• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I'm an aatheist. I lack belief in atheism.

LukeS

Active Member
People have their causes for lacking belief, usually other beliefs which are not made explicit.
 

Jumi

Well-Known Member
What is the claim that you lack belief in? As far as I know, atheism can be lack of belief in all the proposed gods. Does that mean that you absolutely believe in all the gods?
 

Terese

Mangalam Pundarikakshah
Staff member
Premium Member
To be an atheist one has to not believe in God, not lack a belief of atheism.
 

HonestJoe

Well-Known Member
Strange argument, to "lack belief", thats great, but I lack belief in atheism
You don’t believe the concept of not believing in any gods actually exists? Or you don’t believe there are any people who truly don’t believe in any gods? Or you’re playing a silly word game because you don’t have any real arguments against all those who happen to believe something different to you?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Strange argument, to "lack belief", thats great, but I lack belief in atheism

That's kinda weird. Contrarian I guess. Which is fine as a thought exercise, but it has no actual value beyond that.

To paraphrase theist = some form of theistic belief, atheist = no form of theistic belief. Anti-theist believes theism is harmful.

Aatheism is not what you are, my friend. Anti-anti-theist or anti-atheist makes more sense.

The first I understand, though it's not my position. The second would be kinda sad, to be honest.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
To be an atheist one has to not believe in God, not lack a belief of atheism.
psssst, don't say that too loud. you'll rile the atheists. some believe a lack of a god, or gods, is lack of beliefs.
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
That's kinda weird. Contrarian I guess. Which is fine as a thought exercise, but it has no actual value beyond that.

To paraphrase theist = some form of theistic belief, atheist = no form of theistic belief. Anti-theist believes theism is harmful.

Aatheism is not what you are, my friend. Anti-anti-theist or anti-atheist makes more sense.

The first I understand, though it's not my position. The second would be kinda sad, to be honest.
Wrong
 
Last edited:

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
You don’t believe the concept of not believing in any gods actually exists? Or you don’t believe there are any people who truly don’t believe in any gods? Or you’re playing a silly word game because you don’t have any real arguments against all those who happen to believe something different to you?
Strange that the idea you use, is now a silly word game. Telling, actually.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
I dont actually care what you or anyone, worship
.
Don't lie to yourself. You wouldn't constantly be making threads trying to poke, prod and provoke atheists if you weren't vexed by their stance of lacking a belief in God... i.e. lacking an object of worship.

And I would guess that you're probably one of those who believes that we all "worship something", even if that's science or some man-made, material contrivance like money. Although, being a "syncretic", don't you basically hold that all systems of belief point to the same, overall "truth?" So, if youare of the opinion that "atheism" is, itself, a "belief" much like any other, then doesn't that mean you would need to also assimilate atheism into your sycretism?
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
Don't lie to yourself. You wouldn't constantly be making threads trying to poke, prod and provoke atheists if you weren't vexed by their stance of lacking a belief in God... i.e. lacking an object of worship.

What? That is just nonsense, you should rewrite that.

And I would guess that you're probably one of those who believes that we all "worship something", even if that's science or some man-made, material contrivance like money. Although, being a "syncretic", don't you basically hold that all systems of belief point to the same, overall "truth?" So, if youare of the opinion that "atheism" is, itself, a "belief" much like any other, then doesn't that mean you would need to also assimilate atheism into your sycretism?

That isn't what syncretic means.

That is a specific type of universalism.
 
Top