In what religion is god flawed?

[turk179]

No more than the idea of meatloaf proves there to be a god, i reckon.

I don't know. I think he was pretty close to being god like when he did the first Bat Out of Hell Album.

I do not think that any of the religions are flawed in their concept of God because all the religions in my opinion have the same intent; to better mankind through kindness and love. No flaw in that in my opinion.

 

[Don Penguinoini]

People who have checked, hinduism, why so?

 

[Logical]

God is a flawed concept, therefore ALL religions that embrace a god have a flawed god.

 

[gnostic]

Couldn't we chalk all of that down to interpretation?

Of course. At the end of the day, it's all we do here at RF - interpret.

 

[Jistyr]

God is a flawed concept, therefore ALL religions that embrace a god have a flawed god.

What makes the concept of God flawed? Do not simply make the claim, support it.

 

[blackout]

Any concept of God that is not your own,
is flawed (for you).

Can a "religion's" concept of "God"
ever truly be your own?

After all, it is the religion's concept.
Not your own.

For me personally,
it is unequivocally impossible.

 

[Logical]

What makes the concept of God flawed? Do not simply make the claim, support it.

It was simply made up and there is absolutely no evidence that a god exists or has existed.

 

[kai]

It was simply made up and there is absolutely no evidence that a god exists or has existed.

well can you source that claim for me? i would like very much to see your evidence.

 

[kai]

you see i have great difficulty in beleiving in god, but i could never say there isnt one because i cannot span the cosmos and reach backwards and forwards in time to check out my statement.

 

[Sunstone]

It was simply made up and there is absolutely no evidence that a god exists or has existed.

That's "God 101"

"God 102" is "Does it matter whether a god ontologically exists or not?"

Welcome to the Forum.

 

[rheff78]

It was simply made up and there is absolutely no evidence that a god exists or has existed.

This goes back to the Burden of Proof thread. I agree with kai, show me evidence that he DOESN'T exist to support your claim.

 

[sandandfoam]

It's all about ones perspective isn't it?

 

[kai]

It's all about ones perspective isn't it?

what is ?or are you thinking out loud

 

[McBell]

This goes back to the Burden of Proof thread. I agree with kai, show me evidence that he DOESN'T exist to support your claim.

You are mistaking a claim for a conclusion.
The claim is that God exists.
Since there is no evidence for that claim, many people conclude that there is no God.
What is the 'proof' for this conclusion?
The fact that there is NO evidence to support the claim that God exists

 

[McBell]

It's all about ones perspective isn't it?

Nope.
It is about getting the claim and conclusion right.
see my previous post. #54

 

[rheff78]

Like I said, show me that God doesn't exist.

 

[McBell]

Like I said, show me that God doesn't exist.

Like I said, support your claim God does exist.

Or perhaps you prefer this wording:

Prove that the conclusion reached by many that God does not exist is in error.​

 

[Lucian]

I think pretty much all of them have a flawed view in some way.

I don't believe that God is flawed though.

 

[Don Penguinoini]

Ill ask again, people who have ticked the HINDUISM box, why so? Please do explain, otherwise then your vote is nothing short of useless.

 

[Logical]

This goes back to the Burden of Proof thread. I agree with kai, show me evidence that he DOESN'T exist to support your claim.

Prove to me that he does exist and then I won't talk.