INDISPUTABLE Rational Proof That God Exists (Or Existed)

[FranklinMichaelV.3]

So you are getting the point?

Back to topic now?

No, you just never presented one.

You only see 7 billion souls, I see more.

 

[Thief]

No, you just never presented one.

You only see 7 billion souls, I see more.

False accusation on your part.

 

[FranklinMichaelV.3]

False accusation on your part.

Would you like me to provide a quote?

 

[Thief]

No, you just never presented one.

You only see 7 billion souls, I see more.

Your accusation of shortsightedness...is false.

 

[FranklinMichaelV.3]

Your accusation of shortsightedness...is false.

Ah so you see more than 7billion souls right now at the moment? I'm not talking about what will come in the future. I'm talking about right now. Are there only 7billions souls.

 

[ladybug77]

Ah so you see more than 7billion souls right now at the moment? I'm not talking about what will come in the future. I'm talking about right now. Are there only 7billions souls.

I said 7 generations. 7cycles if you will. Until we are left with nothing but boys. And we cannot continue to strive. Then God takes us.

 

[Thief]

Ah so you see more than 7billion souls right now at the moment? I'm not talking about what will come in the future. I'm talking about right now. Are there only 7billions souls.

So...you...would be the shortsighted one?

 

[FranklinMichaelV.3]

I said 7 generations. 7cycles if you will. Until we are left with nothing but boys. And we cannot continue to strive. Then God takes us.

that was to you but thank you

 

[Monk Of Reason]

Define? or just draw a line?
How about the difference between you and a rock?....or a pile of dust?

Evidence required?
That you post in response is a sign of your spirit.

So you are equating spirit to senteience or intellegence? Because what you imply as sentience or intellengence I think is not what you are trying to present as "spirit". Do you have evidence that sentience or intellegnece are something other than simply that?

 

[Thief]

So you are equating spirit to senteience or intellegence? Because what you imply as sentience or intellengence I think is not what you are trying to present as "spirit". Do you have evidence that sentience or intellegnece are something other than simply that?

Someone once said...I think, therefore I am.
He was considered a great philosopher.

God is not allowed to say?.....'I AM!'

 

[Enai de a lukal]

Someone once said...I think, therefore I am.
He was considered a great philosopher.

God is not allowed to say?.....'I AM!'

This is completely irrelevant to the question it was purportedly a reply to (as per usual).

 

[Thief]

This is completely irrelevant to the question it was purportedly a reply to (as per usual).

So you didn't understand the answer...as per usual.

 

[Enai de a lukal]

So you didn't understand the answer...as per usual.

Oh I understood the answer perfectly- which is why I pointed out that it was one of your standard non-answers.

 

[Enai de a lukal]

"But"...perhaps..."you"...could...expand..."on"...it...if..."you"...think...it..."helps"...you...in..."some?"...!way;..!/:

 

[Thief]

"But"...perhaps..."you"...could...expand..."on"...it...if..."you"...think...it..."helps"...you...in..."some?"...!way;..!/:

Nice rebuttal...so 'useful'?

Why not attempt something greater?

 

[Enai de a lukal]

Nice rebuttal...so useful?

Not a rebuttal, an offer for you to try to come up with a more pertinent reply.

 

[Enai de a lukal]

To refresh your memory, the question was this-

So you are equating spirit to senteience or intellegence? Because what you imply as sentience or intellengence I think is not what you are trying to present as "spirit". Do you have evidence that sentience or intellegnece are something other than simply that?

 

[Monk Of Reason]

Someone once said...I think, therefore I am.
He was considered a great philosopher.

God is not allowed to say?.....'I AM!'

He is allowed. He hasn't...so...can we do the inverse? If god cannot say or we cannot provided evidence that he has said it...can we assume he does not exist?

 

[Thief]

He is allowed. He hasn't...so...can we do the inverse? If god cannot say or we cannot provided evidence that he has said it...can we assume he does not exist?

And God said to Moses as Moses did ask a name....
'Tell the people..."I AM!"...and they that understand will know whose law this is.'

 

[Thief]

Not a rebuttal, an offer for you to try to come up with a more pertinent reply.

Then step up and make a point.
Your previous and shallow notations are not sufficient.