So abiogenesis does not offer any idea as to WHAT might have been the first form of life, is that what you are saying? I remember you didn't like a dictionary definition of abiogenesis, so how about the following, do you want to refute it also by saying oh, they don't know what they're talking about maybe?
wikipedia under abiogenesis
"
biology,
abiogenesis (from
Greek ἀ-
a- 'not' + βῐ́ος
bios 'life' + γένεσις
genesis 'origin') or the
origin of life is the
natural process by which
life has arisen from non-living matter, such as simple
organic compounds. The prevailing scientific hypothesis is that the transition from non-living to living entities on Earth was not a single event, but a process of
increasing complexity involving the formation of a habitable planet, the prebiotic synthesis of organic molecules, molecular self-replication, self-assembly, autocatalysis, and the emergence of cell membranes. Many proposals have been made for different stages of the process, but the transition from non-life to life has never been observed experimentally."
Remember it says natural process. The Bible does not say "natural process." But yes, that God caused life to be on the earth.
My comment -- uh - yeah...and like to walk out of class if I could because there ain't gonna be any answers except um, we don't know now -- maybe later. Maybe you think wikipedia is wrong when they say the transition from non-life to life has -- never been observed experimentally. About the Urey-Miller experiment, it also says: "The classic 1952
Miller–Urey experiment demonstrated that most amino acids, the chemical constituents of
proteins, can be synthesized from
inorganic compounds under conditions intended to replicate those of the
early Earth. External sources of energy may have triggered these reactions, including
lightning,
radiation, atmospheric entries of micro-meteorites and implosion of bubbles in sea and ocean waves. Other approaches (
"metabolism-first" hypotheses) focus on understanding how
catalysis in chemical systems on the early Earth might have provided the
precursor molecules necessary for self-replication."
But they don't KNOW that.
So again, even the Urey-Miller experiments are contrived and not demonstrating in reality how life got started on the earth. Maybe you have more information.
