Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"(Sessions and Rosenstein had already begun considering whether to dismiss Comey months earlier)."
They "considered dismissing Comey" because they were told to "consider dismissing Comey".
Do you not realize that Giuliani no longer counts as a reliable source? Try again.Nah,
Wiki
Dismissal
On May 8, 2017, Trump directed Attorney General Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein to provide advice and input in writing.[47] On Trump's direction, on May 9, Rosenstein prepared and delivered a memorandum to Sessions relating to Comey (Sessions and Rosenstein had already begun considering whether to dismiss Comey months earlier).[47] Rosenstein's memorandum said that the "reputation and credibility" of the FBI had been damaged under Comey's tenure, and the memo presented critical quotes from several former attorneys general in previously published op-eds; Rosenstein concluded that their "nearly unanimous opinions" were that Comey's handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation was "wrong."[5] In his memo, Rosenstein asserted that the FBI must have "a Director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them." He ended with an argument against keeping Comey as FBI director, on the grounds that he was given an opportunity to "admit his errors" but that there is no hope that he will "implement the necessary corrective actions."[48] Rosenstein also criticized Comey on two other grounds: for usurping the prerogative of the Justice Department and the Attorney General in his July 2016 public statements announcing the closure of the investigation into Clinton's emails, and for making derogatory comments about Clinton in that same meeting.[49] Both of these actions, he argued, were in conflict with longstanding FBI practice. To Comey's previous defense that Attorney General Loretta Lynch had a conflict of interest, Rosenstein argued that in such a case, it is the duty of the Attorney General to recuse herself, and that there is a process for another Justice Department official to take over her duties.[50]
She lost. Not hard to understand that.
I see that you did not understand either. She actually won.
Reread it. The claims came from Giuliani.
And she accepted it like an adult, and didn't lie about election fraud and whipped up an insurrection. Oh, and she's not facing any felony counts.
Op research is common, buying material spoon-fed from Russian intel agents, then using it in FASA courts to secure wiretaps is a problem!
I'm not seeing anything from Giuliani. None of the citations came from him that I can see. Can you show me what you are talking about?
Your friend who wrote post #186 disagrees with you. Apparently, losing in now winning.
Once again you appear to not be following the conversation. @F1fan is talking about Hillary Clinton. I was not. All I can say is "Wow!!".
She's not even Nancy pelosi, but Trump is too confused to know.
Oh the irony. Trying and succeeding is one thing, but you wouldn't know.But it's still cute that you're trying so hard.
Trump confused Haley with pelosi.
Trump is running for election, and is a serious threat to democracy, justice, and global peace. It is a duty for every citizen to oppose this threat.
Trump is failing cognitively, in the courts, and let's hope in the election.
Projection. You were the one that conflated the two.And yet, all the related posts lead back to this one: Is the end near for Trump?
Nikki Haley isn't Hillary Clinton.
But it's still cute that you're trying so hard.
And @Laniakea conflated Nikki with Hilary. What is it with Republicans not knowing their candidates, or for that matter the Democrats that are not even candidates.
