• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is premarital sex really a sin?

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
I see. It's depravity to grant equal rights to people based on the biases of others and keep them from pursuing happiness. Wonderful.
Yes, there are certainly occasions when some members of society must be deprived of their happiness.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
You're still comparing illegal, abusive aberrations with normal, healthy relationships. Children are unable to give consent to such relationships, and it has been proven that such relationships are emotionally damaging to people whose brains are not developed enough to handle the relationships. It's like comparing a high five with a much in the face. Both involve touching with the hands, but the similarity ends there.
Nothing healthy in my opinion with regard to homosexual relationships.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
No its not. Homosexual love isn't immoral. It's a religious purity issue, which has no place in the lawmaking procedures in this country.

You've decided to join the fight to grant equal marriage rights to homosexuals in all states, then? Great! Thank you!

What's moral and depraved is sexual discrimination.
Yes, of course.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Nothing healthy in my opinion with regard to homosexual relationships.
Your opinion. That's what's most important to the issue because, as we've all been made aware, this is the Universe According to Sonofason. And we should all forego decency, morality, duty, and our own contributions to the good of society in order to insure your comfort level.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Your opinion. That's what's most important to the issue because, as we've all been made aware, this is the Universe According to Sonofason. And we should all forego decency, morality, duty, and our own contributions to the good of society in order to insure your comfort level.
Yes, in my opinion, my opinion is the only opinion that matters.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Blanket statements of this kind may be seen as quite bigoted. Do you think all homosexual relationships are the same?
Sorry, no. I believe that a homosexual can have healthy relationships, say with their mothers, their fathers, their siblings, acquaintances, friends, etc., just not with their so called lovers.
 

Uberpod

Active Member
Sorry, no. I believe that a homosexual can have healthy relationships, say with their mothers, their fathers, their siblings, acquaintances, friends, etc., just not with their so called lovers.
Are you comfortable with being labeled a bigot?
 

Uberpod

Active Member
Yes being called or labeled a bigot means nothing to me. I know that I am not a bigot, and it's my opinion that matters.
Please, link me to someone who you think values your opinion at all whatsoever. And, revisit the definition of bigot.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Please, link me to someone who you think values your opinion at all whatsoever. And, revisit the definition of bigot.
No, I don't hate or dislike anyone. I don't dislike homosexuals. And I certainly don't treat them unfairly. I accept all homosexuals, but I will not condone their behavior. Sorry, that's not bigotry. But I'll be okay if you continue to think it is.
 

Uberpod

Active Member
No, I don't hate or dislike anyone. I don't dislike homosexuals. And I certainly don't treat them unfairly. I accept all homosexuals, but I will not condone their behavior. Sorry, that's not bigotry. But I'll be okay if you continue to think it is.
I shouldn't be surprised that actual definition of words or things like data simply do not matter to you.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
I shouldn't be surprised that actual definition of words or things like data simply do not matter to you.
Sorry, I read the definition, and it does not apply to me. But you are free to continue being disingenuous if you wish. It's okay with me.
 

Uberpod

Active Member
Sorry, I read the definition, and it does not apply to me. But you are free to continue being disingenuous if you wish. It's okay with me.

Per Merriam-Webster:
A person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group with intolerance.

Your picture is next to this entry. Do I have to link you back to your own comments in this thread to prove it to you?
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
Per Merriam-Webster:
A person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group with intolerance.

Your picture is next to this entry. Do I have to link you back to your own comments in this thread to prove it to you?
You can try, but it won't do you any good. You're wrong, and you're just going to have to live with that. I know me far better than you ever will, and I know words and their meanings. You can't fool me. I'm on to you.
 

Sonofason

Well-Known Member
You can try, but it won't do you any good. You're wrong, and you're just going to have to live with that. I know me far better than you ever will, and I know words and their meanings. You can't fool me. I'm on to you.
The question remains, not whether or not I'm a bigot, but is premarital sex a sin. How about you answer that question, and respect the OP of this thread instead?

Or does everything with you have to be about homosexuals?
 
Top