and people do get and keep jobs because of their purchased degree.

Do you want to go to a doctor who never went to med school? o_O
Not particularly.

God does not have to go to school because God is all-knowing by His very nature.
Interesting how you ask:

Why do you think God should operate any differently than the world operates?
Then proclaim that it does not work the same for god.....
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Except that they do exist and people do get and keep jobs because of their purchased degree.
I can hardly believe anyone would purchase a degree because that is not only lazy but it is dishonest.
Interesting how you ask:

Why do you think God should operate any differently than the world operates?
Then proclaim that it does not work the same for god.....
I said that God does not have to go to school because God is all-knowing by His very nature, but that has nothing to do with how God operates, that is just what God is, all-knowing. Humans are not al-knowing and that is why they have to go to school.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Sorry, but your analogy isn’t quite accurate. If there’s an accredited university that teaches something I want to learn I have no problem whatsoever investing in the tuition and years of study required to gain that knowledge. Unfortunately what you’re asking is for me to invest the tuition and years of study just to obtain evidence that the university and its curriculum is even REAL. If your god has insights he has to reveal to me I’m all for paying the ‘tuition’ and investing the years of study… but you’re telling me that first I have to invest tuition and time JUST to get evidence that your god exists. I’m NOT asking your god to snap his metaphorical fingers and completely enlighten me to all he has to teach… ALL I’m asking is some verifiable evidence of his simple existence BEFORE I invest all that time and resources.
I never suggested that that you invest years of study just to obtain evidence that God exists, but if you want to know you have to invest some time doing some investigation. It varies by person how much they need to investigate in order to believe. Aside from reading what God has revealed through the Messenger the only other way you could know is if you prayed to God for a sign and got one. I know three former atheists who did that and now they are believers, but after that two of them embarked upon a study of the major religions. Without a religion you cannot know what God’s will is for you, so what is the point of believing that God exists?.

Verifiable evidence that God exists? Do you understand what you are asking for? Nobody has EVER had verifiable evidence that God exists, and you expect God to provide you with that? If God had wanted to be verified He would have made Himself verifiable, but obviously that was never His intention.
No, it’s more like I’m not interested in a relationship in which the other individual insists that I prove myself ‘worthy’ before they’re even willing to prove that they exist. If god doesn’t need my belief, I certainly don’t need to play his silly head games.
In other words, you want special treatment, what God has not provided to anyone else, custom-made proof sent special delivery right into your mailbox.

You do not have to prove yourself worthy, all you have to do is something if you want something, rather than doing nothing and expecting to get something for nothing.

God does not need your belief because God has no needs. The only reason to believe in God is for your own benefit.
Actually I’ve never said I’m not going to look at the evidence. In fact, I’ve told you before that I’ve spent endless hours reading over texts that people have claimed would ‘open my eyes to god’, but to no avail.
I am sorry that I did not recall you ever telling me that. What texts were those?
I’ve asked you to please provide me with what you felt was the most convincing evidence your faith has. You sent me two, one was a rather vague account of how a temple would be built on a hillside and the other was a rather accurate prediction of WWI. And though I found the predictions about WWI to be impressive, there was nothing about them that is any different from someone making an accurate prediction and certainly no reason to believe that the prediction was divinely inspired.
If you do not believe the Bible is divinely inspired then Bible prophecies are not going to be meaningful for you. If you believe that anyone can make the predictions that Baha’u’llah made then that won’t be meaningful either. Those predictions are proof for some people but not for others.

Not only did Baha’u’llah know things He did not learn in any school, He also predicted many things that later came to pass. In this book, which can be read online, is a list of 30 specific things Baha’u’llah predicted that later came to pass: The Challenge of Baha'u'llah

I just happened to have one of these predictions in a Word document

The coming dawn of the Atomic Age was writ large in the prophecies of Baha'u'llah and 'Abdu'1-Baha.

Nuclear Terror

Prophecy 21: The development of nuclear weapons.

In a Tablet entitled Words of Paradise (written shortly before His passing in 1892), Baha'u'llah noted the rush by Western civilization to develop ever-more-deadly weapons of war. Explaining the urgency of His call for world unity and peace, He declared:

Strange and astonishing things exist in the earth but they are hidden from the minds and the understanding of men. These things are capable of changing the whole atmosphere of the earth and their contamination would prove lethal.141

This reference to 'strange and astonishing things' aptly describes the twin processes of fission and fusion by which we obtain nuclear energy. The reality of such a power was again affirmed in 1911 by 'Abdu'1-Baha:

There is in existence a stupendous force, as yet, happily, undiscovered by man. Let us supplicate God, the Beloved, that this force be not discovered by science until spiritual civilization shall dominate the human mind. In the hands of men of lower material nature, this power would be able to destroy the whole earth.142

'Abdu'1-Baha spoke these portentous words to the Japanese ambassador to Spain, Viscount Arawaka, for whose country the warning carried grave implications.

