Trailblazer
Veteran Member
What is that 'belief' based upon?I would say, if we consider the average living being with a nervous system that lives, or lived, that God, assuming He exists, is definitely evil.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What is that 'belief' based upon?I would say, if we consider the average living being with a nervous system that lives, or lived, that God, assuming He exists, is definitely evil.
or why would a Good God allow evil to exist.... there are answers. God does not cause any evil but God allows free will and tat is why there is evil in the world because humans cause evil by the free will decisions that they make to disobey the Law of God....I am aware that would immediately raise the problem of Good. Ergo, why an evil God would allow some instances of Good, but I am sure that there are answers to that, too.
Why would the deity be culpable for people who have a big ego?If my ego were a barrier to my seeing any deity existed, then any deity that created me would be culpable for that, obviously.
If God is good and God is loving what is the evidence? This is all about evidence. I don’t want to see any scriptures because they are not evidence.
Look around you in this world. What evidence do you see that would indicate that a good/loving God exists? I am trying to be objective about this rather than being influenced by my own feelings and life experiences which do not constitute evidence.
Why do you think that love can only be a physical process?I doubt God can experience love.
We human's experience love because we humans are physical beings.
Love is a physical process.
If God is not physical then I don't see how it would be possible for God to feel love.
Why do you think that love can only be a physical process?
Seeing the human consciousness life lives expresses within the heavens we means brothers as the men agreement rationally.No. In the referred post, I mean all things in the universe, living and non-living, without any exception, including a dead body, when I said 'we'. That is the standard Advaita non-dual Hinduism statement.
Yes, what constitutes me started 13.78 billion years ago (the molecules) and will last till the end of universe.
All that is true, but that does not mean that the brain is the only way to feel love. Of course this is a faith-based belief, but Baha'is believe that God has a Mind, although it is unlike the mind of humans.Because our feelings, emotions especially is a biological process.
The inability to experience emotions is the result of a physical brain disorder.
Alexithymia - Wikipedia
If we could feel love without a brain then nobody would not be able to feel it.
Are these teachings anything new? Advaita also does not recognize any kind of differentiation. It does not recognize even the differentiation between humans and animals. It does not even recognize any differentiation between the living and non-living. Caste system is a social malady. It has nothing to do with Hindu religion. It is present even in other religions of India including Islam, Sikhism and Christianity. These are the major religions of India. The other religions are demographically insignificant, Bahais being one of them. As you say, the problem is with implementation of teachings. Why blame religions?The proof is in our ability to implement those teachings in our own lives.
I watched a lot of Untold Stories the last few weeks, a lot are on India and the issues faced by many. One of the greatest proofs of Baha’u’llah to me is the ability to change hearts away from the Caste System and allow a global vision free of predudices.
Then there are the polluted rivers and towns because of mining. There is a lot the Message of Baha’u’llah could do in India, you should look up the Baha'i and see what they are tying to do about these issues.
I consider a real plus and a minus for the Abrahamic religions.Advaita also does not recognize any kind of differentiation. It does not recognize even the differentiation between humans and animals.
Strawberries….
Chocolate…..
The smell of Roses….
Cooking with cinnamon….
Majestic mountain ranges….
Awesome waterfalls….
My son’s and wife’s laughter…
Elvis Presley’s singing….
The French horn…
All of this would be worthless, if we had not been given the senses and the conscious ability to appreciate them.
Our senses, and ability of awareness, are not necessary for life.
Yes, I follow your reasoning. You’re right, about survival. I wasn’t thinking about that, my bad.I would somewhat disagree on senses. Being able to see, hear, smell, etc its how many survive longer than they would without them.
The ego leads to selfishness and by definition is self inflation. Religion, including the Baha'i Faith calls the person to sacrifice which is contrary to selfishness. Self inflation is tantamount to replacing God with yourself. Ego needs to be reduced to recognize the Messenger, and there is no greater proof of God than the Messenger:I do not agree that it is is the ego of atheists that prevents them from seeing the glory of God although it might be their ego that prevents them from even looking at the evidence.
You and they do not want it, but you and they are ignorant of what life is like in the next world, as am I. But I am assured from the Writings, which you want to ignore in this thread, that hat life is much better than this one. I dare say it is better for atheists, too, in my opinion.What makes you think I want an infinite life? What makes you think anyone except believers want one? Most atheists tell me that living forever would be the worst kind of hell. I cannot say I disagree with them.
That is a pretty accurate depiction of how I feel and why I feel that way and I think it applies to those atheists too, but at least I know something about the next life even if I don't understand it!I understand why you don't want it, you are anxious about something you can't understand. You understand this world, bad as it is.
Bahaollah did not ever say anything new. Actually, it seems that Allah really did not even have a new message for humanity. Evidence does not mean the rants of an uneducated person. Do not say receptive hearts, say gullible hearts who believe in existence of a sky-daddy and think that the only way God can communicate with humanity is through a messenger. You are, in fact, limiting the prowess of your own God and making him sound silly.What Baha'u'llah has offered becomes the highest standard we can aspire to in this age.
Baha'u'llah said this is a great objective evidence, though is is easier to see it in hindsight, than it is to see the potential.
.. receptive hearts .. etc etc.
That is why the holy books say God gives a new heaven and a new earth and makes all things new.
Every word they utter from God is the creative force of our potential. This would be a big explanation, I will put one smaller quote under a spoiler.
Whereas I believe that all the above is true I do not see the problem with wanting objective evidence that shows that God is good and loving, if we are being told that is true.
Strawberries had to be tasty to make other life interested in them, eat them, and then spread the seeds; otherwise strawberries would not have existed. Biology was perhaps not your strong subject in school.Strawberries didn't have to be tasty…