Is the evolutionary doctrine a racist doctrine?

[Subduction Zone]

This:

... is practically the same as this:

No, not even close. There were large populations that evolved. Not just a few. Tens of thousands would be a low number. It was probably a lot higher than that.

 

[Eli G]

Both statements are contradictory.

How have you not heard of something you are mentioning? Obviously if you know the name and mention it it is because you have already read about it or heard it.

So both statements are contradictory.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

"acolytes of the doctrine"
^ I like it

I wonder how a person can be an acolyte of doctrine that doesn't exist?

 

[Pogo]

Wait... do you believe that different human races are descended from different species of apes?

That's not how any of this works.

Apparently he does, I'll have to give him credit for a new idea, I've never heard of this "doctrine" before.

 

[Eli G]

And I wonder how people who are ignored insist on getting the attention of those who ignore them. Could it be lack of attention? Low self-esteem? Or simply lack of self-dignity?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

They might be redundant, but it appears you don't know what contradictory means.

It is a cheap attempt at semantics in my opinion and a way to distract from the fact that the doctrine is a made up straw man. Of course, I read the claim here, but that doesn't negate the fact that I've never heard of it in the world. It is silly, disingenuous and doesn't merit mention in my opinion.

 

[John53]

The answer to question posed by the thread title is no.

 

[Pogo]

And I wonder how people who are ignored insist on getting the attention of those who ignore them. Could it be lack of attention? Low self-esteem? Or simply lack of self-dignity?

Huh, you are getting way more attention than you deserve, are you ignoring us because of your low self-esteem or is lack of self-dignity responsible for your arrogance?

 

[☆Dreamwind☆]

Um no. Why would it be? Evolution is physically and behaviorally adaptive. People physically evolved and adapted the way they did, because of the different types of environments they found themselves in. Humans I think, adapt behaviorally more often then we do physically.

 

[Eli G]

Of course, when people cannot face reality they usually invoke cognitive dissonance to avoid it... Sometimes they try to ridicule what they cannot accept; Sometimes they even fear what they don't understand or don't know.

My post#57 shows that I have not attributed to evolutionists anything that they themselves have not invented.

Since there is currently no one here worth reading, I'll leave you until further notice.

 

[John53]

Of course, when people cannot face reality they usually invoke cognitive dissonance to avoid it... Sometimes they try to ridicule what they cannot accept; Sometimes they even fear what they don't understand or don't know.

My post#57 shows that I have not attributed to evolutionists anything that they themselves have not invented.

Since there is currently no one here worth reading, I'll leave you until further notice.

Are we meant to bow, curtsey or wave?

 

[Pogo]

Of course, when people cannot face reality they usually invoke cognitive dissonance to avoid it... Sometimes they try to ridicule what they cannot accept; Sometimes they even fear what they don't understand or don't know.

My post#57 shows that I have not attributed to evolutionists anything that they themselves have not invented.

Since there is currently no one here worth reading, I'll leave you until further notice.

No, you have just been presenting strawmen, not anything that is understood as being part of evolution. It is not us that is not facing reality.

 

[Pogo]

Of course, when people cannot face reality they usually invoke cognitive dissonance to avoid it... Sometimes they try to ridicule what they cannot accept; Sometimes they even fear what they don't understand or don't know.

My post#57 shows that I have not attributed to evolutionists anything that they themselves have not invented.

Since there is currently no one here worth reading, I'll leave you until further notice.

Translated by Monty Python:

Eli: I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty-headed animal food trough wiper! I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!

 

[Dan From Smithville]

There is no where in any of the science surrounding evolution and the theory of evolution that states that any species was said to give birth to a different species. This is a straw man based purely on either a purposely contrived ignorance of the science or a genuine one. In any event, it isn't anything related to science and, were it to happen, would refute the theory.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

I am mestizo, my mother is mulatto, daughter of mulatto and white, granddaughter of black and white ... and my father is white. Racism was a totally non-existent thing in my upbringing environment.

That does not mean that I do not recognize the racial diversity of the human race as a result of different factors that do not interest my topic, but that contribute to the beauty and diversity of God's creation, just as there are different colors and varieties in flowers, butterflies. , fish, birds, etc.

However, I do not see how evolutionary doctrine can fit within human racial diversity.

Someone who knows how to explain without giving so much detours and throwing smoke screens? The truth is that the answers given by the majority of acolytes of that doctrine are shameful.

Yellow, black, blue or white, we are all modern homo sapiens.

 

[Eli G]

Seeing the vulgarity of many evolutionists on the forum, I can foresee, without being a prophet, the grievous social state in which evolutionists would plunge human societies if their doctrine were extended to all of humanity.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

There is only one human race .

Agreed.

Evolution isn't a factor at this time.

Variations of traits evolved in different populations, but they are trivial and do not reflect the so-called race model.

But those variations are real. Just not significant in reinforcing cultural, racial stereotypes.

One of the degrees my youngest sister achieved was in anthropology. In one of her classes, they did a laboratory on the use of facial measurements to determine population origins for each of the students. Her measurements indicated an Asian influence in our past. Years later, this was corroborated by 23 and Me. On our mother's side of the family we are 1/4 Croat. That part of the world was a crossroads for trade and military travel. It was no surprise to me that we have Asian ancestry.

 

[John53]

Seeing the vulgarity of many evolutionists on the forum, I can foresee, without being a prophet, the grievous social state in which evolutionists would plunge human societies if their doctrine were extended to all of humanity.

Now you've insulted everyone who won't agree with you your next post will be telling us how badly you're treated?

I'm testing my prophecy skills.

 

[Eli G]

Apes are quite ugly compared to humans.
How ugly could the first human, children of apes, be and how did they become so fine later?

PS: who doubts the physical beauty of humans?
I've never seen a female monkey with breasts like a woman's, hips and long hair.

Have artists in the service of evolutionary doctrine drawn any female apes with long hair and woman-like breasts?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Now you've insulted everyone who won't agree with you your next post will be telling us how badly you're treated?

I'm testing my prophecy skills.

I find it ironic and amusing that this is a thread about a doctrine that doesn't exist supported by a flawed and incorrect understanding of theory and presented to people as if they are vulgar idiots whose word is worthless simply because it doesn't conform to the entire erroneous position that cannot be sustained. As if pointing those flaws out is itself some sort of flaw or personal attack.