lets get to the core so you guys know what your talking about.
based possibly on a stolen religion theres this dead jesus cat, people start telling storys about him for a good 10 years before these storys get written down in eschatological material and son of man material, maybe 10-15 ish years after the cat is smoked, written down by a unknown author known as Q, theres a thomas tale attached to this that pops up 25 ish years later. 5 years ish pass since Qs original work and Q's work gets a little more work done known as late strada codified Q. NOW the earliest work of unknown author called mark start showing up on the scene a good 37 years after historical jesus was smoked. later on luke copies a little Q and a little mark. Mat copies a little Q which later turns out in a augmented mark in the second century. Throw in a little sercet mark and carporcration mark and WE FINALY GET canonical mark in which the NT is based
Historicaly speaking you have very little to work from or work with.
Calling the NT a myth is not a stretch by any means. you had oral trasmission for a decade ish before anything was written down, the tales were told and told again by many people. OF the MANY only 1 or 2 wrote anything down so your dealing with someones interpitation that you base your whole beliefs from.
Thats fact brothers