We have been using rape as an example of an immoral act, and one of the things "masochists" do is to pretend to be the victim of rape.
As I noted, I recall posts where you said certain things to me suggesting that what I had posted was in some way wrong or bad. As I recall, I was merely providing information on the ineffectiveness of psychiatric drugs, maybe especially antidepressant drugs, and, further, the evidence that such drugs actually just make people worse by inducing chronicity and a number of other adverse effects, such as inducing weight gain. You certainly gave me the impression that you didn't approve of me posting what I had posted (which was actually just some facts from the peer-reviewed literature). If someone (like me) dissuades another person from taking antidepressants, there's nothing wrong or bad about that, is there?
It seems that you don't understand the moral nihilist position.
Nihilism (from the German "nihil" - "nothing) is a philosophical school that has various branches. Anyway, moral nihilism is the position that there is no absolute or objective foundation for morality, so it's impossible to posit moral truths.
From Wikipedia:
"Moral nihilism (also known as ethical nihilism) is the meta-ethical view that nothing is intrinsically moral or immoral. For example, a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is neither inherently right nor inherently wrong. Moral nihilists consider morality to be constructed, a complex set of rules and recommendations that may give a psychological, social, or economical advantage to its adherents, but is otherwise without universal or even relative truth in any sense.[1]
Moral nihilism is distinct from moral relativism, which does allow for actions to be right or wrong relative to a particular culture or individual, and moral universalism, which holds actions to be right or wrong in the same way for everyone everywhere. Insofar as only true statements can be known, moral nihilism implies moral skepticism."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_nihilism
Basically, it's a position of skepticism towards and refutation of positions that claim that there is somehow some universal moral order that can be adduced from, for example, the natural world or philosophy.
That does not mean that a moral nihilist would view all actions as conducive to well-being and that we just don't care. It just means that we recognize that whatever moral and ethical opinions we may hold are just subjective and have no foundation in any sort of truth claim. (Philosophical truth is not the same as "fact", by the way.) For example, we would still have our own preferences and goals, and perhaps a vision of how we would like society to be. But we just accept that those are merely products of our animal minds, with no foundation beyond that.
In expressivism:
"We are not making an effort to describe the way the world is. We are not trying to report on the moral features possessed by various actions, motives, or policies. Instead, we are venting our emotions, commanding others to act in certain ways, or revealing a plan of action. When we condemn torture, for instance, we are expressing our opposition to it, indicating our disgust at it, publicizing our reluctance to perform it, and strongly encouraging others not to go in for it. We can do all of these things without trying to say anything that is true."
So my displeasure at you counseling those on psychiatric drugs to stop taking them would just me expressing my own subjective opinion that them heeding your advice would not be conducive to their well-being. I cannot say that it is morally right or wrong, though.
As for rape, I cannot point to some abstract moral order whether in the natural world or in theological terms to assert that rape is inherently wrong, because I do not recognize moral features in the universe. There is nothing in the universe that tells me that rape is inherently wrong. The universe does not seem to care one way or another about our existence, let alone our well-being or wishes. As for deities, the same lack of evidence for a deity caring one way or another about how we behave is the same as the universe - nil (you could argue that, if they exist, then their opinion is also just subjective, especially in polytheistic systems). But I could assert that it's not desirable out of a feeling of empathy, the evidence of probable physical and mental harm that it results in and a desire to have an orderly society. When it comes to people who lack empathy towards others, I could attempt to dissuade them from raping another person because of the likely consequences their actions would have on their own well-being (i.e. they're very likely to end up in jail, socially maligned, etc.).
