Martin
Spam, wonderful spam (bloody vikings!)
It doesn't sound like this character has anything to with Buddhism, so I don't understand why he would be seen as a reliable source of information about Buddhism.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No
Yes, it does matter if one is genuinely interested in understanding the teachings of a tradition, rather than just seeing it through the lens of another.
For example, "Divine perspective" sounds incongruous in a Buddhist context.
Buddha is the ninth avatar of Lord Vishnu.Avatar? According to who?
No. Or if he was, he died about 2,400 years ago.Is Buddha God?
Buddha is the ninth avatar of Lord Vishnu.
You are correct about thisThe question is a tricky one at several levels. First, there are various schools of thought as to his status ─ in all of them he's enlightened, in some of them he's enlightened and divine.
Second, in some versions, like Tibetan Buddhism, he's Boss God, and there's a day each year where a great pageant reenacts ─ or used to reenact ─ the old Tibetan gods acknowledging him as their overlord.
Third, when I was in Sri Lanka, I visited the Temple of the Buddha's Tooth at Kandi, and was astonished to find associated in the same precinct small shrines with houses of worship to various Hindu gods whom the worshiper consults for special needs like healing, childbirth, and so on, as though the Buddha were one end of the Hindu spectrum.
Fourth, in the West, the most popular versions of Buddhism are (according to my Buddhist friend) the atheistic ones, and these too have authentic Asian credentials.
So Buddhism is a big tent.
No.Is Buddha God?
Buddism is not non-theistic. Buddism is agnostic about if a creator God exist. Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not.No.
When asked about God, his supposed answer was that the question was irrelevant. Later, his followers tried to clarify why they thought Old Sid said this, and it generally is that we should live in the here & now, not the past.
Thus, Buddhism is considered to be non-theistic, which is no belief in a creator-God.
I qualified "non-theistic" as having no belief in a "creator god", so "agnostic" obviously applies.Buddism is not non-theistic. Buddism is agnostic about if a creator God exist. Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not.
And there are many different gods in buddism (gods who is not the creator).
Buddism is not non-theistic. Buddism is agnostic about if a creator God exist. Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not.
And there are many different gods in buddism (gods who is not the creator).
So many buddists believe in a creator God and many buddists do not believe in a creator God. There are both theistic, agnostic and atheists buddists
Buddism is not non-theistic. Buddism is agnostic about if a creator God exist. Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not.
And there are many different gods in buddism (gods who is not the creator).
So many buddists believe in a creator God and many buddists do not believe in a creator God. There are both theistic, agnostic and atheists buddists
Considering you are a non-Buddhist, you have a good handle on Old Sid.No.
When asked about God, his supposed answer was that the question was irrelevant. Later, his followers tried to clarify why they thought Old Sid said this, and it generally is that we should live in the here & now, not the past.
Thus, Buddhism is considered to be non-theistic, which is no belief in a creator-God.
many buddists believe in a creator God
Thank you.Considering you are a non-Buddhist, you have a good handle on Old Sid.
Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not. So off course it is possible to be a Agnostic, Theist or Atheist buddistNews to me. One reason for the appeal to me of Buddhism was the absence of a creator deity.
These Buddhists that believe in a creator deity....what is the name of it?Buddha was agnostic about if a creator God exist or not. So off course it is possible to be a Agnostic, Theist or Atheist buddist
Haha, your memory is as bad as mine! - You contributed to my journal thread about him and another book of his: "The Monk and the Philosopher: A Father and Son Discuss the Meaning of Life"Thank you.
BTW, I am now part way through Matthieu Ricards book on "Happiness" as he's my favorite author. Are you familiar with him by chance?