Jumi
Well-Known Member
I was actually supporting your argument here, not disagreeing. It's nice to agree!I meant not allowed by Islamic teachings not by a country. This is one of those sins that have no punishment in this life.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was actually supporting your argument here, not disagreeing. It's nice to agree!I meant not allowed by Islamic teachings not by a country. This is one of those sins that have no punishment in this life.
I knew your reply was in my favor. I just had fears what I said was understood differentlyI was actually supporting your argument here, not disagreeing. It's nice to agree!
I understand what you mean. There's sometimes that doubt that people take what we say the wrong way, especially when we're speaking in foreign language here.I knew your reply was in my favor. I just had fears what I said was understood differently
It is a specific psychological problem I have, really. I worry too much at how other perceive my actions. I worry too much that they would misunderstand me. This makes me extend explanations often.I understand what you mean. There's sometimes that doubt that people take what we say the wrong way, especially when we're speaking in foreign language here.
Don't let anyone get away with bologna like this!!Is some believer using their religion's moral/law to judge/comdemn/preaching to non-believer itself sometimes filling with insult?
You're evil.
You're sinner.
You're immoral.
You're abomination.
You're blind for not seeing a specific god's existence.
... etc
I know man, I know you worry too much. I always found your style pleasant and something most of us can learn from.It is a specific psychological problem I have, really. I worry too much at how other perceive my actions. I worry too much that they would misunderstand me. This makes me extend explanations often.
By the way, I don't mind disagreement. I'm always open to respectful disagreement and criticism
Alan Henning ?Could you please provide a source for the Islamic part?
My information is that it is not allowed only. No heathen-ry and no beheading.
Nope, this is Smart GuyAlan Henning ?
Me too Smart Guy but to be honest, I have not seen a lot of respectful disagreement here of late. Mostly all I am seeing is proselytizing and people being rude to others. What is up with that my friend?It is a specific psychological problem I have, really. I worry too much at how other perceive my actions. I worry too much that they would misunderstand me. This makes me extend explanations often.
By the way, I don't mind disagreement. I'm always open to respectful disagreement and criticism
What do you mean?Don't let anyone get away with bologna like this!!
Me too Smart Guy but to be honest, I have not seen a lot of respectful disagreement here of late. Mostly all I am seeing is proselytizing and people being rude to others. What is up with that my friend?
If someone is using their religious beliefs as a weapon to judge others with, they need a reality check.What do you mean?
This is how I try to be here as well Smart Guy and it has afforded me the opportunity to call quite a few here friends, albeit board friends. And why not? I don't care if one is Jewish, Muslim, Christian or pink with purple polka dots. I just want kind and friendly debate without rancor. I guess for some that is a difficult task.Yes, I've bee thru some of those too. I guess it is easier to notice disrespect and have its effect haunting us. It puzzles me too seeing that kinda behavior by supposedly civilized individuals.
But I will not let that allow me to get out of character and ignore my nature and teachings in tolerating disrespect. Who knows, maybe tolerance would get something good thru to the disrespectful. I also won't allow it to forget the good RF people that chose to take the respectful approach. Those good people know themselves very well
Amen. Yet another SFM card my dear.If someone is using their religious beliefs as a weapon to judge others with, they need a reality check.
If some people disagree with the beliefs's claims and have reasonable argument that why they think so, plus have the interest to voice their opinion againts it, i think it's reasonable for them to do so.If someone is using their religious beliefs as a weapon to judge others with, they need a reality check.
That is all well and good, but I think that anyone who uses religious beliefs to condemn others, using words like "abomination" or attempt to speak for God, the only honorable/reasonable reaction is absolute ridicule. We don't have to put up with hateful dogma anymore. The old notion that religious beliefs must be accepted as a part of society is dying off ... and I couldn't be more happy about that.If some people disagree with the beliefs's claims and have reasonable argument that why they think so, plus have the interest to voice their opinion againts it, i think it's reasonable for them to do so.
How does a believer preach to non-believer (intentions is to help non-believer) without condemn/hateful dogma when this condemn/hateful dogma is from their religion god's words, or is from their interpretation to their god's words which this interpretation is inspire/enlighten/guide by their god?That is all well and good, but I think that anyone who uses religious beliefs to condemn others, using words like "abomination" or attempt to speak for God, the only honorable/reasonable reaction is absolute ridicule. We don't have to put up with hateful dogma anymore. The old notion that religious beliefs must be accepted as a part of society is dying off ... and I couldn't be more happy about that.
If they are allowed to condemn others for breaking rules that go against their subjective religious beliefs, it is only fair that I should be able to condemn/ridicule them for holding discriminatory views based on nothing more than faith. It would be completely unreasonable any other way. They are of course free to "preach", but I am free to "preach" as well, right? In the same way that they are trying to "help" homosexuals by teaching them that God doesn't like their way of life, I am trying to "help" them by pointing out that their subjective belief about God's will is misguided.How does a believer preach to non-believer (intentions is to help non-believer) without condemn/hateful dogma when this condemn/hateful dogma is from their religion god's words, or is from their interpretation to their god's words which this interpretation is inspire/enlighten/guide by their god?
You're right.If they are allowed to condemn others for breaking rules that go against their subjective religious beliefs, it is only fair that I should be able to condemn/ridicule them for holding discriminatory views based on nothing more than faith. It would be completely unreasonable any other way. They are of course free to "preach", but I am free to "preach" as well, right? In the same way that they are trying to "help" homosexuals by teaching them that God doesn't like their way of life, I am trying to "help" them by pointing out that their subjective belief about God's will is misguided.
Is some believer using their religion's moral/law to judge/comdemn/preaching to non-believer itself sometimes filling with insult?
You're evil.
You're sinner.
You're immoral.
You're abomination.
You're blind for not seeing a specific god's existence.
... etc