• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is God pro-abortion?

And your claim was refuted. Guess what happens when a person makes an error and refuses to own up to it? Others will keep reminding him of that error.
The claim is I’m free, have Eternal Life, Jesus is Alive, He visited me and delivered me. The proof is I’m still free 30 years later and you can’t refute that only give your false opinion on what happened in someone else’s life.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The claim is I’m free, have Eternal Life, Jesus is Alive, He visited me and delivered me. The proof is I’m still free 30 years later and you can’t refute that only give your false opinion on what happened in someone else’s life.


Sorry, but that is not "proof" that is only confirmation bias at best. When you post nothing there is no need to refute it.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Yes whoosh! You could have chosen to use any millions of other words but you chose to use a gross, disgusting, nasty sex act word which was by your own personal choice. That alone says a lot.
Nope, I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty. Don't accuse others of your flaws. I chose rather well and it is very clear from the reaction. And as usual the point went over your head. Therefore the whooosh!
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Nope, I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty. Don't accuse others of your flaws. I chose rather well and it is very clear from the reaction. And as usual the point went over your head. Therefore the whooosh!

"I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty".
Of course you didn't and I never accused you of saying it was(learn to read). However you went out of your way and posted the word and in my opinion you had prior knowledge of it. Who knows it may excite you and you may have partaken in such acts.
To each his own.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"I never claimed it to be gross, disgusting, or nasty".
Of course you didn't and I never accused you of saying it was(learn to read). However you went out of your way and posted the word and in my opinion you had prior knowledge of it. Who knows it may excite you and you may have partaken in such acts.
To each his own.
Such projection. Just because you may act that way does not mean that others do the same.
 
Do you not realize how silly your claim is? You just claimed that God was "in their midst". God is supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent. That would mean that he would also be omnipresent. There is no time that one is away from God.

Now the point is that the man broke a very small and pointless rule and God killed him for it. In other words, God is an immoral killer. You had to walk your claim back a bit. Why did you not just admit that you were wrong, again?

By the way, the verses that I linked earlier from Luke indicates that Jesus would not have agreed to this action. There is no difference from him harvesting some grain to eat on the Sabbath and the man gathering sticks on the Sabbath. Ooopsy.
Why was he picking up sticks on the Sabbath? You probably can’t figure that out and don’t know why. Why were the disciples picking grain on the Sabbath?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Why was he picking up sticks on the Sabbath? You probably can’t figure that out and don’t know why. Why were the disciples picking grain on the Sabbath?
It really does not matter. It is a clear excess. Trying to make up an excuse for your version of God's evil behavior cannot be justified with a "what if".
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
How were they the same thing if you don’t know why? They weren’t the same act either and seen as you don’t know the motive, you can’t make a proper judgement.
Backwards as usual, but what else was I to expect. The supposed sin was the same. It never merits a death penalty.

By your odd reasoning here you would be perfectly justified to cut off your child's hand for touching a hot stove after you told him not to.
 
Backwards as usual, but what else was I to expect. The supposed sin was the same. It never merits a death penalty.

By your odd reasoning here you would be perfectly justified to cut off your child's hand for touching a hot stove after you told him not to.
You’re making a judgement and you don’t know why? Just admit you don’t know why and that you were wrong and we can move on.
 
Top