as I said to you before, the majority of biologists are only focused on today’s extant and living species of organisms.
Not as many are involved in search for fossils of some earlier extinct species. Most biologists are not paleontologists, because paleontology is a specialised field, so not every universities around the world would offer paleontology as a course.
But even fewer people are investigating Abiogenesis, which are about the hypothesis for origins of life, because it is also specialised field, requiring far more advanced knowledge of chemistry and of biochemistry.
And the thing you need reminding, is that inorganic matters and organic matters, are all chemistry.
Chemical reactions and molecular interactions are all natural occurrence & natural processes, whether it be inorganic or organic chemistry.
I know I don’t have the experiences and knowledge in chemistry to even know how to begin the research in Abiogenesis, I am quite sure you are in the same boat as me. But the differences between you and me, is that you’re allowing your religious belief to cloud and to bias your thought processes.
Like every other creationists, here and elsewhere, your arguments against either Evolution or Abiogenesis, are -
- based on superstitions of some invisible powerful entity can transform dust (or some sorts of soil) into living fully grown human male, that require some unnatural and unnecessary magic
- or based on arguments from ignorance, straw man arguments, and all sorts of
- and the overuse of irrelevant analogies or metaphors for either creationism or Intelligent Design that are not relevant to explain biological processes
And none of your arguments or from your fellow-creationists have any observable and verifiable empirical evidence to support any one’s of your arguments. Instead of finding evidence to support your arguments, you all rely on circular reasoning, confirmation biases and misinformation to base your arguments on.
What you really don’t understand about Evolution, as I have witnessed among other creationists, is that biodiversity, which may or may not cause speciation, though genetic variation and adaptation, which involve evolutionary mechanisms, such as
- mutations,
- genetic drift,
- gene flow,
- genetic hitchhiking,
- natural selection.
…each of these mechanisms, involved natural processes; there are no unnatural magic or miracles in these processes.
Evolution was never about the origin of life. It was always about how life change over time, not about “first life”.
And Evolution is just about human evolution, but about every other animals, as well as about plants, fungi, protists, archaea and bacteria. These are all living “cellular” organisms, whether it be multicellular organisms or unicellular organism, or whether it be eukaryotes or prokaryotes. Evolution deals with speciation of each these organisms.
While Abiogenesis is indeed about the origin of life, but the studies isn’t limited to origin of life, it is about the origins of biological molecules, such as proteins (which are made of biopolymer chains of amino acids), nuclei acids (eg RNA, DNA), carbohydrates, lipids, etc. Every cells of every living organisms, are made made from these four fundamental biological macromolecules.
Abiogenesis is about unlocking how these biological macromolecules form, in the first place.
There are nothing magical or supernatural about chemistry and biochemistry.
