• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is the Christian cross a symbol representing Scapegoating?

This is not possible. I have to refer to your interpretation of scripture. Because if we agreed on the what the same scripture meant there would be no debate.

1. Christ is not a victim. He (God Himself) came up with this idea. Then gave it as an option for us.

2. I do not blame Christ for my mistakes. I thank Him for covering up for my mistakes. But He is not to blame.

3. I do not believe in the once saved always saved theory that some Christians do. So yes I am still accountable for any sin I commit after salvation. Which is why I pray to God/Jesus for forgiveness time to time for any recent sin. Should I die with any unrepentant sin then I shall be held accountable for it.


Jesus (as) isn't God.

I refer you to the Greatest Commandment :

"The Lord OUR God is ONE GOD."

2 facts prove that Jesus (as) be God. 1. He has a God. God does not have a God.

2. God is ONE GOD, and since Jesus (as) is who said this, he CAN'T be the same God who he next commands us to "Worship HIM with all your heart..."

Any argument based on the myth that the Bible even says Jesus is God (it in fact does not, not even John 1 in original Greek or just honestly translated) is invalid.

Because Jesus (as) worshipped God and was not God. According to Jesus (as). His Father is OUR Father, his God is OUR God.

Also if God could die like Christians say Jesus did, the world would cease to exist. Obviously God did not die. And if Jesus (as) Ascended to Heaven alive, he did not die either. There is nothing sacrificial about dying if nothing actually dies, Jesus (as) got rewarded if anything, the opposite of sacrificed.

If he went to hell for your sins, that's a sacrifice, if he is in Heaven you are being fooled because he did not sacrifice a damn thing. Not his life, nothing.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
Jesus (as) isn't God.

I refer you to the Greatest Commandment :

"The Lord OUR God is ONE GOD."

2 facts prove that Jesus (as) be God. 1. He has a God. God does not have a God.

2. God is ONE GOD, and since Jesus (as) is who said this, he CAN'T be the same God who he next commands us to "Worship HIM with all your heart..."

Any argument based on the myth that the Bible even says Jesus is God (it in fact does not, not even John 1 in original Greek or just honestly translated) is invalid.

Because Jesus (as) worshipped God and was not God. According to Jesus (as). His Father is OUR Father, his God is OUR God.

You can believe what you want. I believe in the Trinity though. God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. There are many versus that talk about this but it is derailing the thread a bit so another thread (many to chose from that already exist) would be the place for that debate.
 
You can believe what you want. I believe in the Trinity though. God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. There are many versus that talk about this but it is derailing the thread a bit so another thread (many to chose from that already exist) would be the place for that debate.

Obviously I can believe what I want, not the issue.

You believe in something that is not Biblical, the Trinity, you claim verses support your beliefs?

Which ones and how? Because I have read every letter and it is not there. It was made a law at Nicea, never in the Bible, still isn't.

My beliefs don't have anything to do with what a book says. It doesn't say what you want to believe it does or you would love to prove me wrong.

You can't so you complain about thread derailment. Do you even know who Azazel is?
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
Obviously I can believe what I want, not the issue.

You believe in something that is not Biblical, the Trinity, you claim verses support your beliefs?

Which ones and how? Because I have read every letter and it is not there. It was made a law at Nicea, never in the Bible, still isn't.

My beliefs don't have anything to do with what a book says. It doesn't say what you want to believe it does or you would love to prove me wrong.

You can't so you complain about thread derailment. Do you even know who Azazel is?

I am not complaining just saying this thread isn't about the Trinity. There are many many many other threads discussing this though. I invite you to join them, or start another entirely up to you.
 
You can believe what you want. I believe in the Trinity though. God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. There are many versus that talk about this but it is derailing the thread a bit so another thread (many to chose from that already exist) would be the place for that debate.


What is the issue is what Jesus said in the Gospels refutes the possibility of the existence of "Trinity."

Yet you believe it. And you are unable to show me how this is possible with the (most ignored and) Greatest Commandment of the Bible making it impossible, which means all you can say is "believe what you want because I sure do, even if it is not Biblical I can pretend."

Lots of luck with that.

My responses are to your comments so if you don't like my response don't comment.

