EvidenceYou have analysed the evidence of an afterlife? How? What?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
EvidenceYou have analysed the evidence of an afterlife? How? What?
It's a link with a lot of specifics. Did you click on it.Specify please
I recognize that you think this sort of thing is compelling.I would prefer to believe the truth than a comfortable fairy tale myself.
I argue that belief in the afterlife is both subjectively and objectively better from my analysis of the (link)afterlife evidence in several subfields of so-called paranormal phenomena.
Maybe the specifics have disappeared because you just jumped from a parallel universe where afterlives are real to one where they aren't. Mandela Effect and all that, right?It's a link with a lot of specifics. Did you click on it.
Specify please
Specify please
And sources of that are...?That quotation is from an unnamed third party, (claimed as a boyhood friend or a fellow student at Tiflis) not from Stalin, it was "re" told many years after said events and after Stalin's death so i take it with a pinch of salt.
Said where? By whom?It was said that Stalin was the only christian in the Kremlin,
I sincerely doubt that. So long as there are riches and land to seek and plunder, human greed will win out. One doesn't need a god to justify taking something from a weaker neighbor, one only needs the might to do so. I'm sure there would be less slaughter through somewhat recent history without Abrahamic religions, but to put such a number on all of religion is quite silly and dramatic, I think.One thing for sure, if there were no religion in history, more than 800 million deaths could have been avoided. I'd count that as a plus for humanity.
And sources of that are...?
Said where? By whom?
I sincerely doubt that. So long as there are riches and land to seek and plunder, human greed will win out. One doesn't need a god to justify taking something from a weaker neighbor, one only needs the might to do so. I'm sure there would be less slaughter through somewhat recent history without Abrahamic religions, but to put such a number on all of religion is quite silly and dramatic, I think.
So then the quote is attributed to Stalin. And as for people who knew him, it's also a well-known fact that those people were all but forced to provide "official" accounts of him to maintain the illusion necessary to the "cult of personality" that was Stalinism. (N. N. Maslov, "Short Course of the History of the All-Russian Communist Party") If they said that he loved moonlit walks on the beach and puppies, it was officially so.One source is Yaroslavsky himself. Who records in his reminiscences how a boyhood friend was shocked to hear young Stalin say, “You know, they are fooling us. There is no God.”
Okay, you gave a great list of Abrahamic wars, with a few smatterings of Hindus and Buddhists. Some of them like the Thirty Years' War could not very strongly be considered "religious wars"; while that war began as a religious spat, it quickly became a continuation of the French-Habsburg rivalry which was about... *drumroll* land. Others you just give entire countries, or people like when you just say "Jews". That tells us little in regards to wars (and with them, especially when you say it doesn't include the actions of Hitler). Others, like the Boxer and Taiping Rebellions, seem more to be wars against religion rather than wars of religion.Wars of religion in which In excess of 800,000,000 deaths occurred.
So then the quote is attributed to Stalin. And as for people who knew him, it's also a well-known fact that those people were all but forced to provide "official" accounts of him to maintain the illusion necessary to the "cult of personality" that was Stalinism. (N. N. Maslov, "Short Course of the History of the All-Russian Communist Party") If they said that he loved moonlit walks on the beach and puppies, it was officially so.
It also still does not follow why a Christian - much less a theist - would work with the League of Militant Atheists to actually destroy religion in the Soviet Union. And one thing that Stalin was, was a Marxist; Marxism being infamously against religion, with Marx himself saying that "Communism begins where atheism begins". Why on earth would a Christian believe that? A Soviet slogan was even "Let us drive out the Capitalists from the earth, and God from Heaven!”
You also mention Pol Pot as being Buddhist, but this is just as fallacious. While he may have been raised Buddhist, this means next to nothing; I was raised Christian, and yet now I am hardly so. Pol Pot himself banned religions - Buddhism included - and violently persecuted them.
Yet again, this does not mean that "atheism leads to violence" or any such statement. It is purely a recognition that people - even atheists - have the potential to be absolutely terrible.
Okay, you gave a great list of Abrahamic wars, with a few smatterings of Hindus and Buddhists. Some of them like the Thirty Years' War could not very strongly be considered "religious wars"; while that war began as a religious spat, it quickly became a continuation of the French-Habsburg rivalry which was about... *drumroll* land. Others you just give entire countries, or people like when you just say "Jews". That tells us little in regards to wars (and with them, especially when you say it doesn't include the actions of Hitler). Others, like the Boxer and Taiping Rebellions, seem more to be wars against religion rather than wars of religion.
I mean, we could also pull up a list of non-religious wars. Philip and Axelrod’s three-volume Encyclopedia of Wars lists 1,763 wars fought throughout human history. Of those, only 123 (7%) are religious in nature.
Look, Stalin may or may not have said it as as child or student, there is no evidence either way. The only records are from third parties after the fact (long time after said events and after his death). And making stupid comments about moonlit walks as comparison is irrelevant.
The word is "nationalism", (god bless America ring any bells?). Bear in mind millions of atheists were also killed or excited to labour camps.
Banning opposition to his rule does not mean Pol Pot was atheist,
"Pol Pot targeted not just different religions as differences, but education, science and medicine too. Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge were composed of Buddhists and Pol Pot himself was a communist and Theravada Buddhist."
Was Pol Pot an atheist? - FreeThoughtPedia
As yet you have made assertions that only make sense to American revisionist history which brands communism as evil (McCarthyism) and anything not American style nationalism as "anti everything we hold dear"
They were all wars started in the name of religion, whether for a particular label or against it.
And it seems the 7% (ill take your word) accounted for over 800 million deaths which was my contention from the beginning. One thing is for sure, given the ubiquitous nature of religion,the vast majority of fighter held some sort of religious fairth.
There's no shortage of world leaders through history who tore down religion to make way for their own.It also still does not follow why a Christian - much less a theist - would work with the League of Militant Atheists to actually destroy religion in the Soviet Union.
So then why didn't Stalin actually eradicate religion? He didn't; he diminished its power and brought it under his control, but his regime ended up officially allowing churches.And one thing that Stalin was, was a Marxist; Marxism being infamously against religion, with Marx himself saying that "Communism begins where atheism begins". Why on earth would a Christian believe that? A Soviet slogan was even "Let us drive out the Capitalists from the earth, and God from Heaven!”
You've asserted that:
1) Stalin was a Christian whilst he was in the Kremlin
2) Pol Pot was a Buddhist whilst in charge of the Khmer Rouge
What evidence would demonstrate to you that they were atheists?
Simple factual evidence.
I guess all the Churches Soso razed means nothing. Or that he implemented a 7 day workweek.Given that both these individuals are dead, you aren't likely to be able to pull a direct question and answer response of "Are you an atheist?" "Yes I am an atheist".
What would therefore constitute "simple factual evidence" in you're view?
So then why didn't Stalin actually eradicate religion? He didn't; he diminished its power and brought it under his control, but his regime ended up officially allowing churches.
Issuing licenses and official approvals to churches, monasteries, priests, etc., doesn't seem like the action of someone who is looking to eradicate all religion. Don't you agree?
I guess all the Churches Soso razed means nothing. Or that he implemented a 7 day workweek.
Given that both these individuals are dead, you aren't likely to be able to pull a direct question and answer response of "Are you an atheist?" "Yes I am an atheist".
What would therefore constitute "simple factual evidence" in you're view?
That's right: it doesn't matter.I guess all the Churches Soso razed means nothing. Or that he implemented a 7 day workweek.