Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well explain why in physical test women don't have to do the same push ups as men and the time allotted on mile runs is longer than men. That sure isn't equality to me. In fact it ought to be an insult to female candidates
I prefer a different approach: instead of making gender a requirement for the job based on some notion of the different capabilities of men and women, just set the job requirements based on the actual needs of the job, and let the gender divide sort itself out all on its own.My daughter is in the Air Force. She brings a talent set to her position which is a definite asset to our military. Consequently, she is promoted ahead of her peers - men and women alike.
Men and women bring different assets and talents to our armed forces, our police force, etc. I see no problem with allowing a different physical/fitness test for women and men. After all - they ARE different physically. Why should they be treated exactly the same?
Women are still barred from most infantry positions. This makes perfect sense to me. Infantry positions are extremely physical and often require significant upper body strength, which the vast majority of women lack when compared to men.
But is that really true?
Do everyone have the same value?
In what situations and in relation to whom?
I prefer a different approach: instead of making gender a requirement for the job based on some notion of the different capabilities of men and women, just set the job requirements based on the actual needs of the job, and let the gender divide sort itself out all on its own.
For example, if doing ___ pushups is reflective of the actual need for upper body strength in the infantry, then make this the requirement. If they're right and it really is too much for women, then no women will end up in the infantry... without ever putting in a requirement that explicitly says "no women need apply", only criteria that were directly related to the job.
Basically, if we're saying that gender is a proxy qualification that implies certain relevant skills and abilities, as long as we can test those skills and abilities directly, there's no need to use gender as a proxy this way.
My daughter is in the Air Force. She brings a talent set to her position which is a definite asset to our military. Consequently, she is promoted ahead of her peers - men and women alike.
Men and women bring different assets and talents to our armed forces, our police force, etc. I see no problem with allowing a different physical/fitness test for women and men. After all - they ARE different physically. Why should they be treated exactly the same?
Women are still barred from most infantry positions. This makes perfect sense to me. Infantry positions are extremely physical and often require significant upper body strength, which the vast majority of women lack when compared to men.
Now - if there were differences in the MENTAL tests, that would be another matter. But that's not the case.
I still think the standards ought to be evened out because it isn't equality. If men did 11 push-ups instead of 21 (which is the standard for men) he is disqualified. Women are physically different yes, but I don't think physical differences ought to be the standard as far as a candidate's capabilities.
21 push-ups seems like a ridiculously low requirement for any physically demanding job, for men or women.
Is equality everyone being treated the same? Is it even possible to treat everyone the same? Is being treated the same as being fair or not? Do we all have to receive the same things as everyone else in order for everything to be "fair"?
Discuss, please (if you want) (remember that it is a discussion and not a debate, I am interested in everyone's pov.)
Agreed.
When I was in the military I could do about ten times that number... :sarcastic
yesIs equality everyone being treated the same?
i think soIs it even possible to treat everyone the same?
fairIs being treated the same as being fair or not?
what things are you referring to...Do we all have to receive the same things as everyone else in order for everything to be "fair"?
Well, 21 push ups is higher than the Canadian minimum standard.
Canadian Forces physical fitness standards
Just sayin'.
I used to do 4 sets of alternating 20 push-ups and 30 curl-ups every morning just to wake myself up.