• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is God Supernatural?

idav

Being
Premium Member
But all of them are speculative.
For the natural sort of theology is the speculation in the defining nature differently?
Too many aspects to define his form of being. I would not contradict when i say both.
Would you mind elaborating?
I think all versions of God are supernatural according to those definitions.
That does seem sort of odd to me, as if that should be the only way to think of god, that gods spliced into the very definition of supernatural.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
I really see two types of pantheism. The first is where matter/energy is everything. This is what Richard Dawkins calls 'sexed-up atheism' and this would be one of the rare times I agree with him. The second type of pantheism (which is the type I believe; Advaita) holds that God/Brahman is pure consciousness and the universe is a great thought-form of this God/Brahman.
Even a natural god wouldn't be much of a god without at least some sort of omniscience. Otherwise it would be quite a powerless universe and a product of its own limitations.
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
Even a natural god wouldn't be much of a god without at least some sort of omniscience. Otherwise it would be quite a powerless universe and a product of its own limitations.
Ok, ya. I'm not clear how that relates to my post though?
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
I can't make sense of what you mean by "supernatural".

The first definition speaks to our current scientific understanding; I've never seen anyone use the word "supernatural" in this way.

The second definition speaks to the "laws of nature." Since we're still figuring out the laws of nature, it seems to me that this definition needs either omniscience or unjustified assumptions.
Well I included two definitions and neither are sufficient? Do you think its possible for things to exist outside of any possible understanding and beyond the laws of logic and reason?
Ok, ya. I'm not clear how that relates to my post though?
Its in response to "sexed up atheism". I am not sure relabeling an atheistic outlook would necessarily be theistic. There would have to be more to it.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Well I included two definitions and neither are sufficient? Do you think its possible for things to exist outside of any possible understanding and beyond the laws of logic and reason?
Outside of any possible understanding? Sure, but unless you have a time machine, you aren't in any position to say what "any possible understanding" is.

And anything that's "outside of any possible understanding" is, well, outside of any possible understanding... IOW, nothing is known about it. This means that anyone making claims about it is just making stuff up: yes, maybe stuff exists beyond everyone's knowledge, but then it's beyond YOUR knowledge too, so you're in no position to make any claims about it.

If that's your definition of "supernatural", then we can stop talking about the supernatural now, because there's nothing more to say. If it's supernatural, we can't talk intelligently about it, and if we can talk intelligently about it, it's not supernatural.

"Beyond the laws of logic and reason"? No. If there's stuff happening in the universe that is incompatible with our understanding of logic and reason, then this is a sign that our understanding of logic and reason is incomplete and there's more to the laws of logic and reason that we realize.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Outside of any possible understanding? Sure, but unless you have a time machine, you aren't in any position to say what "any possible understanding" is.

And anything that's "outside of any possible understanding" is, well, outside of any possible understanding... IOW, nothing is known about it. This means that anyone making claims about it is just making stuff up: yes, maybe stuff exists beyond everyone's knowledge, but then it's beyond YOUR knowledge too, so you're in no position to make any claims about it.

If that's your definition of "supernatural", then we can stop talking about the supernatural now, because there's nothing more to say. If it's supernatural, we can't talk intelligently about it, and if we can talk intelligently about it, it's not supernatural.

"Beyond the laws of logic and reason"? No. If there's stuff happening in the universe that is incompatible with our understanding of logic and reason, then this is a sign that our understanding of logic and reason is incomplete and there's more to the laws of logic and reason that we realize.
This makes sense thanks. When some paint god as something that must be outside of logic and reason, there would be no reason we should be able to even think up such a deity. Surely if we can think up the deity it is well within comprehension.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Just as a soul is not tangible The Supreme Soul is also not tangible , measurable or observable , this is why I think we call Him Supernatural or Metaphysical.
The 'Father Soul' is also a reserve of all powers who refuels and is experienced in the last days when souls have drained out all their energies and become bankrupt.
How can an intangible un-measurable thing even cause anything in the physical? It seems if something is causing the brain and physical body to do something then it can be detected and measured.
 

Tabu

Active Member
The soul is the conscious , if one could determine and explain how exactly it operates on the physical being , we would no longer call it Metaphysical or Spiritual, it would be one or more of the natural sciences.
Religious leaders , scriptures , philosophers and NDE have talked about the presence of a soul or conscious .
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
The soul is the conscious , if one could determine and explain how exactly it operates on the physical being , we would no longer call it Metaphysical or Spiritual, it would be one or more of the natural sciences.
Religious leaders , scriptures , philosophers and NDE have talked about the presence of a soul or conscious .
This seems to go on the premise that the soul and/or consciousness is supernatural, which is fine to believe. Not trying to ask on how it operates or anything but just the fact that it "operates on the physical being" essentially means it is detectable one way or another.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
If its a Deity, then yeah that being is Supernatural.

