firedragon
Veteran Member
Nope
You are wrong. Knowing, but cheaply saying "nope" is your way. Good to know, whoever you are.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope
Mary was perfect?
Nope
Then it is about Jesus' birth being free from "original sin?" I see.The first para you have written is indeed completely wrong, as other posts in this thread have made clear.
The second has a fair amount of truth in it, so long as you do not use the term "immaculate" in this context, because that just perpetuates the ignorance and misunderstanding about the immaculate conception that those of us who know what it is have been trying to dispel.
It is well to remember that sex has never been officially considered unclean in itself. After all, sex and procreation are largely the point of traditional Christian marriage.
Because it's the main point the dogma addresses. The Immaculate Conception is the Catholic dogma that Mary as Mother of God was except from original sin from the moment of her conception. The dogma does not claim that Mary was conceived without sexual intercourse.It wasn't me who brought original sin into the topic; I was just responding.
Yes.Mary was perfect?
It's not a great story, is it?Because it's the main point the dogma addresses. The Immaculate Conception is the Catholic dogma that Mary as Mother of God was except from original sin from the moment of her conception. The dogma does not claim that Mary was conceived without sexual intercourse.
Yes.
Well at least you know now, don't you? So that's a small improvement.Then it is about Jesus' birth being free from "original sin?" I see.
To my mind, that idea, of course, presents its own problems - such as solidifying the idea of "original sin" being borne down through the progeny of man willy nilly - like being held accountable for the credit debt of your parents... or some guy from a bar fight your dad once had coming to beat you up because your dad is now dead and can no longer bear the brunt of this other man's desire for vengeance. Amazing how easy it is to see the folly in such an idea when one thinks for just a few seconds, and yet how easily it seems to have been written into the mythos of Christianity.
I also really enjoy how you qualified the idea of sex being unclean with "never been officially considered." Unofficially? Yes... I am sure we can all admit that that is a different story. Hence the very reason for the "perpetuation of ignorance and misunderstanding about the immaculate conception." I myself was entirely ignorant, I readily admit... and with the cultural issue that many Christians tend to take with sex, I very, very likely won't be the last.
Clutter in the head is what it is. Would be useless if it weren't for all those others out there who insist that it is important.Well at least you know now, don't you? So that's a small improvement.
I didn't say otherwise."Immaculate Conception" is a Marian doctrine that Mary was born without the effects or inheritance of the Original Sin.
Not Jesus.
If you believe God is holy then it follows that the one creature with the privilege of carrying God himself in her womb would herself need to be free from all stain of sin.
Because God is holy. Therefore it was fitting that the one person destined to carry the incarnate Word in her womb be free from all stain from sin. Mary was free from original sin. She was still fully human. After all, Adam and Eve were created without original sin, yet no one denies their humanity.Why? God chose to enter humanity. Why require a vessel that was not fully human?
Nestorianism is a heresy. There is no human Jesus and divine Jesus. There is only Jesus, fully human and fully God. Therefore, since Jesus is God and Mary is his mother, Mary is properly called Mother of God. IMO any attempt to deny Mary as Mother of God denies the full divinity of Christ.As to the Mother of God thing, Mary was the mother of the human person of Jesus, not the Mother of God. She had no generative role in the existence of God or the divinity of Jesus.
Sorry, but the ancient faith is very clear otherwise. And the belief in Mary's perpetual virginity is not a denigration of women but an exultation of Mary as the greatest of God's creatures. There is no sex in Heaven, so it would have been utterly unbecoming for either our Lord or his mother (the Queen of Heaven) to be touched by the slightest hint of concupiscent desire.I find the nonscriptural doctrine that Mary never had sex with her husband a reflection of the church's poor view of women.
What does it mean to u?
I think it means Jesus was born of god and just appeared.
no mommy involved
hey he rose from the dead too so why not right?
Now do I believe this meaning?
That’s another story
What does it mean to u?
I think it means Jesus was born of god and just appeared.
no mommy involved
hey he rose from the dead too so why not right?
Now do I believe this meaning?
That’s another story
What does it mean to u?
I think it means Jesus was born of god and just appeared.
no mommy involved
hey he rose from the dead too so why not right?
Now do I believe this meaning?
That’s another story