Il Duce Donald shoves Prime Minister out of his way

[Koldo]

Works for me!

Let's just hope that it doesn't take so long that you die before doing it.

 

[Revoltingest]

Let's just hope that it doesn't take so long that you die before doing it.

I'm already finished....doing nothing, that is.

 

[Koldo]

I'm already finished....doing nothing, that is.

Then stick to doing that. It's the best you have done in our conversation so far.

 

[Revoltingest]

Then stick to doing that. It's the best you have done in our conversation so far.

I know!
Should'a done it earlier, & save us both some time.

 

[leibowde84]

I don't read those "tweet" things, so I don't know what he's up to.
It would be great if he pushed a mime in France though.

So you prefer to be uninformed? Tweeting is, in Trumps own words, how he prefers to communicate with the American people. Thus, his tweets are just as important as anything else. It's important to hold him accountable for them.

 

[YmirGF]

So you prefer to be uninformed? Tweeting is, in Trumps own words, how he prefers to communicate with the American people. Thus, his tweets are just as important as anything else. It's important to hold him accountable for them.

I still think the Secret Service should bar the Twit-in-Chief from Tweeting on Twitter due to national security concerns.

 

[Revoltingest]

So you prefer to be uninformed?

Is it "informed" to seize upon what is likely (according to sources who won't
divulge the evidence), & then treat as inerrant fact? That's just bone headed.
When something is of uncertain cromulence, I'll treat it as just a possibility.
If something is only likely, then it's only likely....not a fact.

Tweeting is, in Trumps own words, how he prefers to communicate with the American people. Thus, his tweets are just as important as anything else. It's important to hold him accountable for them.

What are you seeking here?
I don't read tweets, & haven't even spoken to his accountability for what he says there.
But I'll now state....
If Trump says something, either by word or tweet, he is accountable for what he says.
Does this address your post?

 

[Revoltingest]

I still think the Secret Service should bar the Twit-in-Chief from Tweeting on Twitter due to national security concerns.

They would, but they're busy 'investigating' hookers.

 

[leibowde84]

Is it "informed" to seize upon what is likely (according to sources who won't
divulge the evidence), & then treat as inerrant fact? That's just bone headed.
When something is of uncertain cromulence, I'll treat it as just a possibility.
If something is only likely, then it's only likely....not a fact.

What are you seeking here?
I don't read tweets, & haven't even spoken to his accountability for what he says there.
But I'll now state....
If Trump says something, either by word or tweet, he is accountable for what he says.
Does this address your post?

If the mainstream media just took one sources word for it, I would agree. But they confirm with more than one. Certainly not 100%, but it can't be dismissed altogether.

 

[Revoltingest]

If the mainstream media just took one sources word for it, I would agree. But they confirm with more than one. Certainly not 100%, but it can't be dismissed altogether.

I'm not dismissing the possibility of the Russian gov being behind it at all.
(I've allowed the possibility many times before.)
I dismiss the leap to certainty, particularly when other explanations exist....
- DNC insider
- NGO hackers.