• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is It Really Just Your Body?

Sand Dancer

Currently catless
It isn't a right to kill a baby in the womb for any reason. Why is abortion often said to be morally ok and yet if a person was to kill a pregnant woman, the person is charged with a double murder?

It depends on the state. In the Bible, it's just a fine given to the husband, unless the woman dies, then it's murder.
 

tarasan

Well-Known Member
Still dependent upon it's host for survival, until third trimester(ish). As I said the woman has (had) the right to make that decision. And if you don't think she does. Watch them do it illegally one way or the other. Even the church used to help perform abortions.

As even worse than the pain one buddy, 5 year olds are dependant on their mother. Leave toddler in a forest and see how long they last. Just because someone is dependant on u doesn't mean u have control over life or death. We outlawed murder but people still do it buddy, and as for the church I honestly don't care what they did beforehand it what we do now that is important. I mean we have people in hospitals dependant on people we don't arbitrarily kill them.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
As even worse than the pain one buddy, 5 year olds are dependant on their mother. Leave toddler in a forest and see how long they last. Just because someone is dependant on u doesn't mean u have control over life or death. We outlawed murder but people still do it buddy, and as for the church I honestly don't care what they did beforehand it what we do now that is important. I mean we have people in hospitals dependant on people we don't arbitrarily kill them.

A 5 year old isn't dependent on its mother breathing for him to survive. Nice try.

They also aren't required to both be connected via a dialysis machine for them both to survive either.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
On the belief that murder is wrong which is true for most of the world population.
Yes, only that most of the world's population doesn't agree upon what murder is. When we take the usual definition of "unlawful killing" we see that we don't argue morality but legality. And then abortion is only wrong when it's prohibited.
Can you formulate that so that it's a moral imperative that doesn't depend on legality?
 

amorphous_constellation

Well-Known Member
I don't agree with the pro choice argument. The way I see it is the mother is carrying a child who also has a body of their own.

Well there are 4 ideas, that sort of go together here. There is a pregnant mother; a mother and a fetus, and both are embedded in society, and all of that is embedded in nature. Nature > society > mother > fetus. It seems relevant that sometimes, society and/or nature make some choices for the humans in it. We have go along with the constraints and rules, as they emanate from the two forces that are external to us.

And so you can with this mathematical arrangement, the mother would have primacy over the fetus. Just as the forces to the left of the mother, in the equation, might have primacy over individual humans
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Yes, only that most of the world's population doesn't agree upon what murder is. When we take the usual definition of "unlawful killing" we see that we don't argue morality but legality. And then abortion is only wrong when it's prohibited.
Can you formulate that so that it's a moral imperative that doesn't depend on legality?
Gooblygook. We know in our hearts that taking an innocent human life is wrong. It's nothing to do with legality.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Gooblygook. We know in our hearts that taking an innocent human life is wrong. It's nothing to do with legality.
Who is that "We"? Because I make decisions with by mind and I don't have to constrain life to "innocent" to make my ethics work.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
On the belief that murder is wrong which is true for most of the world population.
"Murder" is a legal term that would only apply here ft the civil laws on the books said it is "murder".

If an 18-year-old is raped and becomes pregnant and gets a planned abortion in a state whereas getting an abortion would be classified as "murder", would you be willing as a judge to give her the death sentence? This is quite possibly a real case scenario, btw.
 
Top