is not WMD invent to be used? just tell me when and where ?

[Godobeyer]

Hello all

for my opinion the world was many times in edge of THE END ,because some "smart" humans invent the most dangerous weapons in human history!!!

why just Iran and NK , that world focus on , many of countries had WMD weapons , especialy (USA, RUSSIA) ?

whom invented is love humanity ?
whom producing is care about humanity ?
do you think whom stock these weapons care about humanity ?
whom using is would care about humanity ?

Just imagine Turkey (the supporter) of Daesh will cause WW3, so RUSSIA respond badly and NATO respond badly on RUSSIA and go on , go on ...etc


just tell me when and where it's will be used ?

 

[Iti oj]

are you familiar eith mad? Mutually assured destruction. its this crazy idea that if any one drops a nuke we all drop nukes, ergo no one drops a nuke.

 

[Godobeyer]

are you familiar eith mad? Mutually assured destruction. its this crazy idea that if any one drops a nuke we all drop nukes, ergo no one drops a nuke.

SO If Japan had Nukes at WW2 , so very probebly they used it against USA , as revenge ?

how you be sure that the owners of WMD , will not used it , just because this "golden law ; if you drop , i will drop on you too " ?

 

[Iti oj]

SO If Japan had Nukes at WW2 , so very probebly they used it against USA , as revenge ?

how you be sure that the owners of WMD , will not used it , just because this "golden law ; if you drop , i will drop on you too " ?

mad was developed until after ww2 during the cold war.

 

[Godobeyer]

mad was developed until after ww2 during the cold war.

I know that

what you think , if NATO and RUSSIA start a war because of stupidity of Turkey leaders

 

[Augustus]

mad was developed until after ww2 during the cold war.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Soviet submarines had been authorised to deploy nuclear weapons, the choice lay with individual commanders.

It was only one individual, Vasili Arkhipov, refusing to ratify the decision of 2 other commanders to fire a nuke that prevented a nuclear war.


Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov (Russian: Василий Александрович Архипов) (30 January 1926 – 19 August 1998) was a Soviet Navyofficer who prevented a nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Only Arkhipov, as flotilla commander and second-in-command of the nuclear-weaponized submarine B-59, refused to authorize the captain's use of nuclear torpedos against the United States Navy, a decision requiring the agreement of all three senior officers aboard. In 2002 Thomas Blanton, who was then director of the National Security Archive, said that "a guy called Vasili Arkhipov saved the world".[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Arkhipov#K-19_accident



Nukes will be used sooner or later. I just hope it is later...

 

[Sunstone]

Nukes will be used sooner or later. I just hope it is later...

Yup. That's what will happen sooner or later. And that's because our brains are so much superior to the other great apes.

 

[Godobeyer]

Yup. That's what will happen sooner or later. And that's because our brains are so much superior to the other great apes.

what do you think about who invented nuclear weapon, is good person or evil person ?

 

[Lyndon]

Invented by a person that had more knowledge than common sense, IMHO.

 

[Augustus]

what do you think about who invented nuclear weapon, is good person or evil person ?

They would be invented by someone sooner or later.

Am glad America had one before USSR did.

 

[Godobeyer]

They would be invented by someone sooner or later.

Am glad America had one before USSR did.

I am just curious if Japan in WW2 had this weapon , did USA dare to attack Japan by it ?

 

[Revoltingest]

I am just curious if Japan in WW2 had this weapon , did USA dare to attack Japan by it ?

The US would still likely use nukes against Japan because the latter had no way to deliver a bomb to Americastan.
Delivery systems are crucial, which is why they receive so much attention & resources.

 

[Godobeyer]

The US would still likely use nukes against Japan because the latter had no way to deliver a bomb to Americastan.
Delivery systems are crucial, which is why they receive so much attention & resources.

so it's ok for USA leader that Japan wipe up Florida or NY , just because they want to use it !!!

how about now, what you think ? let's suppose the situation goes to worst between Russian and Turkey , then Russia used nuclear weapon against Turkey , how the NATO respond for that , they would used nukes against Russian (as revenge) too ?

 

[Iti oj]

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Soviet submarines had been authorised to deploy nuclear weapons, the choice lay with individual commanders.

It was only one individual, Vasili Arkhipov, refusing to ratify the decision of 2 other commanders to fire a nuke that prevented a nuclear war.


Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov (Russian: Василий Александрович Архипов) (30 January 1926 – 19 August 1998) was a Soviet Navyofficer who prevented a nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Only Arkhipov, as flotilla commander and second-in-command of the nuclear-weaponized submarine B-59, refused to authorize the captain's use of nuclear torpedos against the United States Navy, a decision requiring the agreement of all three senior officers aboard. In 2002 Thomas Blanton, who was then director of the National Security Archive, said that "a guy called Vasili Arkhipov saved the world".[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Arkhipov#K-19_accident



Nukes will be used sooner or later. I just hope it is later...

Thanks for the history lesson. And that guy is a hero!

 

[Iti oj]

so it's ok for USA leader that Japan wipe up Florida or NY , just because they want to use it !!!

how about now, what you think ? let's suppose the situation goes to worst between Russian and Turkey , then Russia used nuclear weapon against Turkey , how the NATO respond for that , they would used nukes against Russian (as revenge) too ?

We haven't unjustly attacked japan. so unfair comparison, you forget japan had attacked us at peal harbor.

 

[Revoltingest]

so it's ok for USA leader that Japan wipe up Florida or NY , just because they want to use it !!!

It's not about being "OK", or the mere "want" to use it.
The 2 countries were at war.
In war, one uses what one has.

how about now, what you think ? let's suppose the situation goes to worst between Russian and Turkey , then Russia used nuclear weapon against Turkey , how the NATO respond for that , they would used nukes against Russian (as revenge) too ?

I'd rather that they not use nukes.

 

[Godobeyer]

We haven't unjustly attacked japan. so unfair comparison, you forget japan had attacked us at peal harbor.

yes as i know Japan involved in war against allies ,and USA too , what Japan attacked in peal harbor ?
i watch the movie , they attacked a base of navy "military", but USA attacked cities "civilians" , so is not that unfair comparison targets ?

 

[Flankerl]

We haven't unjustly attacked japan. so unfair comparison, you forget japan had attacked us at peal harbor.

*cough* US Oil embargo *cough*

so it's ok for USA leader that Japan wipe up Florida or NY , just because they want to use it !!!

War is war. If you win you are right.
If you lose you aren't.

how about now, what you think ? let's suppose the situation goes to worst between Russian and Turkey , then Russia used nuclear weapon against Turkey , how the NATO respond for that , they would used nukes against Russian (as revenge) too ?

It's better not to think about something like this.
First because its rather grim and no ordinary person could do anything against it.

And secondly because it simply won't happen. Russia is already hurting Turkey with its economic sanctions.


And what you really have to understand is that there is no "right" or "wrong" in war. Categories like this are made up in peaceful times. War is war.

i watch the movie

Haha
Movies are ... well movies.

Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were major industrial cities who were producing for the war effort.
And such cities were bombed during WW2 by all sides.

 

[Godobeyer]

It's not about being "OK", or the mere "want" to use it.
The 2 countries were at war.
In war, one uses what one has.

I get it

I'd rather that they not use nukes.

I hope so
as you said before , who knows ," in war ,one uses what one has"

 

[Revoltingest]

I hope so
as you said before , who knows ," in war ,one uses what one has"

No country honors my preferences.