If you can say, pretend Jesus is God I can prove he said he is not, obviously. The obvious remedy if you don't want to hear the truth is don't make claims that aren't true like "Jesus is God", because Jesus (as) never said he was, and did say he was not, God.
 
Last edited:

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
1. Christ is not a victim. He (God Himself) came up with this idea. Then gave it as an option for us

He's a willing victim. He had an accuser and he was murdered.

2. I do not blame Christ for my mistakes. I thank Him for covering up for my mistakes. But He is not to blame.

Thats a personal viewpoint. Others see themselves as decendents/gentiles who contributed to jesus death -because they sinned.- In doing do, they come to him in apology and repentence. God forgives them. They are saved. Everyone thinks differently.

3. I do not believe in the once saved always saved theory that some Christians do. So yes I am still accountable for any sin I commit after salvation. Which is why I pray to God/Jesus for forgiveness time to time for any recent sin. Should I die with any unrepentant sin then I shall be held accountable for it.

Exactly. Not everyone sees it that way. By definiton (not an accusation)

You have the person: jew or gentile
You have the sin: disobidence to god
The victiom: christ
The sacrifice: christ

You have many christians who feel they are a part of jesus physical death. They feel guilty for trying not to blame god for killing christ. When they blame god, they are putting the blame on the sacrifice making christ the scapegoat of theur guilt.

But

God says dont worry because it is Not your fault. He (paradoxally) took your blame, guilt, and your sin and washed it clean.

I forgive you.

When they repent of their "crime" god is pleased. If christians feel they are not to blame for christ death nor feel they harbor blame thats inherit in them to have (sin by thinking), it sounds like ego.

Its also a denominational difference. I cant see people comming to christ if they feel they are innocent of his death. Others see it differently.

Not right or wrong
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Hmm. How I see it is they are both interchangeable and embedded rather than one coming from another.
Interesting...

Yet... can't we change the physical because of the spiritual? In other words, physically my friends with had an inoperable brain tumor with a short death sentence. Spiritually we prayed and the doctors don't understand why it changed.

We understand that as the spiritual affects the natural. But we don't have an example where the natural affects the spiritual
Christianeese, I like that. :D
:)

I wonder why you felt you were in chains, all because you have sinned. :p Better?
LOL... MUUUCH better :D

Good questions and actually this is the first time I would express this to a Buddhist so I am trying to address it in a way that is understandble since my foundational beliefs are founded on a Christian understanding. I believe you would call it "karma". Judmental attitudes brings on judgment. If I am carrying unforgiveness, I am chained to that which I am not forgiving.

LOL... did I win something? :)

The illusion is real rather than fake. I feel that everyone is in an illusion in their mind (and that illusion is real) and therefore to get out of discord in that illusion, one needs to train their mind to do so. I always felt its something you can do for yourself personally (human beings in general).
As noted before... the difference. Christianity is God lifting us up to perfection vs. man,s ability butI understand the principle. (There is a Christian version to that). In that we believe that there is a spirit that is different from the mind (soul), I would agree with the principle concerning the mind yet will still hold that it not changing the spirit of the person.

A man can eat glass by sheer will power or sleep on a bed of nails. The mind does have an ascendency over the body. Our belief is that the third part (you spirit) has an ascdency over both the mind and the body. You can let the physical affect the mind but it is by permission only for the mind is superior to the physical. Likewise the soul can affect your spirit but by permission only for the spirit is superior to both the mind and the body.

Why not? What's the difference between chanting, praying, studying god's word, and meditating?
Again... I hope this doesn't come across offensive in any way... just explaining.

Since we believe you can talk to God, we talk. That's why Jesus said "When you pray, don't keep repeating yourself thinking that because of constant repeating God will hear you more" (my updated 5.5 version).

We explain it this way... "Imagine a child saying to you "can I have a candy" and repeating it ad infinitum. It will more likely cause us to say "YOU AIN'T GETTING NOTHING" (double negative at that) :)

Studying, praying and meditating, in the Christian world, doesn't include repeating oneself (at least not to my knowledge)

Yes. I think the only big difference in this case is you look to someone else who had helped you. We look (always present tense) to ourselves.
Understand you.

