• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Insulting?

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
The first and most obvious insult is that anyone who believes in God is mentally deficient.
I think it lies more with how that belief is carried out and demonstrated.

Take snake handlers for instance. I have no problems at all viewing them as being mentally deficient. Its not the belief in God, it's the sheer stupidity.
 

dgirl1986

Big Queer Chesticles!
a conversation between A and B.
A: B is stupid.
B: I don't think so.

Therefor A is not insult B?

For example?

I think I made a type in my original response. It should have said it is not an insult.

Someone can think those things all they want, I am not going to be insulted. However, if someone screams at me from across the street that I am a dirty homo that needs to burn in hell because I am an abomination and deviant that deserves to die, I may get insulted. Just maybe.
 

Pudding

Well-Known Member
I think I made a type in my original response. It should have said it is not an insult.

Someone can think those things all they want, I am not going to be insulted. However, if someone screams at me from across the street that I am a dirty homo that needs to burn in hell because I am an abomination and deviant that deserves to die, I may get insulted. Just maybe.
Thanks for the explain.
 

Pudding

Well-Known Member
I am not understanding the question in the OP.
I mean, when some believer using their religion's [moral/law] to [judge/comdemn/preaching] to non-believer, is the [judge/comdemn/preaching] itself sometimes filling with insult towards the non-believer?

Some example:
Non-believer are evil; sinner; immoral; abomination; blind for not seeing a specific god's existence... etc.
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I mean, when some believer using their religion's [moral/law] to [judge/comdemn/preaching] to non-believer, is the [judge/comdemn/preaching] itself sometimes filling with insult towards the non-believer?

Some example:
Non-believer are evil; sinner; immoral; abomination; blind for not seeing a specific god's existence... etc.
Moral judgements, necessary as they are, always have to deal with such a risk.

Which is why judging disbelief itself is so dangerous and weird.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Why should you care so much about what people of faith think.
It's not about what people think. It's about what people say. And there's waaaaay too much "speaking one's mind" being put out there. In a world that is becoming increasingly small and diverse, respect and tact are extremely important.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I agree it could be an insult if it had any ring of possible truth to it. On the other hand, a person is free to take whatever is said about them, no matter how innocuous or silly, as an insult. So I guess even if there's no possible truth to it, if a person cares enough what someone says about them it can be regarded as an insult. Personally, if I was a theist or deist and someone said that anyone who believes in God is mentally deficient, I would find it far more amusing than insulting. But to each his own.
No -- not "to each his own." We have to learn how to care for each other -- not judge and deride each other. Insult is insult; it's poor form, and it's hurtful -- no matter how thick one's skin is.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Dangerous it can be. But it is weird in what aspect?
More often than not it looks suspiciously close to people deciding that they know better than the very Creator God they believe in when it comes to how necessary it is for unbelievers to be convinced.
 

Pudding

Well-Known Member
More often than not it looks suspiciously close to people deciding that they know better than the very Creator God they believe in when it comes to how necessary it is for unbelievers to be convinced.
The intentions/reason why those believer do/think so, can be in many different ways. Suspicious or not it may hard to determine. But skeptical about the beliefs when one see no good reasons/evidence/proof to believe so, maybe is a logical decision.
 

Pudding

Well-Known Member
The same can be said about anal sex ?
What do you mean?

Yes to some believers you are heathen and in an Islamic world you would be beheaded , so what get over it ).
This is a discussion, i understand that if people think this topic is unimportant/meaningless to them then they need not to participate in it. Or that they think it's not a big problem and already get over it.

But for those people who're interested in this topic, they can continue to participate in. Their interest for this topic doesn't automatically means that interest is bad/immature to need them to "get over it".
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
The same can be said about anal sex ?
Yes to some believers you are heathen and in an Islamic world you would be beheaded , so what get over it ).

Could you please provide a source for the Islamic part?

My information is that it is not allowed only. No heathen-ry and no beheading.
 

Smart_Guy

...
Premium Member
I meant not allowed by Islamic teachings not by a country. This is one of those sins that have no punishment in this life.
 
Top