Soandso
ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
As I have been saying, the way scientists describe it, it is mindless. It's a bunch of chemical reactions without mindful purpose. It is supposed to do what it does mindlessly.
Just like every other force of nature
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As I have been saying, the way scientists describe it, it is mindless. It's a bunch of chemical reactions without mindful purpose. It is supposed to do what it does mindlessly.
To me it's not self delusion.because life, as I see it, and the preservation of the scriptures are miraculous."Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more; and if the final outcome of all the boasted discoveries of modern science is to disclose to men that they are more evanescent than the shadow of the swallow's wing up on the lake give... me then, I pray, no more science. Let me live on, in my simple ignorance, as my fathers lived before me, and when I shall at length be summoned to my final repose, let me still be able to fold the drapery of my couch about me, and lie down to pleasant, even if they be deceitful, dreams."
I could never choose self delusion over the persuit of truth - even if the truth I uncovered was unpleasant. Honestly, growing so attached to the ego feels unhealthy to me. We all gotta die some time - savor the moment
Once again, the theory is that the life changes via evolution are mindless. That's it.Yes. And?
There are those here who believe in evolution and also that God is somewhere maybe but are unwilling to discuss it. I guess it cuts too close for them.Just like every other force of nature
To me it's not self delusion.because life, as I see it, and the preservation of the scriptures are miraculous.
I understand what you're saying. If I thought that evolution as perceived by the majority of scientists is true beyond question, I'd have a different viewpoint. I do not see it as truth and fact beyond question. But if I live '(and that's questionable) in the near enough future, I'll get back with this.I'm not sure how you see it, but quoting the man from the article - it feels like he's coping. For example, from the very first line:
"Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more;"
What he is saying is that he loves the truth as a concept, but that truth isn't as important as the idea of immortality to him. That's delusional thinking
Yes. And then again I give him credit because he is rational and honest enough in his thinking to admit what he believes or thinks. Some here who consider themselves rational thinkers, put down others who do not agree with the theory, get huffy, sarcastic and closed (minded) when asked to detail their beliefs. At least the author you quote is honest. For that I give him credit. Not that I agree with his analysis of the theory. I do see, however, the reasons why many do believe evolution is how things came about in this world.I'm not sure how you see it, but quoting the man from the article - it feels like he's coping. For example, from the very first line:
"Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more;"
What he is saying is that he loves the truth as a concept, but that truth isn't as important as the idea of immortality to him. That's delusional thinking
Changing ideas...? Maybe.
Question For You About Evolution, God And Death
savor the moment
What is happening is that he is confronted with the exposition of the theories of evolution. But again, no proof. His hope of immortality is probably not as I understand it, but what I discern is that he hopes to live forever someday. There are two ways to back that up. 1is the Bible. The other is life itself.I'm not sure how you see it, but quoting the man from the article - it feels like he's coping. For example, from the very first line:
"Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more;"
What he is saying is that he loves the truth as a concept, but that truth isn't as important as the idea of immortality to him. That's delusional thinking
Yes. And then again I give him credit because he is rational and honest enough in his thinking to admit what he believes or thinks. Some here who consider themselves rational thinkers, put down others who do not agree with the theory, get huffy, sarcastic and closed (minded) when asked to detail their beliefs. At least the author you quote is honest. For that I give him credit. Not that I agree with his analysis of the theory. I do see, however, the reasons why many do believe evolution is how things came about in this world.
What is happening is that he is confronted with the exposition of the theories of evolution. But again, no proof.
His hope of immortality is probably not as I understand it, but what I discern is that he hopes to live forever someday. There are two ways to back that up. 1is the Bible.
The other is life itself.
I'm not sure how you see it, but quoting the man from the article - it feels like he's coping. For example, from the very first line:
"Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more;"
What he is saying is that he loves the truth as a concept, but that truth isn't as important as the idea of immortality to him. That's delusional thinking
The bold one requries evidence per burden of proof. So please give that.
That's not what I read. What happens in the article is that he chooses to ignore his beliefs in evolution in favor of what he wants - even though he finds the theory convincing. That's fine, but to do so requires serious mental gymnastics and cognitive dissonance. I wouldn't be able to live a happy life like that, personally
I did explain my thoughts in more detail further down
The quote "Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more" encapsulates this perfectly
If you have to say to yourself "This one thing is probably true, but I'm going to actively try to pretend that it's not and try to convince myself instead that this other thing is true because it's what I want it to be true" - that's delusional thinking
Yeah, that is a norm in your thinking.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Maybe you could take the time to explain your thoughts like I took the time to explain mine?
That problem is that there is no objective definitions of truth or what matters to humans, so your version depends on what you thing truth is and what matters as being a human.
I agree. I'm not saying that he is rejecting actual, objective truth. What I am saying is that he is taking something that he already accepts as probably true in favor of lying to himself. As he continues on...
"Let me live on, in my simple ignorance, as my fathers lived before me, and when I shall at length be summoned to my final repose, let me still be able to fold the drapery of my couch about me, and lie down to pleasant, even if they be deceitful, dreams."
Let me emphasize that last bit.
"and lie down to pleasant, even if they be deceitful, dreams."
He is actively trying to shelter himself from what he thinks is true in favor of what he describes as self deception. That is delusional thinking
I get it now. Thanks for sticking with me.
It is interesting, but proposes interesting questions all have to ask including youGotta read it. How interesting.