I guess that's another way to put it. Sounds nicer. Nuns and monks give up material to devote themselves to their practice. It's not giving up but more saying "god you are more important." I value monastics of any religion. I honestly think it's an ego thing to put other things and people over our spiritual well-being. But I like my family, internet, and good book to read. Who can part??:p
ROFL

I certainly can agree that ego is the part that we all have to deal with and certainly there are Christian denominations who value that lifestyle. On our non-denominational side, we believe in using them as tools rather than giving it up. As an example(exaggerating it for demonstration purposes), I can give up money and live off the land, plowing it by hand and sharing what I produce (and, actually, if that person does it for God, God receives it as a worship (Romans 14), or I can take money, buy a plot of land and a tractor, still share the produce, sell the rest and start an orphanage. Again... if we do it for God, God receives it.

BUT, as you noted, if you do it for personal ego sake (and you can leave everything and still have an ego saying "I have left everything... not like the rest of the world... OH how great I am) and it isn't worth anything, whether you give away millions or give away your materiality.

Yeah. I used sin so you can kinda understand what I mean. Practicing The Dharma such as purification rituals clears up one's illusions. When one is illusioned in thought or have distorted thoughts, we "sin." We commit acts contrary to our true nature of compassion and generosity. When we display the opposite of sin such as good deeds, we purify that sin. If we can do that on a routine basis, that even better.

Think of it like this:

You have someone who came from a war. He developed PTSD from shooting a young child. That event affected his consciousness. The stimuli from the physical and mental emotions involved in that action affected him. When he developed PTSD, it means those actions went to his subconscious. Thereby, in present day, if he feels like he is threatened he acts the same way as he did at war. It's an automatic behavioral trait.

In Buddhism, it says that these events, the strong ones, not only affect our Con and Sub, it also affects our Unconscious. The actions make imprints on our Un. to where it cannot be taken away by an outside party because it's so strong that it needs self purification. So we do meditation that calms our Con. We do insight meditation to address our Sub. I'm still learning, but then there are other meditations that go to the root of the problem, the imprints. Thereby purifying the imprints, cleans both the Sub and Con so we won't be affected.

We do this on a daily routine basis. It's a rough translation of what I learned about the nature of our actions and how they influence us. In my opinion, that's probably why you were in spiritual discord. You had a lot of karma you needed to work out. As for how you worked it out, it's not Buddhist concept, of course; but, it helped so it's all good.
Interesting... I hadn't noticed the word karma here before I wrote about it above;

Thanks for explaining. There are many principles that you are talking about that can be related to Christianity.

In our case, we believe the spirit is in complete accord (no discord) once you are "born-again" and thus, all we have left to do is just work on the mind (soul)

It's not negative. It's more devoting oneself to god rather than enjoying the obstructions of attachments and obstructions that lead one away from god. Some people feel these material obstructions harm their spiritual well being and want to devote themselves to god in a community atmosphere. Others do not. I think it's personal choice more so than who is right or wrong.
Agreed that each person is different and, for some, matrial can obstruct their spiritual well being.

[/QUOTE]

That's another place we differ too. The karmic imprints/roots we can cleanse. That's the only way we can have good fruit. I understand the need for a gardener. A lot of us take up classes ourselves.

[/QUOTE]
Again... so much is the same (although there are differences). We do cleanse our minds and weed the garden (Mark 4). Is there a difference for you between the mind and the spirit?

Have a great day.
 
Last edited:

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
No... your statement of "abodoning critical thinking" is a biased statement. I haven't done that.

You can say you live a moral life when you are the person who is estabilishing what morality is. Who says your morality is right?

How can one be "doomed" if there is a gift of life?

Incidentally, I am not preaching to you or trying to convince you that I am right and you have to change what you think. I'm simply answering your questions within the context of a Biblical foundation. You don't have to believe it if you don't want to.

Well since I don't believe in any of the gods I've ever heard of, I have to say that morality is a human invention. Let me ask you, do you get your morality from your religion? If so, how do you know which bits to pay attention to and which bits to ignore?
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Hm. For some reason in my past life I thought I already replied to you already, lol.
Yet... can't we change the physical because of the spiritual? In other words, physically my friends with had an inoperable brain tumor with a short death sentence. Spiritually we prayed and the doctors don't understand why it changed.

