The others lost too. Apparently they weren’t “valid” either.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If Trump loses the election, will he accept it?
- Thread starter fantome profane
- Start date
Argentbear
Well-Known Member
Like how he and his supports accepted his loss last time?
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Trump fake electors plot - Wikipedia
**mod edit**you believe Trump - a man who told thousands of this followers to march on the Capitol building on the day and at the very time that the vote against him was to be ratified while telling them that election was rigged, while writing up a slate of fake electors to be substituted for the real electors - was not making a deliberate effort to hold on to power.
**mod edit**
Last edited by a moderator:
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, they did not. Trump lost 60 times. Those defending the results of the election won 60 times. Both sides do not lose in court cases. What are you drinking tonight?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Maybe we can work out a trade. Oh wait, if Trump loses he is going to prison for a very long time. Sorry, I guess a trade is out of the question.
He tried to get the military to back the coup, they refused. Trump doesn't get credit because his Generals said no. These are the same Generals that today are telling us that he is a fascist, the same Generals that Trump is saying are guilty of treason.
He is ineligible to be President. The Supreme Court ruling didn't suggest anything different; it just ruled that the body that gets to declare his ineligibility is Congress.
... so thrme next time it's likely to come to a head is when the Electoral College votes get counted.
He wasn't the architect of the plan, but every indication is that he was aware of it and approved it.
What scenario for "ordering.the military to keep him in" do you think:
- was actually available to Trump, and
- had - or appeared to Trump to have - a reasonable chance of actually keeping him in power?
It was a coup attempt. Like a lot of things involving Trump, it was poorly planned and executed, but it was a coup attempt.
If the mob had actually succeeded in their aims, Pence would have been killed and Trump would have appointed someone willing to go along with the fake voter scheme in his place.
Trump was instrumental in this plan. The fact that the plan failed before it got to the part that only Trump could have done doesn't change that.
As he did in 2020?
Nah, Republicans have been experimenting with methods to lose.
Trump & Magas Actually Trying To Lose Election
Of course, they really want to win. But it appears that they're losing their grip on reality by living in an echo chamber of increasingly hostile & bigoted speech. It's the new normal...to viciously insult & lie about others. Not so much about campaigning to win...it's become about reveling...
www.religiousforums.com
The only question is whether
they'll fail at their goal of losing.
Wirey
Fartist
I had to look that guy up. Sounds like a wonderful example of animated puppet.
Wirey
Fartist
Trump consistently outperforms polls by about 2%. That is going to be the margin of victory.
I've already laid in a supply of spray on tan that I plan to resell to you Yanks at an incredible mark up.
Fact:
Nigel is no longer used as a name for humans.
It's limited to foppish marionettes.
Two points make a line, not a pattern.
2024 Presidential Election Polls: Harris vs. Trump - 270toWin
View the results of 2024 election polls.
I prefer my pasty shut-in look.
(It's been useful to repel women on the prowl.)
Wirey
Fartist
MAGA supporters hang up on pollsters, because "F%^&$ the gub'mint!" It used to be they didn't bother voting either, because "F%^&$ the gub'mint!" Now they vote, and the polling models are having trouble adjusting. Trust me, Trump has a lead.
Everyone hangs up on pollsters except the elderly white people who are mostly favouring Trump.
It's just that those elderly voters generally have a higher conversion rate from "intend to vote" to "actually vote" than other demographics.
Personally, I think the big factor in critical swing states will be the party that currently controls the state legislature and governorship (and therefore has control over the state's election apparatus): my bet is that in places where Republicans can make it more difficult for Democrats to vote, we'll see Democrats underperform their polling, while in states where Republicans can't do this, the polling will be pretty close to the result at the ballot box.