Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
All that you need to do is to acknowledge your error and we can move on.Great, go talk with someone else that’s like minded as you and see you at the end.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
All that you need to do is to acknowledge your error and we can move on.Great, go talk with someone else that’s like minded as you and see you at the end.
The claim is I’m free, have Eternal Life, Jesus is Alive, He visited me and delivered me. The proof is I’m still free 30 years later and you can’t refute that only give your false opinion on what happened in someone else’s life.And your claim was refuted. Guess what happens when a person makes an error and refuses to own up to it? Others will keep reminding him of that error.
The claim is I’m free, have Eternal Life, Jesus is Alive, He visited me and delivered me. The proof is I’m still free 30 years later and you can’t refute that only give your false opinion on what happened in someone else’s life.
Whoosh!!!
Nope, I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty. Don't accuse others of your flaws. I chose rather well and it is very clear from the reaction. And as usual the point went over your head. Therefore the whooosh!Yes whoosh! You could have chosen to use any millions of other words but you chose to use a gross, disgusting, nasty sex act word which was by your own personal choice. That alone says a lot.
Nope, I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty. Don't accuse others of your flaws. I chose rather well and it is very clear from the reaction. And as usual the point went over your head. Therefore the whooosh!
Such projection. Just because you may act that way does not mean that others do the same."I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty".
Of course you didn't and I never accused you of saying it was(learn to read). However you went out of your way and posted the word and in my opinion you had prior knowledge of it. Who knows it may excite you and you may have partaken in such acts.
To each his own.
Whoosh!!Such projection. Just because you may act that way does not mean that others do the same.
LOL!!! It only works if you actually made a point in the first place.Whoosh!!
Why was he picking up sticks on the Sabbath? You probably can’t figure that out and don’t know why. Why were the disciples picking grain on the Sabbath?Do you not realize how silly your claim is? You just claimed that God was "in their midst". God is supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent. That would mean that he would also be omnipresent. There is no time that one is away from God.
Now the point is that the man broke a very small and pointless rule and God killed him for it. In other words, God is an immoral killer. You had to walk your claim back a bit. Why did you not just admit that you were wrong, again?
By the way, the verses that I linked earlier from Luke indicates that Jesus would not have agreed to this action. There is no difference from him harvesting some grain to eat on the Sabbath and the man gathering sticks on the Sabbath. Ooopsy.
It really does not matter. It is a clear excess. Trying to make up an excuse for your version of God's evil behavior cannot be justified with a "what if".Why was he picking up sticks on the Sabbath? You probably can’t figure that out and don’t know why. Why were the disciples picking grain on the Sabbath?
You said they were the same, now you don’t knowIt really does not matter. It is a clear excess. Trying to make up an excuse for your version of God's evil behavior cannot be justified with a "what if".
Must be a Whoosh moment for youYou said they were the same, now you don’t know
No, I said the supposed wrong was the same.You said they were the same, now you don’t know
Oh the irony! Talking to himself he finally got one right.Must be a Whoosh moment for you
How were they the same thing if you don’t know why? They weren’t the same act either and seen as you don’t know the motive, you can’t make a proper judgement.No, I said the supposed wrong was the same.
Backwards as usual, but what else was I to expect. The supposed sin was the same. It never merits a death penalty.How were they the same thing if you don’t know why? They weren’t the same act either and seen as you don’t know the motive, you can’t make a proper judgement.
You’re making a judgement and you don’t know why? Just admit you don’t know why and that you were wrong and we can move on.Backwards as usual, but what else was I to expect. The supposed sin was the same. It never merits a death penalty.
By your odd reasoning here you would be perfectly justified to cut off your child's hand for touching a hot stove after you told him not to.
No, I know why. You really need to pay attention.You’re making a judgement and you don’t know why? Just admit you don’t know why and that you were wrong and we can move on.
You have no idea why the guy was picking up sticks, if so why? Why were the disciples picking the grain?No, I know why. You really need to pay attention.