Irony of the evolutionary belief

[TagliatelliMonster]

It's funny when you think about it...if they consider themselves apes, children of apes, they might as well be grandchildren of frogs and great-grandchildren of cockroaches...what difference does it make?

The difference is that those would require species to jump branches.

But I wouldn't expect someone who insists on willful ignorance, intellectual dishonesty and strawmanning biology to understand that.


By all means, continue to bear false witness

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

There is not any evidence for evolution of one species into another one. It's fiction to support the myth.

Phylogenetic tree - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Off course, if you are going to ignore all the evidence, then there is no evidence.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Not all "experts in science" are evolutionists. Be real.

Project Steve - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

That was it for today.
You already bored me.
Boring apes.

You think you are insulting us.
But all you are accomplishing is showing to all involved how closed minded and willfully ignorant you are.

 

[cladking]

Yes, you mention that ad nauseum and every time this error of yours is corrected, but alas..............

Did you correct it this time as well?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Do you think atheists will ever invent an ape pride?

It's like you aren't even aware the the majority of christians don't have any issues with modern biology.

 

[cladking]

Right, right.... because the only alternative to making sh!t up is gods handing down scripture from "above".

As long as we have "Science" and Peers" to answer every question nobody needs to have an idea or to invent experiment.

 

[Subduction Zone]

It's like you aren't even aware the the majority of christians don't have any issues with modern biology.

Creationists have to pretend that evolution is an atheists only idea. Facing the fact that most Christians accept it is just too much for them.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As long as we have "Science" and Peers" to answer every question nobody needs to have an idea or to invent experiment.

As long as you insist on following your long debunked claims you will not learn anything.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Let's talk "web": Did you know that the official JWs website is the most translated in the whole net?

... more than any scientific institution website, more than NASA's website, more than the Vatican's website, a lot more than any other website, simply THE MOST TRANSLATED, without adds, with security, totally free for all public ...

All paid for with the "donations" of the faithful.

So what?

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

I guess coming back was a waste of time.

Hey, you managed to get something right!

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Evolution theory is based on the existence of chimeras, mixed species, evolutionary links between different species supposedly successive and directly related ... those are chimeras: more than one animal species in one body ... There is not difference between that and a mythological chimera. You have never found any.

You are confusing evolution theory with your strawman version of it.

There no crockoducks.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Did you correct it this time as well?

No, I've completely given up on correcting you and pointing out your mistakes because it's a waste of time.

I will not take any of your posts seriously goving forward until you demonstrate that you are ready to have a rational and intellectually honest conversation.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

As long as we have "Science" and Peers" to answer every question nobody needs to have an idea or to invent experiment.

More strawmanning nonsense that is neither here nore there.
Misrepresenting science is all you have.

 

[cladking]

No, I've completely given up on correcting you and pointing out your mistakes because it's a waste of time.

The longest journey begins with a single step.

Of course the first corollary is that every journey can't exist without a first step.

 

[SkepticThinker]

A lot of two way communication is possible with babies because they are little homo sapiens who speak Ancient Language. I'm hardly adept but can communicate with them. Babies are much easier than other animals. You'd probably be surprised what they can learn at this age.

I was nanny to my sister's kids when they were babies. I can assure you, I'm aware of what babies are capable of learning.

You were the one that was just telling me that babies can't communicate. I was disagreeing with you.

"I've said many times that humans are like sleep walkers. We can't even see our own consciousness or reality itself directly. We see everything through a kaleidoscope of what we believe. We can't communicate with animals or even our own young."

You can get their attention almost from birth and they love to learn. I think they are stunted because they get no feedback they can understand.

Babies can understand plenty of feedback.

 

[cladking]

You were the one that was just telling me that babies can't communicate. I was disagreeing with you.

Remarkable!!!

"A lot of two way communication is possible with babies because they are little homo sapiens who speak Ancient Language."

 

[SkepticThinker]

Remarkable!!!

"A lot of two way communication is possible with babies because they are little homo sapiens who speak Ancient Language."

I just quoted to you what I was referring to:

I've said many times that humans are like sleep walkers. We can't even see our own consciousness or reality itself directly. We see everything through a kaleidoscope of what we believe. We can't communicate with animals or even our own young."


Good grief.

Now you've changed your mind and decided that babies are "little homo sapiens who speak Ancient Language" ... ?
Mmmkay.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

The longest journey begins with a single step.

Of course the first corollary is that every journey can't exist without a first step.

I will take the first step only so many times.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

What leads you to repeat the claim that all change in all living things is sudden when you clearly do not have the evidence to support that claim? Why do you adhere and persist in this claim when it goes against the evidence of experiment and observation.

Are the generation times of E. coli, Ephemeroptera, Homo sapiens and Pinus longaeva all sudden and the same duration?

Do all novel, beneficial genes fix in a population at the same rate? In other words, is mutation, reproduction and fixation all sudden?

Do farmers observe a corn crop suddenly after planting?

If a farmer plants a mixed crop of American ginseng, pawpaw and walnuts this coming season, should he expect to harvest from all of them in the following fall? According to your claim his equipment would be wrecked during planting as the walnut trees would burst from the ground suddenly as fully mature trees laden with nuts.

I think if you look at the evidence and think about it, you will find your claim has no merit. It seems you have just come to believe it since that fits with other things you believe, but cannot demonstrate.

No answer addressing this yet. I know I shouldn't expect it to be answered or in any meaningful way.

If by some extreme chance it was addressed and on topic, that might constitute a miracle.