chevron1
Active Member
the buddhists argue that we are all transgender. the taoists do not argue this but say we are a mix of yin and yang. that's the buddhists are turning into women and women are turning into men.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is Homosexuality a illness? And how to heal?
- Thread starter Servant_of_the_One1
- Start date
the buddhists argue that we are all transgender. the taoists do not argue this but say we are a mix of yin and yang. that's the buddhists are turning into women and women are turning into men.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
slipping someone a mickey of a hormone pill does not constitute either "hormone therapy" or "sex change." It constitutes assault.
chevron1
Active Member
it is assault but it is also sex change.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
No it's not. It means they think that the whole human being contains both male and female elements. It doesn't mean that one "turns into" the other sex.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
No. It's not. It means that an elevated quantity of estrogen was introduced into a male without his consent.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
David Reimer serves as a warning of what can happen when someone is assigned to the wrong gender. There are also many intersexual people who experience dysphoria over being assigned to the wrong sex, despite efforts to raise and socialism them from infancy as their surgically-assigned sex.
You literally have one extreme outlier filled with many questions as an example to be weighed against many that show otherwise.
If you read the Standards of Care, which I provided a link to, you would know that hormone therapy in-and-of-itself does not constitute a sex change. Several years ago, in a town in England, doctors noticed a sharp increase of men requesting mastecomies. It turned out some farmers had been dumping cow contraceptives into the water, and the hormones were causing men nearby to grow breasts. However, they were never considered women or to have been sex-changed.
chevron1
Active Member
yes it does mean that a person MUST contain male and female. that's why they take hormones to control their libido and to transform.
the hormones transition regardless of consent. that's why it was in the kool aid.
chevron1
Active Member
ether-ore
Active Member
I know sufficient for my needs. I'm not homosexual, but my own addiction to sex unfortunately brought me into contact with quite a few homosexuals. From the many that I was exposed to, they are always on the prowl. My own experience gave me an education. So I don't consider myself ignorant on the subject. Besides, I said it was my choice. I prefer to be obedient to God. I've been married, twice... I'm not inclined to want to go down that path again. All things considered, there is little or no benefit to it.
chevron1
Active Member
exactly why there are doctors and religious people who want to transgenderize gays!!
er, no: "in loco parentis" means "in place of parents" and is the term for someone acting as a parent in their stead. And I'm pretty sure it's not a legal term, just a descriptive one
chevron1
Active Member
'
in parentis loco means that parents have a right to take control of your life, even if you are not the actual biological parents but can assert in parentis loco.
it is a legal term, if you can find it in blackwell's.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It's sad that you would so callously make a mockery of such a life. He was screwed at birth by a doctor who thought wrong, his parents were horribly misguided, and his life ended in suicide. It was believed he could be raised as a girl, and would accept being female, but he didn't.he serves as a warning of the coming of baphomet!!!!
And the way you have been using Baphoment, I doubt you realize the symbols true meaning.
If you have a sex addiction, then why would you tell me that homosexuality is a "trap?" Most people do not have a sex addiction, and to them it is not like a crack addiction. And just because you have a sex addiction doesn't mean others are always on the prowl.
And you told me that I was the one looking at things with the wrong perspective.
Actually it is, it just isn't common.
If a kids parents get killed in a car wreck the court will appoint someone to represent them legally. Usually a family member, they are not taking full responsibility or getting custody. Just acting as parents temporarily while things get sorted.
Tom
chevron1
Active Member
yes, and this is one theory (in parentis loco) under which a religious worker could give gay reparative therapy to someone without their consent. they would get consent first from one parent, a temporary transfer of parental rights.
No. That is simply wrong.
As long as an underage person has a parent there is no reason to assign legal responsibility. The parent might consent to something, but that is not the same.
Tom
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
No, they really don't. It takes a long regimen of hormones to effect a transition.
gsa
Well-Known Member
OK, think reaaaaly rationally about this for a minute. You were traveling in the circles of sex addicts, and the sex addicts that you met who were homosexuals were always on the prowl. You were hanging around sex addicts! This is like assuming that every person who drinks wine is an alcoholic based on your anecdotal survey of wine drinkers you happened to meet at AA meetings.
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
That "without consent" part is unethical and illegal. And reparative therapy is known for causing damage and harm to the client, and is illegal in some places.
That really depends. Emotionally, it only takes about a week or two for changes to effect. Certain body changes begin to occur approximately one to two months into it, up to about six months, depending on what area you are looking at, such as reduction in body hair (6-12 months), reduction in oily skin and softening of skin (3-6 months), fat redistribution (3-6 months), development of breasts (3-6 months), cessation of male-pattern baldness (1-3 months), decrease muscle mass (3-6 months) and most things take 1-3 years to achieve full effect.
sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Compared to one dose in a cup of Kool-Aid, that's a long regimen.