Sorry, I don't agree with one here.
I believe in "G-d exists" very naturally, as I believe in my father and mother. G-d is Evident, and Evident does not need any evidence. If He had needed any evidence, then He would have not had the attribute of being Evident.
Atheism as the word depicts is pegged with Belief in G-d which presupposes that humans believed in the existence of G-d very naturally.
Right, please?
Regards
Your belief is your belief. Your belief is not evidence. Without evidence of coffee how could anyone say macchiato exists? Without evidence of elephants how could anyone be sure elephants exist? Without evidence of pink unicorns how could anyone imagine pink unicorns exist? And without evidence of god how can anyone say god exists?... All they can confirm if they do not have evidence is that they
believe.
Belief : acceptance that something exists or is true
without proof.
Evidence : the available
body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
Please show me one newborn with a belief in god. Please show me any child who has a belief in god unless they have previously been indoctrinated into that belief. Please show me one child indoctrinated into one of the abrahamic faiths who believes in Thor or Aries are the one gods.
Atheism as a word and a mind state means one, and only one thing : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
I have provided this definition for you on several occasions and still you try to impose your will on the recognised definition. Why your fixation with trying to discredit atheism? Is is obvious you do not understand atheism.