Unveiled Artist
Veteran Member
The are two but they are also one.
That sounds familiar.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The are two but they are also one.
She does seem a bit upset about sharing Abe, but Hagar is such a harsh sounding name. Sarah sounds so whistle-y and la la. Hagar's got that 'Guh' and that 'Arr' in it, like a pirate named her. Its growly.Please. Sarah was a shrew. I would've dumped her for Hagar.
Life might have sucked for you a little bit back then. We would not send you back in time without a few books to read and some aspirin. Also maybe some crossword puzzles.You're right. As a gentile woman who doesn't want to be enslaved by men, I wouldn't live past sunset....
These are very interesting and horrible parts. I think these actions are not encouraged but are more like horror stories. We men are pretty loathsome sometimes, but we also hate the concept of rape. We are a mixed bag, sort of vicariously self loathing. Anyway...I do not think its meant to justify rape. At least I hope not.The bible specifically has stories where God tells the warriors to take women by force.
I wonder if there are any studies to support this view that conservative women suffer from Stockholm syndrome and that that is what influences their voting records? Can you point me to that research?It's stockholm syndrome. Voting to be enslaved is not admirable.
It is like a family unit.That sounds familiar.
I have never heard that before.In some ancient belief systems the sun was seen as female, and the earth and moon as male.
How about instead of thinking about God as an idea, what about thinking of God as the place where ideas come from?Interesting topic.
In the newest abstract model I was able to think beyond this problem.
The thing we call God is an abstraction, and I see this different now, it's relative and absolute.
I must do a lot of homework coming months on this theme.
If god had been created as a female by the authors of the Bible instead of a male, would women have been treated very differently over the centuries? In my opinion, god was only given the male gender because in the ancient world men were considered to be superior to the female.If any god does exist it is more likely to be genderless.
Women featured in the Bible aren't treated well on the whole, but as reproductive machines for the most part. Solomon's many concubines obviously played a big part in keeping his dangly bits busy! Did they do it willingly, or more likely did they have no say in the matter? Whilst most Christian women these days demand to be treated as equal to men, more extreme male members of the faith still expect them to be subservient to their wishes using the Bible as an excuse.
There is very little woman can't do that men can, and visa versa. You never know, one day men might evolve enough to become pregnant!
Is there anyone on this forum who thinks men and women should stay trapped in the traditional roles society and religion had placed upon them?
That is an opinion. A lot of suppositions on your opening statement but you have every right to have them all.If god had been created as a female by the authors of the Bible instead of a male, would women have been treated very differently over the centuries? In my opinion, god was only given the male gender because in the ancient world men were considered to be superior to the female.If any god does exist it is more likely to be genderless.
Yes, you are correct that many women featured were not treated well. But in the beginning it was not so.Women featured in the Bible aren't treated well on the whole, but as reproductive machines for the most part. Solomon's many concubines obviously played a big part in keeping his dangly bits busy! Did they do it willingly, or more likely did they have no say in the matter?
Women are equal to men. Certainly there are extreme male gendered people who "demand"-- using all types of excuses. Could be by using the Bible (I wonder why you specifically say Bible and not other books too) or they may use other reasons. But just as equally, there are extreme female gendered people who do the same thing using Bibles or using other things. When one wants an excuse, anything can be created.Whilst most Christian women these days demand to be treated as equal to men, more extreme male members of the faith still expect them to be subservient to their wishes using the Bible as an excuse.
This is very true. It was how God had designed it.There is very little woman can't do that men can, and visa versa.
Religion always binds people. Jesus had a big problem with religious people. But one could also say that people can be trapped by their anti-faith positions. It's just however you want to make it.Is there anyone on this forum who thinks men and women should stay trapped in the traditional roles society and religion had placed upon them?
The very first God documented was a female Goddess.If god had been created as a female by the authors of the Bible instead of a male, would women have been treated very differently over the centuries? In my opinion, god was only given the male gender because in the ancient world men were considered to be superior to the female.If any god does exist it is more likely to be genderless.
Women featured in the Bible aren't treated well on the whole, but as reproductive machines for the most part. Solomon's many concubines obviously played a big part in keeping his dangly bits busy! Did they do it willingly, or more likely did they have no say in the matter? Whilst most Christian women these days demand to be treated as equal to men, more extreme male members of the faith still expect them to be subservient to their wishes using the Bible as an excuse.
There is very little woman can't do that men can, and visa versa. You never know, one day men might evolve enough to become pregnant!
Is there anyone on this forum who thinks men and women should stay trapped in the traditional roles society and religion had placed upon them?
G-d wasn't assigned a male gender because G-d is male. G-d was assigned a male gender because Semitic languages are gender specific and the word "god" is masculine.
Yes.Is the word "god" equivalent to the word "g-d"?
We don't pronounce or write G-d's names in Hebrew in mundane circumstances. That just got carried over into English when writing the word "god" when referring to G-d as a way of being respectful.If no, then your argument is moot.
If yes, then why do you use the latter and not the former?
Ciao
- viole
Yes.
We don't pronounce or write G-d's names in Hebrew in mundane circumstances. That just got carried over into English when writing the word "god" when referring to G-d as a way of being respectful.
Its not that that's saying the word is not respectful, but that its a way of showing respect. I don't call my parents by their names out of respect, instead I call them by their titles. With G-d, I take it a step further and avoid calling (or writing) His title in mundane situations.Yes, but why? Is "God" unrespectful?
I can't tell you what my wife is thinking. How should I know what G-d is? I'm not doing it because He told me to, I'm doing it because I want to.And what is G-d thinking about that? Something like: Oh, he used "-" instead of "o". Good b-y. I would be pissed off otherwise.
We never pronounce the Tetragrammaton as its spelled, we replace it with Ad-nai when we need to say it in prayers or studies. And like I said, we only avoid it in mundane situations. Prayer and study are the exceptions.And what do you do when you pray? You say something like "jeoh-ah"?
I do not invoke angels or Lilith, nor do i have the disdain for Yahweh that you have, so it is difficult for me to understand your experience.
Please look at what gender is used to address Yahweh and the angels rather than feminine or gender-neutral terms.
However you run into problems when a person doesn't fit that cookie cutter. We're individuals. I dislike an imposed conformity, it's unfair to those that don't fit into what you personally want.
I value the freedom to chose for oneself what one wants. It is better for everyone to be honest about themselves and find something that fits. However, the problem nowadays is that in a lot of cases, you need two salaries because you can't live off one. That's probably what I'd change about this society (to start with), so that more people have the option to stay at home if that's what makes them feel fulfilled or that two salaries would actually be an advantage.