Beaudreaux
Well-Known Member
the angel did not say that God would physically impregnate Mary but that: Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee
Ewwwwwww!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
the angel did not say that God would physically impregnate Mary but that: Luke 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon thee
That's crude and tasteless. All I said was that God was the literal Father of Jesus Christ, just as Mary was the literal mother of Jesus Christ. She was a virgin when she conceived and gave birth to her son, according to the Bible. If she did not conceive by having sexual intercourse, that's your answer.Doesn't that mean that God put sperm into her womb without breaking her hymen. Kind of like the coin through the table trick, but with holy semen?
Crude and tasteless??? YOU'RE the one claiming that Mary got pregnant from God. The physicality of that is how you define it. If Jesus was fully human, then Mary's eggs had to be fertilized. That means God had to connect it with a sperm. And if she was still a virgin, then God didn't break her hymen in the process. Am I wrong here?That's crude and tasteless. All I said was that God was the literal Father of Jesus Christ, just as Mary was the literal mother of Jesus Christ. She was a virgin when she conceived and gave birth to her son, according to the Bible. If she did not conceive by having sexual intercourse, that's your answer.
Seriously though, if Jesus was fully man as well as fully God, then he had DNA. Half his chromasomes came from Mary and, if Christianity is right, half came from God. Do Christians believe there is any significance to this Holy genetic material? How did God go about selecting his physical traits?
Hellooo, McFlyyyyy? Have I said something incorrect here?Crude and tasteless??? YOU'RE the one claiming that Mary got pregnant from God. The physicality of that is how you define it. If Jesus was fully human, then Mary's eggs had to be fertilized. That means God had to connect it with a sperm. And if she was still a virgin, then God didn't break her hymen in the process. Am I wrong here?
Hellooo, McFlyyyyy? Have I said something incorrect here?
Because He had to be born human with flesh and blood. It would have been nothing for a supernatural being to die and be raised from the dead. The mother had to be a virgin proving that she was his mother and that another man could not have been the father.....Who else said they were born of a virgin? The descending comes later, but he did ascend which still proves nothing to the unbeliever....They conclude that Superman can also fly.....but why go thur all the confusion of having mary? why not be born with out eather parent? see the problem is jesus was not the first to come along and say that he was gods son born of a virgin. why not have jesus desend form heaven?
Mary was not the mother? More of a surrogate?There would have been no eggs,
so the surrogate was with out sin?
but the catholics belive that mary was with out sin
Mary was not the mother? More of a surrogate?