Also, how do you examine a being that is by definition impossible to examine? What could Science look for when hunting for God? Its not like we can get a blood, tissue, or urine sample from him.
And say God has complete & utter control of Science & don't want to be found via Science? Sure, we can disobey him (Free Will an all), but I doubt we can alter the laws of the universe just to prove or disprove the existence of God.

My Opinion: Unless God simply shows up and yells to the entire world "Yes I'm real, talk about something else!" the only way to prove that God is real, is to somehow die, and somehow come back to life WITH irrefutable evidence back from death.
Other than that, this God debate could last all the way to the extinction of the human species.
I'm not sure we would be looking for blood, tissues samples or anything. I think a lot of folks feel that god is spiritual in nature and not necessarily a guy in the sky waiting to reward or punish based on fellowship. I suppose if God were similar to some alien being creating things and taking off, then this being could be harder to find than a god that is more like an ether force of some kind.

Here is what I mean by ether.
ether definition 3.
Physics archaic - A very rarefied and highly elastic substance formerly believed to permeate all space, including the interstices between the particles of matter, and to be the medium whose vibrations constituted light and other electromagnetic radiation.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ether

There certainly seem to be forces or substance, space-time and higgs boson, perhaps dark matter, which permeate the entire universe.
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/fifth-force-permeate-universe08182016/
 

Tabu

Active Member
@idav
How to detect the presence of the soul ? Yes, this is possible through a few questions
1. As human beings why all of us want to live in peace ? Want happiness ?Want to feel powerful , feel in control of situations. Try telling yourself, well this search for peace and happiness is vain I enjoy being in sorrow , I myself have tried telling this to myself , doesn't last long , there is a strong repulsion towards sorrow , peacelessness .We try hard to get rid of that feeling of sorrow , ( now that's a different story that we search for it in material things and it never gets quenched). Why do we want peace to survive and struggle for happiness ? So what is the common quantity within us which is in search for all these? If you say we are programed so , I would ask where is that program located , can it be detected ? and who programmed it ? That would be my answer for the soul and Supreme Soul .

2. Another beautiful example is a verse from Quran
"And I do call to witness the Nafs(the soul) that blames" (75:2)."
The question here is what is that which pricks when one does something wrong? Why does one have to give so much justification to oneself when there is a doubt whether the deed is right or wrong? What bites us when doing wrong ? Try giving charity and try snatching something from some one ? One raises your mercury levels , the other depletes you? Whereas logically speaking you should have been happier in the later case because you gained something here.

In a nutshell , " The proof for the presence of soul or conscious is the presence of the liking for good in all of us".
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
If its a Deity, then yeah that being is Supernatural.
How do you figure?

Also, how do you examine a being that is by definition impossible to examine? What could Science look for when hunting for God? Its not like we can get a blood, tissue, or urine sample from him.
"By definition"? What definition?

And what we would be looking for would be the effects of God.

And say God has complete & utter control of Science & don't want to be found via Science? Sure, we can disobey him (Free Will an all), but I doubt we can alter the laws of the universe just to prove or disprove the existence of God.

My Opinion: Unless God simply shows up and yells to the entire world "Yes I'm real, talk about something else!" the only way to prove that God is real, is to somehow die, and somehow come back to life WITH irrefutable evidence back from death.
Other than that, this God debate could last all the way to the extinction of the human species.
So then belief in God is necessarily unjustified foolishness.

There are any number of baseless, ludicrous ideas that can't be conclusively disproved. What you're saying here lumps God in with them.

Do you think that all theists are necessarily irrational? Because that's the implication of your argument.
 

Gyrannon

Agnostic Necromancer
Do you think that all theists are necessarily irrational? Because that's the implication of your argument.

I'm explaining it from a neutral view point, I'm considering the beliefs of the believers and what scientists would expect (of course I'm assuming).
And Belief honestly has become more of a feeling than a fact, cause it is one thing say "I believe God exists" and quite another to say "I know God exists".

Knowing tends to be more of a solid thing, like the person has proof. With belief, all you have is the feeling.
Is the belief in any deity irrational? Not really when you think about it. Mankind has been believing in many things that isn't fully understood.

