I've been told that many seek community as a part of their beliefs or faith (or even lack thereof).
Why is community necessary for one's personal beliefs? Is it because humans tend to be social creatures and feel the need to have other believe as they do? Is it because those that do need others to corroborate their beliefs? Is it something else?
I ask because my worldview requires no community. It is based on my own personal experiences and does not require another to have a worldview similar to mine. While it's interesting to see others that have had similar experiences, knowledge of their worldview isn't integral to support mine. Even having been raised in a community based religion, I never saw the need for community to support belief.
Help me to understand why this is needed in some belief structures.
You don't really need anyone to support your beliefs. You can believe you are a god or the reason this planet exists and no one needs to agree with you to hold your beliefs. You can believe in anything. (Isn't this a popular trope historically?)
If you want to know what actually is happening though you will need other people. Even the greatest people ever born stood on the backs of others. (And they almost all openly admit it.)
Nothing is needed really for belief. You can be a Mormon, Scientologist, Catholic, Muslim or whatever you want to be based on belief. Now that I consider that though it might be an opposite argument you are addressing. You almost need other people to share your fiction to believe in it but you are questioning can't I have my own fiction that no one else believes and no community and still believe it. Absolutely. If you are gifted with speech and luck you might even inspire others to believe your version of reality.
I still prefer something a bit more rigorous but to each their own. God Speed!