• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Increasing Risk

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Here's hoping that those who failed to provide proper
security are so embarrassed & worried about their
jobs that they prepare appropriately for Jan 20.

Where's the fingers crossed frube when you need it... I hope you will settle for a winner?
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm concerned about the rally that is set for January 17. The Trumpists will be there again. They feel emboldened by their 'success' on the 6th.

The good side is that people are now taking them seriously and there *may* be an adequate police presence.

My concern is that the rioters may be supported by too many in the police force or the national guard. If those groups don't do their job, we will have a full-fledged coup.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
A bit of history for the "Thank God it's all behind us crowd."

Mein Kampf was written by a grotesque narcissist jailed for a failed coup attempt.

The one comforting thing about that is that Trump is much older than Hitler was when he eventually took power.

More concerning is that there are politicians that are much smarter than Trump and are going for the support of his base (Cruz, for example).

This is very far from being over.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
I'm concerned about the rally that is set for January 17. The Trumpists will be there again. They feel emboldened by their 'success' on the 6th.

The good side is that people are now taking them seriously and there *may* be an adequate police presence.

My concern is that the rioters may be supported by too many in the police force or the national guard. If those groups don't do their job, we will have a full-fledged coup.
A full-fledged attempted coup, surely?
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
It seems to me the risk of further shenanigans increases each day. That is, the closer we get to Trump's last moment in power, the more at risk we are that he'll want to tear down another pillar or two holding up our country. Nothing is for certain, but I think the risks are increasing.

I don't know if anyone else is thinking along the same lines as I am, but I thought I should mention my thoughts to you as something you might want to think about. Make of them what you will.
Quickly putting the people likely to participate in a second coup attempt on the no-fly list would help: it would stop a lot of them from getting to DC (though it probably wouldn't do much for the attacks on state legislatures we also saw on Wednesday).

It's a bit hazy to me about whether this is already happening. The authorities who maintain the actual list are always a bit opaque about how it's generated or who's on it. Apart from that, I'm getting conflicting information:

On one side, they're saying that the no-fly list isn't really set up for domestic terrorism, and this likely won't change until after the inauguration.

On the other side, we have this video that purports to show one of the Capitol rioters in tears after being denied on his flight because he's now on the no-fly list.

... so at this point, I don't know what to think.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Quickly putting the people likely to participate in a second coup attempt on the no-fly list would help: it would stop a lot of them from getting to DC (though it probably wouldn't do much for the attacks on state legislatures we also saw on Wednesday).

It's a bit hazy to me about whether this is already happening. The authorities who maintain the actual list are always a bit opaque about how it's generated or who's on it. Apart from that, I'm getting conflicting information:

On one side, they're saying that the no-fly list isn't really set up for domestic terrorism, and this likely won't change until after the inauguration.

On the other side, we have this video that purports to show one of the Capitol rioters in tears after being denied on his flight because he's now on the no-fly list.

... so at this point, I don't know what to think.
They could do worse than ban anyone with a beard from flying. That would catch 80% of them. :D

Why do all these f***ers have beards?
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
I do not recall which MSNBC pundit originated the comment, but it deserves to be understood for all that it portends. The comment was:

There is a new lost cause narrative in this country.

Please give serious thought to what this means.
 

joe1776

Well-Known Member
I think the ugliest, most morally rotten sides of Trump's base will continue to unravel within the next few weeks or months. He is but one lone, old lunatic; the primary issue is his millions of misinformed and extremely bigoted followers. They will undoubtedly outlast him and Biden, and unless the U.S. undergoes significant cultural or political reform, I expect the problem to last several years or more.
You're right, of course.

Bigotry is a human, world-wide problem. It's diminishing slowly over the years but will remain a problem for many years to come.

Donald Trump didn't create the problem for America. All he did was to give bigots the notion that they are right and that their arrogant attitude was socially acceptable. Dumping Donald will hamper their social acceptance but will do nothing to make bigots go away.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
It seems to me the risk of further shenanigans increases each day. That is, the closer we get to Trump's last moment in power, the more at risk we are that he'll want to tear down another pillar or two holding up our country. Nothing is for certain, but I think the risks are increasing.

I don't know if anyone else is thinking along the same lines as I am, but I thought I should mention my thoughts to you as something you might want to think about. Make of them what you will.
more than ever......we should abolish the two party system

most of the squabble is......us vs. them
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Where's the fingers crossed frube when you need it... I hope you will settle for a winner?
It's the rainbow frubal...the <optimistic> one.

It appears that Capitol Police Chief Sund was denied
the requested back-up he wanted a couple days in
advance.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...2ce7d4-5384-11eb-a817-e5e7f8a406d6_story.html
Excerpted....
Jan. 10, 2021 at 11:38 p.m. EST
Add to list
Two days before Congress was set to formalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory, Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was growing increasingly worried about the size of the pro-Trump crowds expected to stream into Washington in protest.
To be on the safe side, Sund asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the D.C. National Guard be placed on standby in case he needed quick backup.

Yet Pelosi wanted his head on the chopping block.
https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/pelosi-demands-resignation-of-capitol-police-chief-after-dc-protests/
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Or instead of abolishing it, just remove impediments to 3rd parties.
too shallow

the herd moves as it has for sooooooo many genereations
and now stampedes are coming up

you need to blow off the old labels and raise a new flag

America is an economically based society

I might be inclined to vote another business man into office
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
too shallow

the herd moves as it has for sooooooo many genereations
and now stampedes are coming up

you need to blow off the old labels and raise a new flag

America is an economically based society

I might be inclined to vote another business man into office
How would we go about abolishing the 2-party system?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
How would we go about abolishing the 2-party system?
the ballot would be sent to your residence
no mention of party line

the ballot would be sent to American addresses long standing
voter id assured

the politicians would address issuses of concern......party line NOT allowed
any topic.....fine

it really is that simple
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
the ballot would be sent to your residence
no mention of party line

the ballot woudl be sent to American addresses long standing
voter id assured

the politicians would address issuses of concern......party line NOT allowed
any topic.....fine

it really is that simple
People would know party affiliation of the candidates anyway.
And I don't think Ameristan will ever accept voter ID. It would
be decried as racist or anti-poor or anti-immigrant.
 
Top