You have to want to dialogue without bias for there to be good comunication.
When in dialogues please try and present a coherent argument with accurate references.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You have to want to dialogue without bias for there to be good comunication.
LOL... this is getting childish.When in dialogues please try and present a coherent argument with accurate references.
LOL... this is getting childish.
Take a chill pill. The logic worked for me. If you believe it doesn't, it won't.... for you.
Your digging yourself in deeper. This response is a logical fallacy:
From: True for me fallacy - Google Search
"Relativist fallacy. The relativist fallacy, also known as the subjectivist fallacy, is claiming that something is true for one person but not true for someone else. The fallacy is supposed to rest on the law of non-contradiction. ... If one commits a fallacy, one says something false or not worth serious consideration."
Hardly...
If you have a gold medal race in the olympics and one says "I will never make the top three... and I doubt I will be in the top 10" he won't make the medal.
If you have someone sayiing "I am a gold medalist" - he will make it eventually.
If you don't believe it will work for you... it won't. It is a spiritual truth.
LOL Like I said, be it unto you as you have believed.Reality
Your digging yourself in deeper. This response is a logical fallacy:
From: True for me fallacy - Google Search
"Relativist fallacy. The relativist fallacy, also known as the subjectivist fallacy, is claiming that something is true for one person but not true for someone else. The fallacy is supposed to rest on the law of non-contradiction. ... If one commits a fallacy, one says something false or not worth serious consideration."