gsa
Well-Known Member
According to an article that I read recently, yes. Although the hadith collection that documents Aisha's age at consummation being 9 is regarded as authentic by most Sunnis, the article casts doubt on its authenticity:
In addition, some modern Muslim scholars have more recently cast doubt on the veracity of the saying, or hadith, used to assert Aisha’s young age. In Islam, the hadith literature (sayings of the prophet) is considered secondary to the Qur’an. While the Qur’an is considered to be the verbatim word of God, the hadiths were transmitted over time through a rigorous but not infallible methodology. Taking all known accounts and records of Aisha’s age at marriage, estimates of her age range from nine to 19.
Because of this, it is impossible to know with any certainty how old Aisha was. What we do know is what the Qur’an says about marriage: that it is valid only between consenting adults, and that a woman has the right to choose her own spouse. As the living embodiment of Islam, Muhammad’s actions reflect the Qur’an’s teachings on marriage, even if the actions of some Muslim regimes and individuals do not.
Yet Muslim apologists do not seem to be taken with this view, instead focusing on historic age of consent to marriage. Presumably, because rejecting the hadith collections represents a problem as well.
The problem is that there is no good way of dealing with Aisha. The age of consummation is taken from a hadith, not the Quran, but there are few Quranist (Quran only) Muslims.
The other problem, of course, is that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha at 6 and having sex with her at 9 doesn’t necessarily demonstrate pedophilia. After all, pedophiles are persistently attracted to prepubescent children, and Aisha remained married to the prophet of Islam for the duration, and he married women who were older as well (including one that was his senior in age).
Still, a grown man having sex with a 9 year old would seem to be a problem, particularly if the grown man that had sex with the 9 year old is the perfect role model for billions of Muslims the world over. So is pointing this out as a problem "Islamophobic," or is it a fair criticism?
In addition, some modern Muslim scholars have more recently cast doubt on the veracity of the saying, or hadith, used to assert Aisha’s young age. In Islam, the hadith literature (sayings of the prophet) is considered secondary to the Qur’an. While the Qur’an is considered to be the verbatim word of God, the hadiths were transmitted over time through a rigorous but not infallible methodology. Taking all known accounts and records of Aisha’s age at marriage, estimates of her age range from nine to 19.
Because of this, it is impossible to know with any certainty how old Aisha was. What we do know is what the Qur’an says about marriage: that it is valid only between consenting adults, and that a woman has the right to choose her own spouse. As the living embodiment of Islam, Muhammad’s actions reflect the Qur’an’s teachings on marriage, even if the actions of some Muslim regimes and individuals do not.
Yet Muslim apologists do not seem to be taken with this view, instead focusing on historic age of consent to marriage. Presumably, because rejecting the hadith collections represents a problem as well.
The problem is that there is no good way of dealing with Aisha. The age of consummation is taken from a hadith, not the Quran, but there are few Quranist (Quran only) Muslims.
The other problem, of course, is that Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha at 6 and having sex with her at 9 doesn’t necessarily demonstrate pedophilia. After all, pedophiles are persistently attracted to prepubescent children, and Aisha remained married to the prophet of Islam for the duration, and he married women who were older as well (including one that was his senior in age).
Still, a grown man having sex with a 9 year old would seem to be a problem, particularly if the grown man that had sex with the 9 year old is the perfect role model for billions of Muslims the world over. So is pointing this out as a problem "Islamophobic," or is it a fair criticism?