if we lose religions data

[firedragon]

You didn't miss my link, you chose to ignore it so you could make an unfounded claim based on ignorance

Your links are a google search, and doesnt prove anything you said. That's not research and its evident that you're not here for any valid discussion.

And since you seem to read other peoples minds you think you are God. And no one can compete with that so you win.

Bye.

 

[Brickjectivity]

We will discover logically that there is one Creator in comparison to the size of the universe

Regardless, there is no excuse to blow up the world we have.

 

[Heyo]

How so? One Creative Principle seems more logical than several. One Impetus seems more logical than several Impetuses, yes?

Yes, I agree. But we are not talking about a Creative Principle. We are talking about gods/God. And they come with a lot of baggage. Your God definition may be the "creative principle" and the creative principle only but as soon as you add one other attribute there will be someone who doesn't agree and then you have "two Gods" (differing definitions).
With a creator god that poofed the universe into existence and left, you only get to Deism. For theism and religion you need additional properties. And as these properties are not gained through observation of an objective reality, you necessarily get disagreement.

 

[firedragon]

With a creator god that poofed the universe into existence and left

So thats your personal definition of a creator God?

 

[ChristineM]

I didnt know you were God. Great.

Cheers.

Say what?? For describing your actions and attempts to wriggle out of responsibility for them? My goodness how you are easily deceved into god worship?

 

[ChristineM]

Your links are a google search, and doesnt prove anything you said. That's not research and its evident that you're not here for any valid discussion.

And since you seem to read other peoples minds you think you are God. And no one can compete with that so you win.

Bye.

A google scholar search, please be accurate. And the papers offered up in that google scholar are academic papers based on or including research results.

It is evident that you will not accept responsibility for your documented claim/insult and only want discussion that massages your ego.

No mind reading involved, just analysis of your posts. However,feel free to run away.

 

[firedragon]

A google scholar search, please be accurate. And the papers offered up in that google scholar are academic papers based on or including research results.

It is evident that you will not accept responsibility for your documented claim/insult and only want discussion that massages your ego.

No mind reading involved, just analysis of your posts. However,feel free to run away.

Great thanks.

 

[ChristineM]

Great thanks.

And have you actually opened and studied one (or more) of those academic research papers that you say dont exist?

 

[firedragon]

And have you actually opened and studied one (or more) of those academic research papers that you say dont exist?

Nope. Irrelevant.

 

[ChristineM]

Nope. Irrelevant.

How so, how is child development irrelevant for the development of a child?

This i gotta hear

 

[firedragon]

How so, how is child development irrelevant for the development of a child?

This i gotta hear

That too is irrelevant.

 

[Heyo]

So thats your personal definition of a creator God?

The wording is a bit ... non standard but the concept or definition is that of the deistic god, a god with only one attribute: created the universe.
I don't have a personal definition. To find a definition is the duty of those who believe in the concept. Their inability is the main reason for my position.

 

[firedragon]

The wording is a bit ... non standard but the concept or definition is that of the deistic god, a god with only one attribute: created the universe.
I don't have a personal definition. To find a definition is the duty of those who believe in the concept. Their inability is the main reason for my position.

I understand. Thanks for the response.

I am not very well versed on the deistic theology. Now i must blame you for getting me interested and gifting irregular sleeptime.

Thanks and cheers.

 

[ChristineM]

That too is irrelevant.

So you have nothing, you are not going to just your claim, you are simply attempting (and failing) to mock my intelligence with your nothing. Fair enough.

 

[firedragon]

So you have nothing, you are not going to just your claim, you are simply attempting (and failing) to mock my intelligence with your nothing. Fair enough.

Great. Thanks.

 

[ChristineM]

Great. Thanks.

Glad you agree, i never expected such openness

 

[syo]

I was thinking about whether we had childrens and then left them in a place where they could learn everything except religion or faith

No one will find faith in Jesus
They will not imagine that there is a god who came to earth to sacrifice himself
Likewise, other religions such as Hinduism or some of the Buddhist sects that believe in the incarnation of Deity or even Baha'i

They will never believe in any deity on earth because they will think they are a human element but it is mathematically or educationally superior

But they can easy think about that there is a great Creator outside the field in which they live

This is what I want to deliver
What if a world war occurred or we moved to live on another planet and lost all the information related to the scriptures

All beliefs will disappear, and only faith in the existence of hi Creator, the Risen One, which is the ancient God that Jews and Muslims believe in, will remain.

Faith in Jesus or any faith in human existence on Earth will not survive

Only the belief in the existence of a great supreme creator over the heavens

Children's who grow up without religions will have a questions of where they came from and will not be atheists

The children would rediscovered paganism.

 

[firedragon]

Glad you agree, i never expected such openness

Nice.

 

[ChristineM]

Nice.

Still nothing then?

 

[firedragon]

Still nothing then?

That too is irrelevant.