Also, people say "God is in everything" so it doesn't matter what anyone tells the believers - look at in reverse, its like a scientist trying to convince the world that rocks are made of water. As you would probably think they are nuts, they undoubtedly think the same of you.
I've already tried taking one sided approaches to this whole mess and have seen other people do the same, you have to have a neutral view on this in order to have a better grasp on it and be able to examine it for both sides.

"By definition"? What definition?

su·per·nat·u·ral
ˌso͞opərˈnaCH(ə)rəl/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature.
"a supernatural being"
synonyms: paranormal, psychic, magic, magical, occult, mystic, mystical, superhuman, supernormal; More
noun
1.
manifestations or events considered to be of supernatural origin, such as ghosts.

God
ɡäd/
noun
noun: God; noun: god; plural noun: gods; plural noun: the gods
1.
(in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.
synonyms: the Lord, the Almighty, the Creator, the Maker, the Godhead; More
2.
(in certain other religions) a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity.
"a moon god"
synonyms: deity, goddess, divine being, celestial being, divinity, immortal, avatar
"sacrifices to appease the gods"
an image, idol, animal, or other object worshiped as divine or symbolizing a god.
synonyms: idol, graven image, icon, totem, talisman, fetish, juju
"wooden gods"
used as a conventional personification of fate.
"he dialed the number and, the gods relenting, got through at once"
3.
an adored, admired, or influential person.
"he has little time for the fashion victims for whom he is a god"
a thing accorded the supreme importance appropriate to a god.
"don't make money your god"
4.
informal
the gallery in a theater.
exclamation
exclamation: God
1.
used for emphasis or to express emotions such as surprise, anger, or distress.
"God, what did I do to deserve this?"
 
Last edited:

idav

Being
Premium Member
Could you rephrase you question, please? I'm not sure exactly what you mean.
You used the word "imagine" a deity as natural/un-natural. Though if someone is seeing a god is natural, is that just a relabeling of nature in your view? Since your saying a more naturalistic view is at least more sound.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
You used the word "imagine" a deity as natural/un-natural. Though if someone is seeing a god is natural, is that just a relabeling of nature in your view? Since your saying a more naturalistic view is at least more sound.

Thanks for the clarification. I think that in some instances, seeing god as natural could be a mere re-labeling of nature as "god". But it would depend on precisely what one meant by "nature" and "god". For instance, would it be a mere re-labeling of nature as we commonly understand it if someone were to say something along these lines, "While not beyond nature, God is an emergent property of nature", or "The universe is sentient, and its sentience is God"?
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Thanks for the clarification. I think that in some instances, seeing god as natural could be a mere re-labeling of nature as "god". But it would depend on precisely what one meant by "nature" and "god". For instance, would it be a mere re-labeling of nature as we commonly understand it if someone were to say something along these lines, "While not beyond nature, God is an emergent property of nature", or "The universe is sentient, and its sentience is God"?
I can see that. It would depend on whether there is a significant difference in how someone is describing nature itslef. In which case I do see where speculation would come into play.
 

Whiterain

Get me off of this planet
Aztecan Ruins anytime you want to disturb the US Govment. It's like pocket sand. Aztecan Ruins, pocket sand. They just denounce responsibility for things administration after administration, and this country speaks of honor and glory, belittling the skeletons in the closet to this day. Then when they do produce some disclosure it is silly and insulting to your intelligence. I am about to not care anymore.. I'm not a bleeding heart, but I have to get the vile disgust out of my system.

Pocket sand, huzzah. They're all over the Mississippi Delta or whatever and I'm sure they had a pretty cool God too.

They used to sacrifice by the tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, to appease the Sun Gods blood lust, not really. As a matter of fact I have no idea what the heck was going on over intrinsic genocide and evolution.

The Native were still in the stone age unfortunately, some of them had mystical weapons, other sticks and stones. I am broken of sympothy but the brutality that came next is a disgrace to this noble country, it was an organized genocide of the Aboriginal people of Mesa.

Pocket sand
Pocket sand
Pocket sand

I'm not about to catch a .306 over dead ones, let the dead worry about the dead, namean.


It was hot them days, and they was still lizard people running around, we get'em.

In later News they was a weave war at the crossroads, I was considering conducting a deal for calculus, if Satan can procure the arithmetic, he's is said to likely to rip me off. Probably a 9mm parabellum, Michieel goes on about the excellence of its design. He shoots lots of guns. He's troop.
 
Top