Is Atheism based on superstition?

[paarsurrey]

paarsurrey said: ↑
Atheism has neither basis in Revelation nor in science.
Right? Please
Regards

How did you come to that conclusion?

Atheism have never claimed that it is based on Revelation.
Which mention the discipline of science that supports and proved "no-god" concept of Atheism. There is no such discipline of science. Right? Please
Regards

 

[JustWondering]

I considered joining this debate but I think paarsurrey is a troll or is incapable of thinking logically. If paarsurrey thinks that believing in Zeus is not a superstitious belief but simply saying "I don't see any evidence to support the existence of gods" is superstitious, then rational discussion with him is impossible.

 

[paarsurrey]

I considered joining this debate but I think paarsurrey is a troll or is incapable of thinking logically. If paarsurrey thinks that believing in Zeus is not a superstitious belief but simply saying "I don't see any evidence to support the existence of gods" is superstitious, then rational discussion with him is impossible.

Does one believe in Zeus? Please
Name of G-d is not much important in the Truthful Religion, it is the attributes of G-d that matter. Every people in any part of the world may have a different name in their own language. If the attributes of Zeus match with the attributes of Allah, name of G-d in Arabic, then I will believe in Zeus. Nobody has yet mentioned the attributes of Zeus, I have asked many people.
Please
Regards

 

[paarsurrey]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

Neither science nor revelation supports Atheism. It must be superstition to take one to Atheism?
Regards

 

[psychoslice]

I can't even believe the question from the OP, oxymoron all over lol.

 

[McBell]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

I suppose for some atheists it is just as much superstition as theism.
Though there is a subset of atheism that the word does not apply to.
Sadly, most theists on this forum are unable or unwilling to understand this little fact.
Sad really.

Neither science nor revelation supports Atheism. It must be superstition to take one to Atheism?
Regards

Not much meaning in your use of words you have demonstrated no understanding of.

 

[Revoltingest]

I can't even believe the question from the OP, oxymoron all over lol.

Aye, it has become "superstition" to not believe in fairies, elves, demons, genies, angels & gods.
For my next trick, I'll claim that up is down, black is white, & right is wrong.

 

[paarsurrey]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

If not, on what knowledge?
Please name it.
Regards

 

[McBell]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

no

If not, on what knowledge?
Please name it.

the knowledge that the theist is unable to convince them god exists.

 

[paarsurrey]

the knowledge that the theist is unable to convince them god exists.

Why should a believer convince somebody , unnecessarily?
Regards

 

[ArtieE]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

Neither science nor revelation supports Atheism. It must be superstition to take one to Atheism?
Regards

You don't believe in the existence of all gods except one yourself. What took you to not believing in the existence of 99.99 percent of all gods? Superstition?

 

[ArtieE]

Is Atheism based on superstition?

If not, on what knowledge?
Please name it.
Regards

Please name the knowledge you have that makes you believe 99.99 percent of all gods don't exist.

 

[paarsurrey]

You don't believe in the existence of all gods except one yourself. What took you to not believing in the existence of 99.99 percent of all gods? Superstition?

I will compare the attributes of G-d with other believer who believes in different god, and see his justifications for such belief.
Regards

 

[McBell]

Why should a believer convince somebody , unnecessarily?
Regards

The believer is making the claim.
There is no reason to believe as the believer does without being convinced the believers beliefs are believable.
You, as a believer, have not convinced non believers your beliefs are believable.

 

[McBell]

I will compare the attributes of G-d with other believer who believes in different god, and see his justifications for such belief.
Regards

please show your work

 

[SkepticX]

I encourage those who are genuinely confused about atheism to warm up to the Not Collecting Stamps litmus. It should clarify the source of the confusion. If you're determined to be confused by atheism (perhaps to pretend it's absurd beyond comprehension), then you probably shouldn't use this litmus--could cause problems for maintaining the pretense--probably not, but why risk it?

For some examples:
What is [not collecting stamps] based upon?
Is [not collecting stamps] based upon superstition?
Neither science or revelation support [not collecting stamps].

 

[psychoslice]

Superstition is from false beliefs, most of what atheists belief is proven by science, so there you are, prove your beliefs and get on the atheist wagon, yea yea baby.

 

[paarsurrey]

Superstition is from false beliefs, most of what atheists belief is proven by science, so there you are, prove your beliefs and get on the atheist wagon, yea yea baby.

"Superstition is from false beliefs"

And the main identity of Atheism's "no-god" position/non-position is a false identity or belief/no-belief and is not supported by science. Is it? Please
So one confirms that Atheism is superstition but pretends to hide behind science so that it looks like it is science or a branch of it. Right? Please
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Regards

 

[psychoslice]

"Superstition is from false beliefs"

And the main identity of Atheism's "no-god" position/non-position is a false identity or belief/no-belief and is not supported by science. Is it? Please
So one confirms that Atheism is superstition but pretends to hide behind science so that it looks like it is science or a branch of it. Right? Please
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Regards

Listen, your the only one here hiding from whatever you believe in, how dare you say that about science when your illusion is far behind science, you are so arrogant, except you just can't see it, get off you high horse and learn something that makes sense for Christ sake !!.

 

[ArtieE]

"Superstition is from false beliefs"

And the main identity of Atheism's "no-god" position/non-position is a false identity or belief/no-belief and is not supported by science. Is it? Please
So one confirms that Atheism is superstition but pretends to hide behind science so that it looks like it is science or a branch of it. Right? Please
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Regards

There's no scientific evidence for the existence of gods so atheists don't believe in gods. Can you understand such a simple sentence?