metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
You're barking up the wrong tree.I ousia, three. Which verse?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're barking up the wrong tree.I ousia, three. Which verse?
According to my religion of Christian Matrixism, God is well defined as being a controller of simulations, a reality based virtual world programmer of human consciousness. Jesus Christ is simply God's Holy Spirt incarnated., God's Word appearing in human form.Is God three beings in one being according to christians on RF?
Is God three beings in one being according to christians on RF?
Be careful as to whom you call your 'fathers'. It shows where your allegiance lies.I am not describing a hierarchy, I am describing the Monarchy of the Father. Now one may truly say with respect to causation that the Father is greater than the Son, which the Lord Jesus says "the Father is greater than I" (and a Person is not a nature so truly He says this of His Person), which the Church Fathers concur with:
St. Basil saying: "Since the Son’s origin is from the Father, in this respect the Father is greater, as cause and origin."
St. John Chrysostom saying: "If any one say that the Father is greater, inasmuch as He is the cause of the Son, we will not contradict this. But this does not by any means make the Son to be of a different Essence."
And so on. As I said, I am sticking to what the Fathers say, and the Scriptures also. Wikipedia has the order of theology kind of awkward there, and "sharing" is outright false and not the Trinitarian position.
All in my opinion of course.
Be careful as to whom you call your 'fathers'. It shows where your allegiance lies.
As I've mentioned more than once before, each of the NT's Jesuses ─ those of Paul, Mark, Matthew, Luke and John ─ denies that he's God and never claims to be God. The Trinity doctrine, which contradicts those denials, isn't invented till the 4th century CE to solve the politics of how to raise the central character of Christianity to God status while avoiding taunts that they're polytheists like the pagans (which indeed Trinitarians are).Is God three beings in one being according to christians on RF?
You're barking up the wrong tree.
Given we accept the Trinity notion, then if the Father has his own will, if Jesus has his own will, if the Ghost has his own will, then they won't always agree.
YesSo you do not believe in the trinity? Do you believe only the Father is God?
Trinity is not biblical
This is the standard Christian belief, that there is one God in three persons. However, no one besides Christians believes it. Indeed, Jews find the dilution of the one-ness of God to be offensive.Is God three beings in one being according to christians on RF?
Thank you.There is only one will, will is proper to nature in Trinitarian theology. Jesus (which refers to the Incarnate Word) has two wills because He has two natures in the same theology.
So do the Muslims.Indeed, Jews find the dilution of the one-ness of God to be offensive.
it makes no sense
Grateful for the references to your quotes.What about that statement makes no sense to you?
a spirit isn't a person. a person can have a spirit but that is understood as a soul with relationship to the incarnation on earth. the bible in facts states without question that god is not a man, nor the son of man, thus god is not a person
Is God three beings in one being according to christians on RF?
Not every hindu believe the 8 billion gods is manifestations of only one God. But yes some hindus believe all the gods is manifestations of only one God
Neither are automobiles, and yet they exist.That was your claim metis.
And its not there in the Bible.
Neither are automobiles, and yet they exist.