• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is religion making us all stupid ?

omega2xx

Well-Known Member
Ha, that's me at 25, I am older than that now, but what has the past to do with it ?.

The younger one is, the less they know about America in the past 40-50 years. I lived during that time and America was a much better and safer place to live then. Yes we had race problems, but we worked on them and resolved most to them. At least 40-50 people were not getting shot in Chicago 40 years ago.
 

omega2xx

Well-Known Member
Well because in my thinking and many others there has never been proof of a god, so therefore there was no god the give the message, and so the message was their own thoughts.

Thinking does not prove the thinking is accurate. I think logic demands a God. See how that works?
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
The younger one is, the less they know about America in the past 40-50 years. I lived during that time and America was a much better and safer place to live then. Yes we had race problems, but we worked on them and resolved most to them. At least 40-50 people were not getting shot in Chicago 40 years ago.
Yes it certainly has changed, but then back about 35 years ago, I was shot while driving on a highway just out of my town here in Australia. :(
 

omega2xx

Well-Known Member
Yes it certainly has changed, but then back about 35 years ago, I was shot while driving on a highway just out of my town here in Australia. :(

Surely you are not suggesting one person getting shot is equilevent to 40-50 a day, and that is in just one city.
 

JakofHearts

2 Tim 1.7
Modern historians have a much more positive view of Islam's contribution to science, the arts, and civilisation. Some historians would consider that Middle Ages Europe owed more to Islam than any other contempory source. The sheer breath and depth of knowledge and skills is beyond anything that I'm able to concisely portray on RF.

Islamic Golden Age - Wikipedia

Islam would be much more appropriately compared to Christianity and Judaism, than the Visigoths or Vikings. All 3 are Abrahamic Faiths, with a belief in monotheism, a Manifestation of God or Holy Man who has brough forth a revelation from that One God, and sacred text that with some degree of authenticity represent Their Teachings. These sacred texts have been the inspiration intellectually as well as spiritually that have stimulated the arts and sciences. In each instance there has been a flowering of civilisation.

Is it fair for a Christian to compare Muslims to barbarians because they have have conquered weakened lands when Christian history is full of such wars and conquests? How does Christian civilisation rate in regards to human slavery? Do the Teachings of Jesus or the Apostles explicitly forbid slavery? In regards to rediscovering the antiquities the Muslims readily recognised the treasure they had and made use of it. How about Christian institutions who clearly struggled for centuries with science, especially when it challenged orthodox belief. How tolerant were the Christians to other cultures or even other Christians, for example during the crusades?

I'm admittedly just a student of history but it appears that Islam had a golden age when Western Europe had the relative darkness of the middle ages.
You know, I'd appreciate it if you took the time to at least consider my points and address them directly so I can recognize where the contradiction and inconsistency lies, so I can correct you. To paint Islamic history with a broad brush only generates a politically correct pseudo-history. In terms of the OP, maybe there is credence in mobile phones, technology dimming the mind a little, i.e. Facebook, wikipedia, etc.

If you may, I'd encourage you to listen to a neutral source on the matter of the Islamic golden age. Shoot to 5:00 and try to pay attention when he begins to talk about this 300 year period in Islamic history and know why Islam continued to this day barbarism while the West advanced.


Just a couple of other points I'd like to address, as you mentioned Islam as comparable to Christianity. To some extent due to partially accepting Jesus and the Torah into their doctrines, Islam is by no means comparable to Christianity in any shape or form. Islam is more in line with the pagan moon god from pre-Islamic times in which it gets it's origins.

How tolerant were the Christians to other cultures or even other Christians, for example during the crusades?
And this misconception of the crusades, though being not at all in line with Jesus, the basis of Christianity, the crusades and jihad are a non-comparison anyway.
A historian researched the jihad throughout it's history and found 548 battles that Islam fought against the West and other civilizations, and this isn't even all the battles. It doesn't say much about Africa and India, Afghanistan, etc; it's primarily focus were on the battles against the classical civilizations of Europe and the Middle East.

Source of jihad battles: http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/charts/Islam-BattlesDate.pdf

6RT4PwH.png


cVHadly.png

Lets talk facts.

Yes, there were crusades but notice the comparison, the crusades ended centuries ago, and jihad is still practised today; Jihad has been with us for 1400+ years. There is no comparison between jihad and the crusades; certainly not a moral comparison. In one sense all of the Crusades were defensive wars. Why? It was Islam that came out of Arabia and conquered the Middle East, a Christian Middle East. And so the crusaders were trying to bring defense and safety for Christians from jihad. So there is no moral comparison at all. The motivation of the crusades was to gain a defensive foothold for Christians and Christian holy lands; the purpose of jihad was to literally enslave and assimilate the Kafir.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
You know, I'd appreciate it if you took the time to at least consider my points

I've carefully considered your points. That why I took a few days to respond.

so I can correct you.

You don't think that could sound a little patronising?

To paint Islamic history with a broad brush only generates a politically correct pseudo-history.
And you can also dismiss Islamic history with another broad brush reflecting the far right perspective.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
I'd encourage you to listen to a neutral source on the matter of the Islamic golden age.
Thanks for sharing. It raises some interesting points.

Islam is by no means comparable to Christianity in any shape or form
Thats debatable. The Muslim God Allah, and the Jewish God Yahweh look very similar. Did the Jews and Christians not believe in the same God?
 
Last edited:

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
the crusades and jihad are a non-comparison anyway.
So how was the massacre of all the inhabitants of Jerusalem inspired by the book of Joshua a pre emptive stike and morally better than the Muslims?

found 548 battles that Islam fought against the West and other civilizations,
You are good at research. How many battles have the Christians fought against other civilisations as well as themselves?
 
Last edited:

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
Lets talk facts.
I'm happy to explore the facts. Its probably getting a little off track from the original OP though. Shall we start a new thread? I'm sure it's all been done before on RF anyhow.
 
Last edited:

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
You can do whatever you like on this thread, maybe it will make it more interesting lol.

Hi Psychoslice. Thanks for many great moments this year. Have a nice Christmas and New Year and or Holiday season. I always enjoyed your posts and learnt a lot from you and I share many of your views.
 

loverofhumanity

We are all the leaves of one tree
Premium Member
Religion can either make you more aware and a better person, or it can be a bad attribute.


Take your pick

It depends on the condition of our hearts. If our hearts have rich soil (sincerity & humility) in them, then fruitful trees can be planted which will make us a better person, but if the soil of our heart is barren (full of pride & ego)or even like concrete then no matter how good the seed is it will not grow or bring forth fruit. But it will not make us bad as it won't even grow in our hearts.

It is our hearts which are good or bad not religion. Holy Books only teach good not evil.
 

psychoslice

Veteran Member
Hi Psychoslice. Thanks for many great moments this year. Have a nice Christmas and New Year and or Holiday season. I always enjoyed your posts and learnt a lot from you and I share many of your views.
Ah, thank you so much for those beautiful words loverofhumanity, they are very much appreciated, and you also have a wonderful Christmas, and a happy new year. :beermug::)
 
Top