• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is 83 years old too old to be a father?

How old is 'too old' to have children?

  • Over 30

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 40

    Votes: 1 5.0%
  • Over 50

    Votes: 9 45.0%
  • Over 60

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • Over 70

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Over 80

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't know/No opinion

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 4 20.0%

  • Total voters
    20

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
I find abhorrent that a woman gets paid for giving away her own baby.
Conceived with an artificial insemination. The baby contains the 50% of her genetic heritage.

For instance, in my country maternal surrogacy is forbidden. Even if done for free. If gay couples or straight couples want a baby, they can adopt one.

Once upon a time, the ancient Romans were all in on surrogacy, ventrem locare.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member







My view is, to each their own.

What do you think about men becoming fathers at such a late age? It seems women have also been having children at later ages, too. The article mentioned Naomi Campbell having a child at age 50.

Some might argue that it does a disservice to the child, since the older parent will die while their child is still at an early age. On the other hand, with Al Pacino and Robert Deniro, they seem well off enough that they'll probably leave enough money for the kid to go to college and get set up in life - which many younger parents are simply unable to do.

What do you think?

The only thing the human race needs to survive is to procreate.
How we get to that point doesn't matter much I suppose.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
IMO... Being a dad is taking your kid hiking, fishing, to car shows/drag races, playing ball with them, teaching them skills, taking them on adventures they enjoy, going to their school functions, going to their graduation, etc etc. If you're too old to do that,,, well money can't replace those quality times.
I think there's a fair bit of truth to that.
Being a dad is definitely more than 'creating a baby', and you shouldn't be trying to do one without signing up for the other.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
So there are women who rent their womanhood and maternity...I got it.
I've made this point to you before, but surrogacy and paid surrogacy are not one and the same.
Surrogacy is allowed in Australia but paid surrogacy is not.

When my sister was having trouble getting pregnant, my wife was considering offering to act as a surrogate. In no way is that 'renting their womanhood' but is rather a sacrifice for family.

You're broad brushing here.
 

Sand Dancer

Currently catless
One is too old to be a father when one is too old to produce fertile sperm and/or too old to effectively transfer those sperm to a recipient or lacks the desire or will to transfer them.
The thing is that we are living far longer than we ever have, and men continue to produce sperm, whereas women are born with the eggs they will ever have. An octogenarian is not going to be there for his children and will likely die before they reach adulthood. That is not very smart, IMO.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
One is too old to be a father when one is too old to produce fertile sperm and/or too old to effectively transfer those sperm to a recipient or lacks the desire or will to transfer them.
I say that one is too old to become a father when chances are skyrocketting that one won't even see your kid's 14th birthday due to dieing of old age.
Fatherhood is more then just depositing a sperm cell.

But that's just my opinion. I wouldn't support a law that says an 83 year old "can't have children".
Me though, I'ld never do that. I think it's irresponsible. You doom your child, knowingly, to growing up with a father.

In fact, chances are IMMENSE that your child will lose his father at an extremely difficult age (from 5 to 12).
Younger and they don't remember.
Older and they are mature enough to put it in perspective.
Between 5 and 12 is just a horrible age to lose a parent.

That's why I think it's irresponsible.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
IMO... Being a dad is taking your kid hiking, fishing, to car shows/drag races, playing ball with them, teaching them skills, taking them on adventures they enjoy, going to their school functions, going to their graduation, etc etc. If you're too old to do that,,, well money can't replace those quality times.
Totally agree.

I would say, though, that my time is more flexible now than it was when I was younger in terms of work life balance.

I spend a lot of time coaching my elder two daughters in basketball, etc. Whereas when younger I had to travel a lot for work, as I 'made my way up'.

I'm older, but still play ball myself. Older doesn't need to mean sedintary.
 
Top