I saw that post. It's meaningless, does not even attempt to address the contradiction inherent to 'free will' being imposed by an all-knowing deity beyond repeating your initial assertion, and is borderline preaching.
You can say "free will" as much as you like but it doesn't change the fact that an all-knowing, all-powerful god ultimately means existence is deterministic and that the Quran itsels says I can't accept Islam as the true religion unless he decides I will. Your own scripture says that. If we can't make a decision free of Allah's interference or without his foreknowledge then existence isn't conducive to free will.
And yet it seems to be okay when the people at
Answering Christianity do the exact same thing or when Muslim-UK does it in post #131. Why is this cherry-picking acceptable when Muslims do it but when non-Muslims like myself do it's suddenly not allowed? I never see you call them out on it. I wonder why...
Quite the non-sequitur you have there. Unfortunately for you the problem is two-fold. You've got to evidence the claim that:
- Sentience is the result of a god;
- Sentience is the result of your god.
Even if we take your baseless assertion that Stone Age humans were born knowing and worshipping a single god as true, that still leaves you with the problem of evidencing that they were worshipping Allah. In fact, archaeology shows that it's far more likely that if a Great Maker religion was present or prevalent in the Stone Age it was centred around the worship of
Goddess such as the Earth Mother, not God.
Do they? First off, I'd be surprised if most non-theists called a
process 'random'. Secondly, I'll need to see a source for this claim.
Evolution by natural selection.
It's funny; a millennium ago the fact that humans were utterly helpless in the face of virulent diseases such as the Black Death was all the evidence necessary to convince the pious that there was a god and that it was theirs'. Yet look at where we are now; we understand a multitude of diseases, their symptoms, life cycles and how to treat them. All it took was time and the application of science.
Islamic ones.
Depends on the person you ask, I suppose. Personally, I'd measure my success in happiness rather than wealth.
And what, you think these problems are removed simply by adopting Islam? Are you real?
Life is what you make of it. The insinuation that non-Muslims, by dint of being non-Muslims, must be miserable is seriously condescending.
This is called 'begging the question' and is a logical fallacy. You're asking us to presuppose your assertion (in bold) is true as part of a wider claim.
If observable reality which any half-wit could notice is the basis for what constitutes 'divine revelation' then that sure explains a lot.
Why is it okay for
you to quote Quran verses out of context but when non-Muslims do the exact same thing it's suddenly wrong?
The hypocrisy is staggering.
So you agree that people being sent to hell for not accepting Islam is Allah's fault?