Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Strange argument, to "lack belief", thats great, but I lack belief in atheism
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You don’t believe the concept of not believing in any gods actually exists? Or you don’t believe there are any people who truly don’t believe in any gods? Or you’re playing a silly word game because you don’t have any real arguments against all those who happen to believe something different to you?Strange argument, to "lack belief", thats great, but I lack belief in atheism
Strange argument, to "lack belief", thats great, but I lack belief in atheism
psssst, don't say that too loud. you'll rile the atheists. some believe a lack of a god, or gods, is lack of beliefs.To be an atheist one has to not believe in God, not lack a belief of atheism.
Of course, gods too.psssst, don't say that too loud. you'll rile the atheists. some believe a lack of a god, or gods, is lack of beliefs.
No... why would it mean that.What is the claim that you lack belief in? As far as I know, atheism can be lack of belief in all the proposed gods. Does that mean that you absolutely believe in all the gods?
WrongThat's kinda weird. Contrarian I guess. Which is fine as a thought exercise, but it has no actual value beyond that.
To paraphrase theist = some form of theistic belief, atheist = no form of theistic belief. Anti-theist believes theism is harmful.
Aatheism is not what you are, my friend. Anti-anti-theist or anti-atheist makes more sense.
The first I understand, though it's not my position. The second would be kinda sad, to be honest.
No, aatheist. Not an atheist.To be an atheist one has to not believe in God, not lack a belief of atheism.
Strange that the idea you use, is now a silly word game. Telling, actually.You don’t believe the concept of not believing in any gods actually exists? Or you don’t believe there are any people who truly don’t believe in any gods? Or you’re playing a silly word game because you don’t have any real arguments against all those who happen to believe something different to you?
That's kinda weird. Contrarian I guess. Which is fine as a thought exercise, but
Aatheism is not what you are, my friend. Anti-anti-theist or anti-atheist
Wrong
psssst, don't say that too loud. you'll rile the atheists. some believe a lack of a god, or gods, is lack of beliefs.
Don't lie to yourself. You wouldn't constantly be making threads trying to poke, prod and provoke atheists if you weren't vexed by their stance of lacking a belief in God... i.e. lacking an object of worship.I dont actually care what you or anyone, worship
.
Don't lie to yourself. You wouldn't constantly be making threads trying to poke, prod and provoke atheists if you weren't vexed by their stance of lacking a belief in God... i.e. lacking an object of worship.
And I would guess that you're probably one of those who believes that we all "worship something", even if that's science or some man-made, material contrivance like money. Although, being a "syncretic", don't you basically hold that all systems of belief point to the same, overall "truth?" So, if youare of the opinion that "atheism" is, itself, a "belief" much like any other, then doesn't that mean you would need to also assimilate atheism into your sycretism?
You didn't answer my question. Exactly what do you actually mean by "aatheist"?Strange that the idea you use, is now a silly word game. Telling, actually.