I guess I could argue if your friend wasnt physically there (not present at the moment), who would you be praying for someone who wasnt in front of you (assuming your friend can go invisible for sake of point)?

We understand that as the spiritual affects the natural. But we don't have an example where the natural affects the spiritual
We do just a lot of people dont look kind to people who believe in god by physical invocation of the spirit. I dont know if its new age but people have been using physical to bring spiritual out for centuries. Hasnt caught up with the protest-ants yet. :oops: least not in a language they accept yet.

LOL... MUUUCH better

HAHA

Good questions and actually this is the first time I would express this to a Buddhist so I am trying to address it in a way that is understandble since my foundational beliefs are founded on a Christian understanding. I believe you would call it "karma". Judmental attitudes brings on judgment. If I am carrying unforgiveness, I am chained to that which I am not forgiving.

Hm. Karma says you are owner of your actions. So, if you murdered someone, that consequence will bite you in the future. If you finnally married the one of your dreams, that action would benefit you in the future. Every action you do is saved on a hard drive (ooh gosh. This is a first relating this to computers) on a hard drive that because actions in your past lives imprinted viruses. Your goal is to do good actions because they act as a virus protecter scanning and killing virus little by little. In rebirth, you carry the virusses with you. Your mind is on "scaning now" until all is cleared.

LOL... did I win something?

Haha. They canceled bingo today. Maybe next time.

As noted before... the difference. Christianity is God lifting us up to perfection vs. man,s ability butI understand the principle. (There is a Christian version to that). In that we believe that there is a spirit that is different from the mind (soul), I would agree with the principle concerning the mind yet will still hold that it not changing the spirit of the person.

The Buddha actually talked against a personal god and a unchanging soul as one's identity. Instead, he said that what we experience-such as god ones-are products of our mind based on actions in our past we, as a result, experience now. In some traditons I notice the mind is treated more mystically than others. In general, he says its an illusion that a computer repair would just show up at your door and make your PC born again anew. It helps in this life but the objective is to stop rebirth. Since our experiences change every ten or so years, he argues that our beliefs foucuate too. Nothing is stable.

A man can eat glass by sheer will power or sleep on a bed of nails. The mind does have an ascendency over the body. Our belief is that the third part (you spirit) has an ascdency over both the mind and the body. You can let the physical affect the mind but it is by permission only for the mind is superior to the physical. Likewise the soul can affect your spirit but by permission only fo

Hmm. It took me awhile to understand the mind is root of our experiences. I would have thought spirit but then our mind puts together what we identify as spirit. I see a patttern of holistic experiences of various religions. Since we are all people, The Buddha says no one is special.

Again... I hope this doesn't come across offensive in any way... just explaining.

Since we believe you can talk to God, we talk. That's why Jesus said "When you pray, don't keep repeating yourself thinking that because of constant repeating God will hear you more" (my updated 5.5 version).

Haha. Updating your system, huh?

We explain it this way... "Imagine a child saying to you "can I have a candy" and repeating it ad infinitum. It will more likely cause us to say "YOU AIN'T GETTING NOTHING" (double negative at that) :)

I honestly dont chant because its a distraction. To others its about the sound. Like a choir. You wouldnt tell the choir not to sing the chorus cause god doesnt like you saying I love you more than once.

Perspective, I guess.

Studying, praying and meditating, in the Christian world, doesn't include repeating oneself (at least not to my knowledge)

In our case, we believe the spirit is in complete accord (no discord) once you are "born-again" and thus, all we have left to

Sometimes upgrading will kill some virus. Catholics do it three times a day. Other churches once or twice a month. The Buddha taught a one time do it yourself instructions. We purify daily, but the virus takes lives to clean.

Again... so much is the same (although there are differences). We do cleanse our minds and weed the garden (Mark 4). Is there a difference for you between the mind and the spirit?

True. Everyone should have an upgrade. I think the general concepts the same. We're all human.
 

Attachments

  • 1__YEYNxE7FdvBj3gQ1Knr0A.jpeg
    1__YEYNxE7FdvBj3gQ1Knr0A.jpeg
    7.6 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Top