An ironic coincidence? If so, it was not the only one. In 1920 'Abdu'1-Baha wrote to a group of young students in Tokyo: 'In Japan the divine proclamation will be heard as a formidable explosion .. .'U3 (I am aware of no other explosion metaphor in the Baha'i writings.) A quarter of a century later, the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were vaporized in the first wartime use of atomic bombs. Today the world's nuclear arsenals contain enough firepower not only to destroy humanity many times over but to alter climate and atmosphere so drastically as to render the planet uninhabitable.

The Challenge of Baha'u'llah, pp. 85-86
It sounds to me like what you mean by ‘really caring’ is to START OFF accepting that god is real and then start searching for texts that appear to support your assumption. That’s not how it works for people who are natural skeptics. I can’t just ‘pretend’ like I think it’s real. I can’t just ‘pretend’ that an accurate prediction must have been divinely revealed by some god being. And I can’t ‘pretend’ that the girl on the dating website is real and try to prove myself worthy of her BEFORE she actually provides evidence that she’s a real person.
I understand what you are saying, but I am not suggesting that you to accept that God is real BEFORE you have proven that to yourself, I am only suggesting that you are open to the possibility. I never believed in God before I became a Baha’i. I never gave it any thought at all because I was not raised with a religion or belief in God. I accepted the religion was true before I really believed in God as I do now, based upon what I read about the religion and based upon what the central figures of the Faith wrote. I assumed God existed but only many decades later did I think about it seriously. It was at that time that I read the Writings of Baha’u’llah and came to understand what a Messenger if God was and how He is related to God. All that is in Gleanings and I read that book at least five times starting about seven years ago. After that I knew for certain that God was real but since then I have been on a journey trying to find out what God wants of me and trying to understand why God does what He does. My searching is far from over.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
I don't think it was Paul's fault. Most Baha'i scholars disagree with Udo Schaeffer. Back when I read it, it seemed convincing to me, but not any more. So does 'Abdu'l-Baha, it appears. See my post on how I see how the doctrine of the Trinity came about for my understanding of how that came about. Of course that's just one doctrine. Paul is misunderstood by Luther and others about salvation by faith alone. Before Luther, that doctrine didn't exist, I don't think.
The way I understood it is that when you add James in there that true faith is going to lead to a person that does the good works. But doing good works doesn't save a person. But Christians have other related problems... I really don't think one Christian would ever consider themselves perfectly sinless. So that would mean that they are all continuing to sin... some more than others. Then there's nominal Christians who don't have very many good works to back up their claim that they believe in Jesus. So for them, they are probably hoping that being saved by faith alone is how it goes. Oh, and then faith in what? That Jesus is God? That the Bible is the infallible, inerrant Word of God? In a young Earth? I guess even being "saved" means a lot to those types of Christians, because they believe that without that saving faith in Jesus a person is going to be sent to hell. But, I think your probably right this was more of a Protestant thing.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
In a Tablet entitled Words of Paradise (written shortly before His passing in 1892), Baha'u'llah noted the rush by Western civilization to develop ever-more-deadly weapons of war. Explaining the urgency of His call for world unity and peace, He declared:

Strange and astonishing things exist in the earth but they are hidden from the minds and the understanding of men. These things are capable of changing the whole atmosphere of the earth and their contamination would prove lethal.141

This reference to 'strange and astonishing things' aptly describes the twin processes of fission and fusion by which we obtain nuclear energy. The reality of such a power was again affirmed in 1911 by 'Abdu'1-Baha:

There is in existence a stupendous force, as yet, happily, undiscovered by man. Let us supplicate God, the Beloved, that this force be not discovered by science until spiritual civilization shall dominate the human mind. In the hands of men of lower material nature, this power would be able to destroy the whole earth.142

'Abdu'1-Baha spoke these portentous words to the Japanese ambassador to Spain, Viscount Arawaka, for whose country the warning carried grave implications.

An ironic coincidence? If so, it was not the only one. In 1920 'Abdu'1-Baha wrote to a group of young students in Tokyo: 'In Japan the divine proclamation will be heard as a formidable explosion .. .'U3 (I am aware of no other explosion metaphor in the Baha'i writings.) A quarter of a century later, the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were vaporized in the first wartime use of atomic bombs. Today the world's nuclear arsenals contain enough firepower not only to destroy humanity many times over but to alter climate and atmosphere so drastically as to render the planet uninhabitable.
So what happened? Not enough people supplicated God, so he let scientists discover nuclear bombs? So now that we have them is there still an urgency for world peace? For some reason I think God is okay with letting people destroy themselves. At least he must be since he allowed it.
 
Top