• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is 83 years old too old to be a father?

How old is 'too old' to have children?

  • Over 30

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 40

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Over 50

    Votes: 9 45.0%
  • Over 60

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • Over 70

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 80

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't know/No opinion

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 4 20.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
it's biology that tells when someone can't be a mother any more and when someone can't be a father any more.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
These studies consider "older fathers" to be in the general vicinity of 45 years old - about half the age of Pacino or DeNiro.

It's one of those things where just because technically you can still do something that doesn't necessarily mean you should do it.

Yeah, I'm trying to fathom what the reason is, maybe to prove they're still manly at an advanced age?
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Well...that would debunk the myth of gay parenthood...
I mean...shall a gay parent become a biological father just because he can produce sperms?

How and why have you brought "gay" into this.

To answer your question... If a guy man can impregnate a woman, yes he can become a biological father.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I have no particular opinion on this, given that I think the relationship with one's mother is more important and probably has the greatest effect if such are missing. All the rest seems more about wants - the male parent and role models and such. Given that a child is likely to be healthier if fathered by a healthy father than some old git - like me. o_O
 
Last edited:

exchemist

Veteran Member







My view is, to each their own.

What do you think about men becoming fathers at such a late age? It seems women have also been having children at later ages, too. The article mentioned Naomi Campbell having a child at age 50.

Some might argue that it does a disservice to the child, since the older parent will die while their child is still at an early age. On the other hand, with Al Pacino and Robert Deniro, they seem well off enough that they'll probably leave enough money for the kid to go to college and get set up in life - which many younger parents are simply unable to do.

What do you think?
People live longer now and in many cases stay fitter much later than in previous eras. I see no reason why a fit man in his 50s can't bring up a child. I became a father at 47 and my wife died when my son was 13, leaving me to bring him up. He's now 20, and I think I'm good for another decade or so, with luck. I tell myself so long as I can remain active, engaged and compos mentis until he is 25, then I will have done my duty as a father.

But admittedly there is only the one. If there were 3 or 4 one would need a great deal more energy, but then one would hope there would be 2 parents to share the load. But I think fathering children when one is over 60 is a bit unfair. Losing a parent before one is adult is bound to be traumatic and there is always some risk of the Grim Reaper showing up a bit early.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
This is America, where the rich and famous can do anything they want. And the rest of you losers can wash their socks or shut up and die.
 
Top