Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We all have belief in that which cannot be proven, so I don't see a problem.
Some people just enjoy the mythology behind faiths.If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
Wishful thinking?.....in the hope no rational can present God?
Hang around.....the 'problem' will present itself.
what cannot be proven ?If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
Wishful thinking?.....in the hope no rational can present God?
If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
Wishful thinking?.....in the hope no rational can present God?
please explain?
This is not a "religious forum".
It is a "religious education forum".
i quoted wrong sorry
This is not a "religious forum".
It is a "religious education forum".
?? Strange thread i predictDogs and cats have four legs, the dinosaur cat-og is the progenitor, then the squid-monkey.
I don't see how proof is relevant to either belief or disbelief. Theists manage to be theists without proof, atheists manage to be atheists without proof. We all have many beliefs that are not drawn from proof - proof is irrelevant.If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
Wishful thinking?.....in the hope no rational can present God?
There are religions which believe in rationality but not in Gods. That is why. Why do you think religions always have to be irrational?If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
If you can't believe in what cannot be proven.....
What are you doing here in a religious forum?
Wishful thinking?.....in the hope no rational can present God?
But atheism is the default position, the lack-of-opinion that precedes any collection of evidence.I don't see how proof is relevant to either belief or disbelief. Theists manage to be theists without proof, atheists manage to be atheists without proof. We all have many beliefs that are not drawn from proof - proof is irrelevant.
Absolutely.But atheism is the default position, the lack-of-opinion that precedes any collection of evidence.