PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
Refined to what and why? And why not simply make the change before we are born?God knows who we are from our premortal life, and knows exactly what experiences we need to refine us.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Refined to what and why? And why not simply make the change before we are born?God knows who we are from our premortal life, and knows exactly what experiences we need to refine us.
I know some Christians believe God sends illness and disability to people to punish them for their 'sins'! How anyone can think that in the 21st century, when we know the cause of many illnesses and disabilities, beggars belief! I even saw stated on a forum once, some 'kind' Christian telling the parent of a disabled child that God was punishing them for their sins. (the parent was no longer a believer!)
Will anyone on this forum admit to thinking God punishes people in this way?
(naturally we can cause some illnesses ourselves by unhealthy living, being obese, drinking in excess, smoking and drug taking)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kathryn
Many Christians (myself included) believe that illness, disabilities and birth defects are the result of sin being present in this world - man's fallen state.
Furthermore, as you stated, unhealthy lifestyles also cause illness and disability - and of course, also birth defects. Often, unhealthy lifestyles are the result of sin. So - in that way, sin causes some illnesses and disabilities.
I don't believe that God uses illness or disability as some sort of punishment - as in, "You are a habitual liar - therefore I'm going to strike you with scoliosis!"
I do believe, however, that God does allow us to sometimes suffer the ramifications of our actions.
What does that mean?
No, the Bible does not teach that God punishes people individually by sending illness to them or their families. What it does teach is that sickness comes with imperfection received by inheritance from our first parents, Adam and Eve. In fact, deadly diseases are often inherited by children from parents. Adam passed on to his unborn offspring the sin and death he and Eve brought upon themselves by rebelling against God. (Romans 5:12) This sin and death has spread to all men. One horrible consequence of this are the many diseases and deformities suffered by so many.
God has promised to remove these illnesses once he has first removed the wicked ones from the Earth. Under God's Kingdom rule "no resident will say: I am sick. The people that are dwelling in [the land] will be those pardoned for their error." (Isaiah 33:24) "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the former heaven and the former earth had passed away... And he [God] will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away. (Revelation 21:1-4)
:sarcastichas this script been posted yet?
(New Testament | John9:1 - 3)
1 AND as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.
2 And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?
3 Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.
the above script is actually one supporting our pre-mortal life.
What a bizarre interpretation. I think a much more reasonable reading is as an expression of incredulity on the part of the disciples. Living in a society that viewed misfortune as the consequences of sin (see Job for the most famous example of this), they were pointing out that this led to an absurd conclusion: "if he's being punished for his sin, how could he have sinned before he was born?"Before our spirits came to Earth, they were in heaven - with our Heavenly Parents... that's why we call Him "Heavenly Father". There are some things in our mortal life that we are given because of things we did in our premortal life - that is why the apostles suggested that the blind man sinned before he was born...
This (sin) introduces imperfection, flaws, etc. into our world - our genes, our philosophies, our value systems, our judgment, our environment, etc.
Refined to what and why? And why not simply make the change before we are born?
However, it is Christian belief that God created everything and that God is good, isn't it? The problem of evil has to be reconciled somehow.If you believe in God or not .
There is no connection between sickness and disability and sin.
It is not even a Christian belief that God would harm anyone for sinning.
I wouldn't say that. I can appreciate the meaning.For those that do not believe in God , even the concept of sin is meaningless.
Indirectly, all illness and disablity are a result of the original sin and fall of mankind and the universe. That is when sin, disease, and sickness started spreading through the whole world hitting the just and unjust alike. And during times of greater sins they spread faster.
:sarcastic
What a bizarre interpretation. I think a much more reasonable reading is as an expression of incredulity on the part of the disciples. Living in a society that viewed misfortune as the consequences of sin (see Job for the most famous example of this), they were pointing out that this led to an absurd conclusion: "if he's being punished for his sin, how could he have sinned before he was born?"
On its face, the passage is no more an endorsement of the idea of a pre-mortal existence than "well, if you didn't take my hammer, did it sprout wings and fly away?" is an endorsement of conscious flying tools.
IOW, it's a rejection of the idea of "premortal life", not an endorsement of it. They're pointing out that in their view, they have a problem: if misfortune is a consequence of sin, then it's either a consequence of the parents' sin, which would have been unjust, or a consequence of the man's own sin, which would have been impossible. Jesus points out to them that there's a third possibility that they didn't consider.
If you want to square this with LDS theology, then you can discount the rejection by noting that it's the often-wrong disciples that make it and not Jesus (though he doesn't seem to worried about correcting them on the point), but still, a straightforward reading of the text gives nothing like the meaning you've assigned to it.
But why would it be necessary to learn self-control when there is no adverse effect to eating the metaphorical chocolate?before we were born, we were pure spirit - no body. We progressed as far as we were able to without a body before we were born. There are many things that can only be learned when spirit is joined to flesh - like self-control (spirits can't eat chocolate ).
And the many many infants who die before anything meaningful can be learnt...?refined to what? refined into a perfect, all-loving, all-knowing, all-powerful being.
Original sin spawned hundreds of species of bacterium and virus? That's a new one.Indirectly, all illness and disablity are a result of the original sin and fall of mankind and the universe. That is when sin, disease, and sickness started spreading through the whole world hitting the just and unjust alike. And during times of greater sins they spread faster.
Not kidding with Jesus, but pointing out that neither obvious alternative "worked" in their minds, yes.so, you don't like the idea of a premortal life, so... the apostles must have just been "joking around" when they said that?
I really don't care. Again: I'm not saying that you shouldn't believe in premortal life. I'm saying that the passage you gave from John 9 is not support for the idea of premortal life. Edit: and note that this is not the same thing as saying that there is no support for the idea of premortal life at all.here are some other scriptures for you about the premortal life... you can decide if these are also just "joking around
But God could have made the world perfect, with no chaotic or damaging elements whatsoever. Why didn't He?
He did, but things changed after the first sin.
No he didn't. Try again.